Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 306 · Page 1 of about 193 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 27 1990

Kannamma Vs. Deputy General Manager

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-27-1990

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : I(1991)ACC421; 1991ACJ707; ILR1990KAR4300; 1990(3)KarLJ605

does not find an answer in the aforesaid statutory provisions of the Act.5. Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which bears on the said question, in so far as it is material, reads:'306. All demands whatsoever and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2003

Smt. Munni Devi W/O Late Sh. Jagannath, Vs. New India Assurance Co. Lt ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-21-2003

Subject : InsuranceCivil

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : 1(2003)ACC623; I(2003)ACC623; 2004ACJ974; 2003IIAD(Delhi)255; 103(2003)DLT464; 2003(67)DRJ301; (2003)134PLR13

legal representatives of an injured claimant could pursue the petition in terms of Section 306 of The Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act reads as under:-'306. Demands and rights of action of or against deceased survive … of Indian Succession Act, 1925 is applicable--Insurance Company could not be held to be liable beyond Rs. 50,000/---Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 306.;It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the respondent that the claimants are not entitled to any amount

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2001

E.i. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Klaus Mittelbachert (Deceased) Through L.Rs.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : 2002ACJ549; AIR2002Delhi124; 95(2002)DLT617; 2002(62)DRJ476

prosecuting the suit. 10. Learned Single Judge after referring to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and to the judgment of Supreme Court in M. Veerappa v. Eyelyn Sequeira and Ors. : [1988]2SCR606 held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 29 1985

Munni Devi and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-29-1985

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : 29(1986)DLT38; 1985(9)DRJ270; 1985RLR544

valuable right, it is a property which is heritable by the heirs. (6) Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 reads as under : 'ALL demands whatsoever and all rights to prosecute or defend any action or special

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1967

R.S. Shri Ram Pershad and ors. Vs. Chhano Devi W/O Ram Sarup and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-1967

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 1, 19, 44, 46, 47 and 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92; Tranvancore-Cochin Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 72 - Order 20, Rules 16 and 17; Limitation Act - Sections 10; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi75; ILR1968Delhi41

or the proceeds thereof, or for an account of such property or proceeds. Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, after having provided that all demands and all rights to prosecute or defend any action or special proceeding

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1974

Rabinder Nath Maira and anr. Vs. Steelsons Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-06-1974

Subject : Company

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 212 and 306; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397

Reported in : [1974]44CompCas538(Delhi); 10(1974)DLT235

petitioner can continue the proceedings. (4) Counsel for the applicant has referred to Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The said Section reads as follows : '306 All demands whatsoever and all rights to prosecute or defend

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1959

Ratanlal Bhannalal Mahajan Vs. Baboolal Hajarilal JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-1959

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 1 and 11; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 36, 39 and 49

Reported in : AIR1960MP200

any part of the claim? 7. On the first question, since the plaintiff has died after the Indian Succession Act 1925 bad been applied to these parts by the Part B States Laws Act of 1951, all that we … B States Laws Act of 1951, all that we may have to look to, is the wording of Section 306 of that Act. That Section provides:'All demands whatsoever and all rights to prosecute or defend any action or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1982

Jai Singh Vs. Garhwal Motor Owners and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-21-1982

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95, 102 and 110B; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : AIR1982All480

the above doctrine, it would be sufficient for the purposes of the present case to read Section 306, Succession Act, 1925, and to see whether the case of an injury occasioned by a motor accident is taken out of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1964

Keshavalal Girdharllal Gandhi and ors. Vs. Patel Vithalbhai Shankarbha ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-02-1964

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Debt Laws-Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 2 (4), 2(6), 4 and 46; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 141 - Order 22, Rule I; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : AIR1965Guj275; (1964)GLR988

Act, 1947, Section 141, Order 22 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 306 of Succession Act, 1925 - whether heirs of deceased debtor can continue application for adjustment of debts under Section 4 - on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1968

Hazari and ors. Vs. Neki and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-1968

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Sections 14 and 15(1); Punjab Pre-emption (Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rules 1, 10 and 11; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : AIR1968SC1205; (1968)70PLR823; [1968]2SCR833

1960, Order 22 Rules 1, 10 and 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 306 of Succession Act, 1925 - appellant contended legal representatives not entitled to decree for pre-emption as right of pre-emption was personal right

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial