Advanced Search Results

Chintaman Dhundiraj Vs. Sadguru Narayan Maharaj Datta Sansthan and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 and 20; Hindu Law; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 304

Reported in : AIR1956Bom553

; c) The case discussed the liability of executor de son tort as under Section 304 of the Succession Act, 1925- It was held that persons who had intermeddled with the assets of the deceased in such a way

Bhagvan Manaji Marwadi Vs. Hiraji Premaji Marwadi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom516; (1932)34BOMLR1112; 140Ind.Cas.519

lie only incases of fraud and collusion-Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 183-Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 214 (b)-Arbitration-Reference by one partner-Award not binding on other partners.;An application made under Order XXI, Rule 50, of … Chhaganlal cannot recover the amount without the production of a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act; secondly, that the application under Order XXI, Rule 50, Clause (2), is not within time; and thirdly, the … City of New York v. Parez Triana & Co. [1891] 1 Q.B. 304 when a firm's name is used it is only a convenient method

Michael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … Bapat and others vs. Sankar Sitaram Bapat and others 1996 (1) Bom.C.R. 304 and would submit that the Will can be proved by examining one

Michael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … Bapat and others vs. Sankar Sitaram Bapat and others 1996 (1) Bom.C.R. 304 and would submit that the Will can be proved by examining one

Commissioner, Corporation of the City of Bangalore, Bangalore Vs. S. R ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41 Rule 1, Section 96; Indian succession Act, 1925 - Section 303

Reported in : 1993(2)KarLJ521

justification under Section 303 of the Indian Succession Act is not available to the respondent. Section 303 or Section 304 of the Indian succession Act, 1925 do not confer rights on any person who intermeddles with the property … he was competent to do so as an executor de son tort under Section 303 of the Indian succession Act, 1925. In the alternative he submitted that the appeal filed by the defendants was against a dead person and

Shri Vitthal Ramchandra Mali Vs. Smt. Laxmi Ganpati Mali and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276, 365, 372, 384, 388, 388(1) and 388(2); Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A and 28A(1); Indian Succession Act, 1865; Administration Act, 1881; Succession Certificate Act, 1889 - Sections 19(1), 26, 26(1) and 26(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 and 647

Reported in : AIR2006Bom298; 2006(4)ALLMR389; 2006(4)BomCR31

orders passed by the courts of Civil Judge, Senior Division on Application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act of 1925) for grant of succession certificate. The question to be … all purposes as a notification under Section 388(1) of the said Act of 1925. If the paragraph No. 304 of the Civil Manual makes this position very clear, it must be noted here that sub-paragraph No. (iii)

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … said Act which concerns 'practice of granting and revoking probates and letters of administration' comprises Section 264 to 304. Section 264 provides that the District Judge shall have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and letters of

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … said Act which concerns 'practice of granting and revoking probates and letters of administration' comprises Section 264 to 304. Section 264 provides that the District Judge shall have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and letters of

Gurswarup Joshi Vs. Beena Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 81, 89 and 276

Reported in : AIR2006SC1999; 2007(1)AWC263(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(4)CHN45; 2006(3)CTC53; JT2006(5)SC223; (2006)3MLJ43(SC); 2006(4)SCALE558; (2006)5SCC119

In 1984, the 1st respondent herein filed an application purported to be under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ('the Act', for short) for grant of probate in respect of the said Will. Objections were filed thereagainst. … before decision suffers from manifest error - Orders set aside - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 [C.A. No. 45/1860]. Section 304, Part-I; [Dr. Arijit Pasayat, P.K. Balasubramanyan & D.K. Jain, JJ] Culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Deceased

Mah. Gen. Jonathan Reuben Samson Vs. Zillah Solomon and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106, 138, 211, 255, 263, 278, 301, 303 and 304; Bombay High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 374 and 375; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Rule 20, Order V

Reported in : AIR1991Bom222; 1991(1)BomCR334

legacy given to Zillah and Lily is one given to two persons jointly. Section 106 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies to this bequest. Section 106 reads: 'If a legacy is given to two persons jointly, and one … which is provided for by Section 303 of the Indian Succession Act and the liability is as per Section 304 of the Indian Succession Act. Here the legatees entitled to the assets are the same persons who have