Advanced Search Results

Vera D. Thackersey Vs. Bai Manekbai Annasaheb Thackersey

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 264(1), 265, 265(1), 266, 267, 268, 272, 283, 286, 288 and 299; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28-A and 28-A(1); Bombay High Court Orders; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 55 and 255; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Probate and Administration Act, 1881; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Madras Civil Courts Act - Sections 29(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Bombay City Municipalities Act, 1925; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1977Bom419; (1976)78BOMLR543

which was vested in the High Court. 5. Our attention was invited to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Courts Act. 1869 and R. 255 of the High Court Rules, Civil Manual

Bai Zabu Khima Vs. Amardas Balakdas

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 265, 283, 288 and 295; Saurashtra District and Subordinate Civil Courts Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 28-A (1); Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28-A; Bombay Civil Courts (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1967Guj214; (1967)0GLR281

the powers of a District Judge or a District court as the case may be under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and in exercise of the powers conferred under this Section the High Court of Saurashtra issued a Notification … application to the applicant in order that the same may be presented to the District Judge under Sec 288 of the Indian succession Act, Now it is no doubt true that if the mater rested merely on

Mary Assumption Trinidade Etc. Vs. Vincent Manuel Trinidade and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 5(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2 and 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28)

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi95

effect of the aforesaid conclusion, it was held, negativing the contention of the respondents herein that the Indian Succession Act, 1925 did not then extend to Goa that on the annexation of Goa, the Succession Act was automatically extended … marked either to the elder son, who had been disinherited, or to his wife.(3) By a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, the younger son, respondent No. 1, sought from the District JudgeLetters of … in Motibai Hormusjee Kanga v. Jamsetjee Hormusjee Kanga, Air 1924 Privy Council 28; (24). 'IT is quite clear that the onus of establishing capacity lay

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … M.S. Sonak, J. 1. By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … M.S. Sonak, J. 1. By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section

Sulabha Ramchandra Jadhav and Others Vs. Kalidas Dnyandeo Patil and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Bombay Civil Couts Act, 1948 - Sections 28-A(1); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 388; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Probate and Administration Act, 1881; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR696

1881 or paragraph 5 of schedule III. 7. This Succession Act has now been replaced by the Indian Succession Act, 1925. However, section 388 is in part 10 of the said Act which pertains to issuance of succession certificate. … by the Civil Judge, Senior Division lies before the District Court in view of the provisions of section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Courts Act. Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Courts Act reads as under :-'28

Shri Shridhar and Baba Keshav Phadke and ors. Vs. Shri Shivram and Bal ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR744

with al 1 the power of a District Judge to take cognizance of any contested proceeding under Indian Succession Act, 1925, arising within the local limits of their respective jurisdiction that may be transferred to them by their respective … at the earliest point of time and preferably before issues are settled. This has been statutorily recognised in Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, where the case of territorial jurisdiction or pecuniary jurisdiction the objections … of his wife Savitribai. Subsequently, the mother Savitribai executed a Will dated 28.11.1978 and she died on 29.3.1981. Under the Will, there is a bequeath

E. Enasu Vs. Edakkulathur Kunjuvareed Antony and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 131 and 132; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : AIR1969Ker207

parties will beartheir respective costs in this Court. Family - will - Sections 74, 131 and 132 of Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 28 and 29 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - first respondent filed suit for partition … above and dismissedin other respects. The parties will beartheir respective costs in this Court. Family - will - Sections 74, 131 and 132 of Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 28 and 29 of Transfer of Property Act,

Mary Roy and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : States (Laws) Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3 and 6; Travancore Christian Succession Act, 1092; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1986SC1011; 1986(0)KLT508(SC); 1986(1)SCALE250; (1986)2SCC209; [1986]1SCR371; 1986(1)LC515(SC)

originally forming part of the erstwhile state of Travancore or is such intestate succession governed by the Indian Succession Act 1925 and if it continues to be governed by the Tranvacore Christian Succession Act 1092, whether Sections 24, 28 … Succession Act 1925 and if it continues to be governed by the Tranvacore Christian Succession Act 1092, whether Sections 24, 28 and 29 of that Act are unconstitutional and void as being violative of Article 14 of

Adil Phiroz Makhania Vs. Dilip Gordhandas Gondalia and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

probate granted almost 38 years ago cannot be revoked unless the requirement of Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 are satisfied/justified. The case of the Appellant is that this Court should in terms of Section 263 of … of this court in the case of Peter John D'souza and Ors. Versus Armstrong Joseph D'souza delivered on 28th March, 2014 in Misc. Petition No. 69 of 2012 and would submit that if a fraud is committed