Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 3 · Page 1 of about 4,509 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 22 2007

Madhukar Rajanna Darbhe Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-22-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 57, 213, 213(1) and 213(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 118 and 119; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 331; Hindu Disposition of Property Act, 1916; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR339; 2008(2)BomCR418

of this Court in the case of Ramniklal v. Bhupendra Impex Pvt. Ltd., reported at : AIR2001Bom224 . Section 3 of Succession Act, 1925, conferring power on State to grant exemption from Section 213 is also pointed out. … challenged in these 2 Writ Petitions on the ground that provisions of Section 57(a) and (b) of Indian Succession Act, 1925, violate Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India with prayer to hold that Probate is required

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1975

Mary Assumption Trinidade Etc. Vs. Vincent Manuel Trinidade and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-14-1975

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 5(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2 and 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28)

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi95

effect of the aforesaid conclusion, it was held, negativing the contention of the respondents herein that the Indian Succession Act, 1925 did not then extend to Goa that on the annexation of Goa, the Succession Act was automatically extended … Courts had concurrent testamentary and intestate jurisdiction with the District Judges. The expression 'District Judge' was defined by Section 3(17) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 as meaning, 'the Judge of a principal civil Court of original jurisdiction,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2003

Shri Mahaveerdas Shastri Vs. Shri Sadguru Seva Sangh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-29-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63 and 68; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47, 68 and 73; Indian Registration Act

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT383

The law regarding to execution and attestation of a Will is enshrined in Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which reads as under :--'63. Execution of unprivileged Wills.-- Every testator, not being a solider employed in an … The word 'attested' has not been defined in the Indian Succession Act. However, it has been defined in Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 which reads thus :--'attested', in relation to an instrument, means [and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 23 2005

Anthappa (Deceased) by His Testamentary L.Rs Vs. Distinappa Alias Subb ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-23-2005

Subject : FamilyConstitution

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 332 and 832; Indian Succession Rules; Hindu Law; Adaptations of Law Order, 1950; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 29(2) and 392; General Clauses Act - Sections 3, 4A and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(3), 14, 15 and 372

Reported in : AIR2006Kant60; ILR2006KAR1576; 2006(1)KarLJ270

in force and full effect in view of the provisions of Section 3(1) and 3(2) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925?2. Does the notification referred to immediately herein supra stand impliedly repealed by the provisions of Section 392 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2004

Mathew Luke Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-27-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2004(2)KLT681

properties made by several Christian families in Kerala. The Apex Court declared that the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) will govern intestate succession of Christians, thought to be governed till that … Secretary to take action on certain representations filed by the Council, praying to issue an exemption notification under Section 3 of the Indian Succession Act. The brief facts of the case are the following:-2. The declaration of law

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2007

M.K. Srinivasan and Kannan Vs. Rangarajan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-28-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 265, 266, 270, 273, 278, 286, 295, 299, 384(1), 388, 388(1) and 388(2); Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Sections 87; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 23; Punjab Civil Courts Act, 1918 - Sections 30; Central Provinces Courts Act, 1917 - Sections 19; Bombay Civil courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A; Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 29(1); Madras City Civil Courts Act, 1892; Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 12, 13, 29, 29(1), 29(2) and 29(3); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 4(2); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2004; Bombay Civil Courts [Extension and Amendment] Act, 1958 - Sections 8; Succession Certificate Act - Sections 26; Chenna

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ435

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar v. Rengammal, wherein at pages 321 to 323, it is observed as follows:.The Indian Succession Act, 1925, is a consolidating stature which repealed and re-enacted several statutes which dealt with succession to and protection of … of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukkazhukundram, which has no jurisdiction to try the testamentary succession, as per Section 2[bb] of the Indian Succession Act and prayed for passing necessary orders to call for the original petition … Chengalpattu. Besides, the pecuniary jurisdiction of the case works out to Rs. 34,000/- triable by Sub Court and that this Court has ordered for transmission

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2006

Ewanlangki-e-rymbai and Elaka Jowai Secular Movement Vs. Jaintia Hills ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-2006

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : United Khasi Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(1); Jowai District as an autonomous District the Jowai Autonomous District Act, 1967; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 118, 213 and 213(1); Chotanagar Tenancy Act, 1908 - Sections 7, 8 and 76; Assam Autonomous Districts (Constitution of District Councils) Rules, 1951; United Khasi Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Rules; United Khasi Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Regulations

Reported in : AIR2006SC1589; JT2006(4)SC139; 2006(3)SCALE562; (2006)4SCC748

: AIR2003SC2902 , wherein this Court considered the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 118 of the Succession Act, 1925. The aforesaid provision was struck down by this Court on the ground of arbitrariness violating Article 14 of … is represented by its Vice Chairman and Executive Member. In both the writ petitions the constitutional validity of Section 3 of the United Khasi Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Act, 1959 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1997

K.R. Rajalakshmi Devi (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. K.R. Chandrasekhar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-12-1997

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 61, 63 and 289; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 67 and 68; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 45 and 47; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 1998(3)KarLJ634

circumstance by placing satisfactory evidence on record. The Supreme Court in the said decision held as follows: '(B) Succession Act (1925), Section 61 -- Will --Genuineness -- Proof -- Failure of plaintiff to remove suspicious circumstances by placing satisfactory material … Will might be unnatural and might cut off wholly or in part near relations. (c) Evidence Act (1872), Section 3 -- Appreciation of evidence -- Evidence of attesting witnesses to a Will --Slight discrepancy as to time of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1994

Devisingh S/O Balaramsingh Raghuwanshi and ors. Vs. Smt. Shailabai Wd/ ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-24-1994

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 30; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63 to 68; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 59, 60, 61 and 101

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR183

of the Will has to be proved in accordance with the provisions of section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Further, they have to prove that it is the last Will of the testator. It is then not … tree is as follows :Lalsingh|Balramsingh Deft. No. 1 (since died) Hirabai (wife) Deft. No. 2| |Devising Deft. No. 3 Vijaysingh Deft. No. 5 Rajendrasingh Died on 13-10-1979| |Surjitsingh (Deft. No. 4) Shailabai (wife) (plff.)|Jagjitsingh died on 11-8-1979The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2003

John Vallamattom and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-21-2003

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 25, 26, 27, 32, 44 and 372; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 4, 5 to 49, 51, 58 to 191 and 212; Charitable Uses Act, 1735; Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act, 1888; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1891; Charities Act, 1960; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Sections 213 of the Indian Succession Act; Indian Divorce Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC2902; 2003(5)ALD51(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)283; 2003(4)AWC2689(SC); 2003(3)CTC418; [2003(4)JCR44(SC)]; JT2003(6)SC37; 2003(3)KLT66(SC); 2003(5)SCALE384; (2003)6SCC611

Act, 1925 was enacted in the year 1925, by reason whereof, the Indian Succession Act, 1865 was repealed. Section 3 of the Act confers power on the State Government to exempt any race, sect or tribe residing therein … Constitution of India we are concerned with the constitutionality of the provisions of Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Petitioner No. 1 is an Indian citizen and is a Christian Priest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial