Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 301 · Page 1 of about 133 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 14 2009

Tara Chand Sharma and anr., Vs. Uma Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-14-2009

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR2010P& H30

of Shri Thakur. However, application was filed by sister of the deceased under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for removal of the Executor. The said application, after trial, has been granted with other consequential orders, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2006

Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Yadvinder Thakur and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-11-2006

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 278, 291 and 301; Trusts Act - Sections 71, 73 and 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(4), 9, 92 and 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 22, Rule 4 and 4(4)

Reported in : (2006)143PLR799

of Seth Bhagirath Das, were also impleaded as respondents. In this petition filed under Section 278 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short, 'the Act, 1925'), for the grant of letters of administration of the Will dated 21.1.1985, read … the file.9. In this situation, Civil misc. application No. 2565-CII of 1983 was filed by Shanti Devi under Section 301 of the Act, 1925, for the removal of Yadvinder Thakur as Executor of the Will dated 21.1.1985. It

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2013

Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Another Vs. Ashok Jagjivan Gokal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned counsel placed reliance on Sections 192, 193, 301, 317 and 318 of Indian Succession Act 1925 in support of his submission that respondent Nos.1 and 2 who have acted contrary to the interest of … Devi Vs. Radha Kishan reported in AIR 1935 Lahore 406 in support is his submission that application under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act can be filed only in this Court which has granted probate by making

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 17 2016

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-2016

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been left

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2006

Prof and Dr. D. Venkayya Chowdary Vs. Paruchisti R. Katrak

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2006

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 213, 276, 278 and 301; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD173; 2006(2)ALT456

the said civil miscellaneous appeals.5. O.P. No. 134 of 1996 was filed under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for brevity 'the Act'), O.P No. 140 of 1996 was filed under Sections 213 and 276 of the … filed under Sections 213 and 276 of the Act while O.P. No. 11 of 1999 is filed under Section 301 of the Act.6. For the sake of convenience, in this common judgment, the petitioner in O.P. No. 134

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2011

Anjan Kumar Singhi and anr. Vs. Ranjan Kumar Singhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-09-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 (CPC) - Section 151 - Order 7 Rule 11; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 49, 59, 60; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 300, 301; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 10

with that of a sole Trustee. We do not think that Sections 300 and 301 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, relied upon by Defendant Nos.2 and 3, restrict jurisdiction exclusively to the Calcutta High Court. This is especially … the almost inflexible rules which regulate jurisdiction so far as immovable property is concerned, therefore, do not apply. Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act contemplates a situation where an application is made to suspend, remove or discharge

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

Sharad Subramanyan Vs. Soumi Mazumdar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2) and 30; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 301 and 317; ;Hindu Law; Shastric Hindu Law; ;Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR2006SC1993; 2007(1)AWC360(SC); 2006(6)BomCR342; (SCSuppl)2006(3)CHN135; 103(2007)CLT25(SC); (2006)3MLJ47(SC); 2007MPLJ223(SC); 2006(5)SCALE197; (2006)8SCC91

was inconsistent with and injurious to the estate of Reba Mitra. Consequently, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter 'the Indian Succession Act') the executors having misconducted themselves, were rightly removed by the Testamentary Court. Nature … Counsel for the respondents then referred to the provisions of the Indian Succession Act. He urged that under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act: 'The High Court may, on an application made to it, suspend, remove or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2009

Mrs. Elizabeth Connolly (Nee Faithful) Wife of Phelim Connolly Represe ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-14-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 24 to 28, 33, 118, 213, 227, 263, 301 and 302; Civil Procedure Coce - Order 27, Rule 2

for.In July 1990, one Rev. Benjamin Dorairaj tiled a petition under Section 301 and 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for brevity) to remove the Executrix on the ground that she was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2011

Marten Borchert and anr.Vs. Arzan Khambatta and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-2011

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section, 301, 317, 77, 89 ; Charities Act 1960 - Section 13 ;

of the Testatrix only on and from 21st November 2009 under the provisions of Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Respondents would require to make an inventory of the estate of the Testatrix within six months of … as the executors and appointment of other executors in their place. The Petition is, therefore, essentially filed under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act. The Petition is also filed for directing inventory of the estate of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2011

Marten Borchert and anr. Vs. Arzan Khambatta and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-2011

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 301, 317, 77 ;

of the Testatrix only on and from 21st November 2009 under the provisions of Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Respondents would require to make an inventory of the estate of the Testatrix within six months of … as the executors and appointment of other executors in their place. The Petition is, therefore, essentially filed under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act. The Petition is also filed for directing inventory of the estate of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial