Advanced Search Results

Amalorpava Mary and A. Arputha Josephine Vs. Kulandai Ammal,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 278, 287 and 384

Reported in : AIR2004Mad291; 2004(2)CTC502; (2004)1MLJ634

Ammal, Amalorpava Mary and Arputha Josephine/petitioners filed O.P. No. 278 of 87 before the District Court, Tiruchirapalli under Section 287 of the Indian Succession Act. In the petition it is stated that Innasi Ammal and Innasi Muthu are … of Innasi Ammal, the appellants have filed the above appeal before this Court under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.2. For convenience we may refer the parties as described in O.P. No. 278 of 87. In the matter

Sri Ajoy Kumar Maiti Vs. Dr. Anil Kumar Maiti and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 247, 265, 272, 284, 286, 287 and 288; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2008)IVCALLT315(HC)

order, being Order No. 6 dated 28th February, 2007, whereby an application under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, was allowed, appointing the petitioner/executor as administrator pendente lite.4. In the instant application, the petitioner herein is the … District Judge by the District Delegate in doubtful cases where there is no contention has been provided under Section 287:Section 287. Power to transmit statement to District Judge in doubtful cases where no contention.- In every case in

Vikas Vs. All Concerned

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 286 and 287

Reported in : AIR1995MP131

Case No. 4 of 1993, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for short, the 'Act', for grant of probate.2. The application for grant of probate was filed by the … letters of administration. In a case where the District Delegate is doubtful, has to follow the procedure under Section 287 of the Act which reads thus:'287. Power to transmit statement to District Judge in doubtful cases where no

G. Shanmugham Chetti and anr. Vs. Chinnammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263; Original Side Rules - Rules 30 and 32

Reported in : AIR1978Mad304

which is capable of being so disposed of by him in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or any other law for the time being in force applicable to Hindus. The other portions of the … side Appeal is allowed, but there will be no order as to costs. Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925). Section 263 -- Revocation of grant of probate for just cause -- just cause not proved -- Revocation of … for letters of administration of the said will in O. P. No. 287 of 1973. In that petition though eo nomine the respondent was not

G. Shanmugham Chetty and anr. Vs. Chinnammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ405

which is capable of being so disposed of by him in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or any other law for the time being in force applicable to Hindus. The other portions of the … his arguments mostly on alleged legal infirmities in the matter of the grant.7. Strong reliance was placed upon Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, which reads as follows:263. The grant of probate or letters of administration … filed for letters of administration of the said will in O.P. No. 287 of 1973. In that petition though co-nomine the respondent was not made

Kanu Sharma Vs. Shyamapada Sharma and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 287 and 288

Reported in : AIR1984Cal149,88CWN415

hearing of this revisional application.2. Mr. Kabir. the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, has contended that under Section 287 of the Indian Succession Act, the District Delegate can grant probate or letters of administration if there is … the learned Munsif. Second Court, Serampore in his capacity as District Delegate under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate in respect of a Will stated to have been executed by one Satish Chandra

Lmj International Ltd. Vs. Sea Stream Navigation Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 5, 8, 9, 11, 16, 37, 37(1), 45, 48, 49, 50 and 50(2); ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 37(1), 39 and 39(2); ;Specific Relief Act - Section 6(3); ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 295 and 299; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 54; ;Guardians and Wards Act; ;Representation of the People Act - Section 116; ;Letters Patent Act; ;Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71 and 72; ;City Civil Court Act, 1953 - Section 21; ;City Session Court Act, 1953 - Section 16; ;West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949; ;Tribunals of Criminal Jurisdiction Act, 1952; ;Companies Act, 1913; ;Banking Companies Act, 1949; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4, 100A and 104; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : AIR2007Cal260,2008(1)ARBLR83(Cal),(2007)3CALLT424(HC)

of the Supreme Court in the context of the provisions of Sections 295 and 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure again considered the scope and provision of the … decisions of the Supreme Court and this Court viz. : [1956]30ITR163(SC) , : [1962]3SCR497 , 1998 (2) CWN 287, 1995 (1) CLJ 458, 1965 (2) All ER 68 and : [1988]2SCR1043 . He also relied on an

Gopal Vs. Natarajan and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

behalf of plaintiff. 27. This Court would also like to make reference to Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act 1925 : Section 63, Sub Clause (c) envisages : "that the Will shall be attested by two or more … 81 Mad LW 88 : 1998 Lab LC 1328 and also Govindarajan v. N. Leelavathy, 2011 (5) CTC 287 (Mad). In paragraph Nos. 16 and 17 of the decision cited second supra, a Division Bench of this

Edulji Framroj Dinshaw Vs. Sir Gawasji Jehangir

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1955)57BOMLR763

of appointment under will-The Dispositions of Property (Bombay) Validation Act (Bom. LIV of 1947).;Section 113 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, relates only to the quantum of interest which can be conferred upon unborn persona and is not a … was reiterated in Sopher's case.25. In a recent case Ardeshir Baria v. Dadabhoy Baria (1944) 47 Bom. L.R. 287 Mr. Justice Blagden observed (p. 292):.it does seem unfortunate that their Lordships' attention was apparently focussed entirely on

Framroze Dadabhoy Madon Vs. Tehmina

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : (1947)49BOMLR882

Privy Council upon the trusts of a will, declared to be void under Section 113 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, applied, and he followed a decision of Mr. Justice Blagden in the case of Ardeshir Baria v. Dadabhoy … decision of Mr. Justice Blagden in the case of Ardeshir Baria v. Dadabhoy Baria (1944) 47 Bom. L.R. 287 who also applied Sopher's case to the trusts of a settlement.4. Before the Transfer of Property Act, 1882,