Advanced Search Results

Mukesh Ramchandra Bhardwaj Vs. Usha Vasantrao Kathale

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 213(1) and 213(2)

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR266; 2005(6)BomCR426; 2005(3)MhLj425

not obtain a probate of the Will as required by Sub-section (1) of Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as well as as per the law laid down by this Court in the case of Babasaheb Yeshwant … of this Court in the case of Jyoti wife of Jagdish Singhai v. State of Maharashtra 1979 Mh.L.J. 308.5. I have considered the contentions canvassed by the respective counsel, perused the provisions of Sections 213 and 57

Ka Riverretta Diengdoh Vs. Ka Trially Sara Rymbai and Another

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short the 1925 Act), is directed against the judgment and order dated 22-9-2008 passed by the learned … the proviso thereof Sections 274 to 299, Section 300 excepting sub-section (2) thereof, Sections 301 to 306, Sections 308 to 312, Sections 317 to 319, Sections 368 and 369.(2) The term “estate” or “property” wherever occurring in

Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande Alias Handege Vs.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

the Appellant that the decision in Rupali Mehta does not take into account the scheme of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Learned Single Judge observed that the judgment does not prohibit any person from seeking protection of the … Under Section 307, the executor has the right to dispose of the property which is vested in him. Section 308 empowers the executor and administrator to incur expenditure for the purposes enunciated. The executor or administrator has to

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Sri Durganand Jha

Court : Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 7, 40 and 44

sentence whereas the same expressly refers and confines such expenses to lawful expenditure under Section 307 of the Succession Act, 1925. The executor is given the power to spend something beyond his limits prescribed under Section 307 but these … but these powers can be exercised with the specific direction and the approval of the High Court under Section 308 of the Act. Under the circumstances, it was contended that the executor had no power to pay any

Hrishikesh Das Vs. Sm. Khantamani Dasi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 11(2), 13(1) and 115; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 21; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Section 308; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 14 - Schedule - Articles 60 and 145

Reported in : AIR1959Cal257

on administration of the estate. At all times material for the purpose of his appeal Harish and Srish acted as executors. Brindaban died in 1923.4. During the period of administration of the estate by the executors abovenarned, … pay the sums and made an order accordingly.10. Hrishikesh, one of the Receivers, moved the High Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order and obtained a Rule, which was registered as

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … of Court. 9 Power of and procedure applicable to the National Commission. 308 [2026] 5 S.C.R.Supreme Court Reportsa delay of 7 ½ years. There is … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Uttam Kumar (Deceased) Vs. Madhav and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 166(1); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : 2002ACJ1828; ILR2002KAR1864; 2002(3)KarLJ337

time has been mentioned in the section. There is also no bar under Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short 'the I.S. Act'). Therefore, the observations of the Division Bench in para 3 of the Order … person injured or all or any of the legal representatives of the deceased, as the case may be'. Section 308, under Chapter VI of the I.S. Act, which deals with the demands and rights of action of, or

Emperor Vs. Ambaji Dhakyaji Katkari

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1928Bom143; (1928)30BOMLR380

c. 17 Bom. L.R. 881, followed.;In re Ganapathi Bhatta (1911) I.L.R. 36 Mad. 308, dissented from. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

The Union Trustee Co. of Australia Ltd. Vs. Lena Ethel Bartlam and Oth ...

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1949PC62

imposed when special leave to appeal was granted. Appeal dismissed. Victorian Trustee Companies Act (1928) - Section 17; Succession Act (39 of 1925) - Section 307 and Section 308 -

Radheshyam Basak Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 265, 372 and 388(1); ;Calcutta (West Bengal) Civil Rules, 1935 - Rule 317(1); ;Calcutta (West Bengal) Civil Order, 1935; ;Calcutta High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rules 7 and 9; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1977Cal17

of 24-Parganas have been invested with the functions of the District Judge under Section 388(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 within the local limits of Sadar Munsif of Alipore under the Government of West Bengal Judicial Department Notification … In support of his contention Mr. Chakraborty first refers to a decision reported in (1908) 8 Cal LJ 308, (Mt. Kariman v. A. H. Forbes). In this case an objection was raised on behalf of the opposite