Advanced Search Results

Jamunabai and Two ors. Vs. Surendrakumar and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 59, 63, 279, 281 and 283; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 68; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 30; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1995MP274; 1996(0)MPLJ113

deciding the rights of the parties in issue.7. 'Will' has been defined in Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. According to the definition, 'Will' means the legal declaration of the intention of a testator with respect to … entitled to any relief, and lastly (g) the probate application was not in accordance with the provisions of Section 279/281 of the Indian Succession Act. He, therefore, submitted that the order passed by the court below be set

Ashok Kothari Vs. Dipti Bavishi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 234, 261, 263, 268, 279, 283 and 283(1); ;Probate and Administration Act - Sections 62 to 78; ;Administrator-General's Act; ;Hindu Wills Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR2007Cal21

with this Chapter and the said Acts.15. We shall hereafter discuss the procedure laid down in the Indian Succession Act 1925 but regard being had to the fact that probate is granted by this Court both in the Common … touch with the appellant and made diverse enquiries. The appellant was obliged to disclose this subsequent fact Under Section 279 of the Indian Succession Act because an allegation to the contrary made in paragraph 11 of the application

Joyna John Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299/384, 276/279, 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68

1. The present appeal under section 299/384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is directed against the order dated 02.07.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge, whereby the learned Judge has

Bhagirathibai W/O Chandrabhan Nimbarte and Another Vs. Tanabai W/O Ram ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the grant applicable thereto descends on a single heir or to any property to which the Indian Succession Act, 1925, applies. 4. Savings.— Nothing in this act shall apply to the property of any Hindu dying intestate before … the death of Vithoba, his widow Radhabai had a right of maintenance. Hence, after coming into force of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, she became the absolute owner of half share in the suit property

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Thr. Its Divisional Manager Vs. Sheik ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

do not find any merit in this appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. Succession Act, 1925 - Section 306 - Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Section 30 - Case Law Referred : 1. Aan … decision in case of AanSingh (D) by LRs ..vs.. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.; AIR 2007 (NOC) 279 (DEL). The facts of that case were that the plaintiff was employer of Delhi University. Because of negligence

Naresh Chandra Ghosh and ors. Vs. Archit Vanijya Viniyog Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 29, Rule 4, Order 39, Rules 1, 4 and 5;; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 279 and 297;; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 52

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT269(HC)

the question as to whether in the facts and circumstances of this case section 297 of the Indian Succession Act would be applicable was required to be decided in the suit itself and, thus the learned Judge could

Mrs. Pushpa Vadera Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Education

Reported in : (1996)87CompCas921

no effect as the will has not been executed and attested in the manner provided under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The witness clause of the will reads as under : "In witness whereof, I have signed this will … case of Borland's Trustee v. Steel Brothers and Co.Ltd. [1901] 1 Ch 279, Beattie v. E & F Beattie Ltd. [1938] 1 Ch 708 and … on March 28, 1990, by Mrs. Pushpa Vadera, an Indian inhabitant (hereinafter referred to as "the appellant") under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, for issuance of necessary directions to Thomas Cook (India) Limited (hereinafter referred

Bratindra Nath Dey Vs. Sukumar Ch. Dey

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 74 and 300(2)

Reported in : AIR1970Cal85

no jurisdiction in the matter. He, at a later stage, has conceded that Section 300(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 gives a concurrent jurisdiction to the Calcutta High Court and that this Hon'ble Court can deal with this … witness and also the present applicant.6. Relying on Umesh Chandra Biswas v. Rashmohini Dassi, (1894) ILR 21 Cal 279, Mr. Ghosh has argued that due execution of a Will implies not only that the testator must be

Shri NaraIn Singh Etc. Vs. the State and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

are as under :“The respondent No.2, Jagdish Chand Sharma, filed a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of letter of administration with regard to the will of late Nathu Singh executed in his

Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia Vs. State of Gujarat .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of List III of Seventh Schedule to the Constitution and a concurrent subject, the Central legislation namely Indian Succession Act, 1925 must hold the field and any prohibition in the State enactment inconsistent with the general principles of the … were set out by the Division Bench as under:-. “We are called upon to decide as to whether Section 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands, Act, 1948 (for short ‘the Bombay Tenancy Act’) debars an … Statutory Interpretation by Justice G.P. Singh (8th Edn., 2001) wherein at pp. 279-280 the learned author states- ". . . . .in selecting one out