Advanced Search Results

Ashok Kumar Singhal and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1996)9SCC48; [1996]2SCR833; 1996(2)LC487(SC)

the High Court is, therefore, correct. We find no force in the contention.6. Section 275 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 reads thus:275. - The application for probate or letters of administration, it(sic) made and verified in the manner

Krishna Kumar Birla Vs. Rajendra Singh Lodha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 213, 213(1), 229, 231, 232, 242, 263, 275, 276, 283, 283(1), 283(2), 284, 284(1), 284(2), 284(3), 284(4), 286, 295 and 301; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 73; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8 and 15; Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Sections 69, 70, 71 , 72, 73 and 83; Parliamentary Act; Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Sections 15, 15(1) and 15(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 and 122 - Order 14, Rule 1; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 417 and 420; Calcutta High Court Rules - Rules 4, 5, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 30; Supreme Court Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 32 and 227

Reported in : 2008(1)BLJR1292; 3(2008)CLT39(SC); 2008(3)CTC43; JT2008(4)SC82; (2008)3MLJ1002(SC); 2008(4)SCALE202; (2008)4SCC300; 2008AIRSCW2557; 2008(3)LH(SC)1891; 2008(3)ICC1; 2008(4)KCCRSN313

derive any Caveatable interest in the estate of wife - Directions issued - Appeals disposed of - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 Section 63: Validity of Will Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity … Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity of Will. -- Sections 275, 283 & 286: [S.B. Sinha & H.S. Bedi, JJ] Jurisdiction of Probate Court Held, It is limited to

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ujagar Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)665; [1997(75)FLR1]; JT1996(10)SC42; (1997)IILLJ981SC; 1996(8)SCALE3; (1996)11SCC116; [1996]Supp7SCR227; 1997(1)LC408(SC)

entitled to the interest as directed by the Tribunal.4. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 Section 63: Validity of Will Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity … Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity of Will. -- Sections 275, 283 & 286: [S.B. Sinha & H.S. Bedi, JJ] Jurisdiction of Probate Court Held, It is limited to

Motors and Investments Ltd. Vs. New Bank of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT14(SC); 1996(8)SCALE645; (1997)11SCC271; [1996]Supp8SCR141

by auction by inviting tenders or open sale - Division Bench right in setting aside sale. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 Section 63: Validity of Will Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity … Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity of Will. -- Sections 275, 283 & 286: [S.B. Sinha & H.S. Bedi, JJ] Jurisdiction of Probate Court Held, It is limited to

Saumindra Bhattacharya Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Food Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 12, 14, 14A, 16, 16(1AA), 17 and 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 320; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2009(II)OLR(SC)877; 2009(13)SCALE29; 2009(10)LC4642(SC)

of High Court not maintainable - Proceedings against Accused No. 3 also quashed - Appeal allowed - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 Section 63: Validity of Will Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity … Held, Theory of spiritual well-being of deceased soul has no reference in judging validity of Will. -- Sections 275, 283 & 286: [S.B. Sinha & H.S. Bedi, JJ] Jurisdiction of Probate Court Held, It is limited to

Mahamaya Dassi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 26, 161, 164, 168 and 256; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 247

Reported in : [1980]126ITR748(Cal)

order to examine this question, it may be relevant to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.18. Section 2 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, provides the definition and Sub-clause (a) of Section 2 defines … [1909] 10 CLJ 263 and reliance was placed on the observations of Sir Asutosh Mookerjee J., at page 275 of the report, that the estate of the deceased in case of an administrator pendente lite vested in

V. Ramaswami Aiyangar and anr. Vs. A.R.S.M.S. Sundaresan Chettiar and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 11; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 275 and 276

Reported in : AIR1952Mad25; (1951)2MLJ523

Govinda Menon, J. 1. when once it is con-ceded that with respect to Wills executes by Hindu outside the City of Madras it is unnecessary to take out a probate in order that the under

smt.rathi Devi .d.s Vs. Sri d.s.deviprasad

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

the impugned order on the ground that a petition for Probate filed under section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 on being contested under section 295, partakes the form of a regular suit, but this does not mean … and having perused the petition papers, this Court grants indulgence in the matter because: a) the provision of Section 275 provide for inter alia for grant of Probate of a WILL; such applications are filed before the jurisdictional

K.R. Rajalakshmi Devi (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. K.R. Chandrasekhar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 61, 63 and 289; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 67 and 68; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 45 and 47; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 1998(3)KarLJ634

circumstance by placing satisfactory evidence on record. The Supreme Court in the said decision held as follows: '(B) Succession Act (1925), Section 61 -- Will --Genuineness -- Proof -- Failure of plaintiff to remove suspicious circumstances by placing satisfactory material … Narayana under a registered lease deed dated 3-10-1970 marked as Ex. D-1 on a monthly rental of Rs. 275/- and further that twomore shops were also leased by both of them to the said Ashwath Narayana on

Elsy Vs. Raju

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 222, 237, 238, 239, 266, 268, 275, 276, 280, 281, 283, 284, 285 and 295; Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 - Sections 55 and 56 - Schedule I and 2, Article 1, 4, 6 and 11; Indian Succession Rules (Kerala), 1968 - Rule 6, 17, 22 and 26

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT890

invoking the testamentary and intestate jurisdiction of the District Judge under Sections 266 and 268 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). The first respondent V.K. Raju was the petitioner in the … gives the form in which the petition for probate is to be verified by at least one witness. Section 275 of the Act declares that an application for probate if made and verified in the manner provided under