Advanced Search Results

Vera D. Thackersey Vs. Bai Manekbai Annasaheb Thackersey

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 264(1), 265, 265(1), 266, 267, 268, 272, 283, 286, 288 and 299; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28-A and 28-A(1); Bombay High Court Orders; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 55 and 255; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Probate and Administration Act, 1881; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Madras Civil Courts Act - Sections 29(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Bombay City Municipalities Act, 1925; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1977Bom419; (1976)78BOMLR543

which was vested in the High Court. 5. Our attention was invited to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Courts Act. 1869 and R. 255 of the High Court Rules, Civil Manual … exercise. Mr. Paranjape invited our attention to certain sections of the Indian Succession Act, viz. Sections 264, 266, 267, 268, 283 and 299. According to Mr, Paranjape, the fact that in these sections the words used are,

Anthappa (Deceased) by His Testamentary L.Rs Vs. Distinappa Alias Subb ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyConstitution

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 332 and 832; Indian Succession Rules; Hindu Law; Adaptations of Law Order, 1950; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 29(2) and 392; General Clauses Act - Sections 3, 4A and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(3), 14, 15 and 372

Reported in : AIR2006Kant60; ILR2006KAR1576; 2006(1)KarLJ270

in force and full effect in view of the provisions of Section 3(1) and 3(2) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925?2. Does the notification referred to immediately herein supra stand impliedly repealed by the provisions of Section 392 of … decision of the Mysore High Court in Kiritappa v. Aralappa andOrs. Mysore High Court Reports Vol. XL, Pages 267 to 276, which dealt with the law governing Christian converts and also in relation to adoption and the

Twinkle Jatin Khanna @ Twinkle Akshay Kumar Vs. Anita Advani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

has limited effect and cannot deprive such party to seek revocation of probate u/s 263 of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Reliance is placed on the judgment of Supreme Court in case of Elizabeth Anthony Vs Mchel Charles John … such discretion exercised by the learned Prothonotary and Senior Master. 19. Rule 267, 268 and 271 of the High Court(OS) Rules are extracted as under:- … the respondent filed another complaint before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate against the applicant and her family members under section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code inter alia praying for production of original will of Mr. Rajesh Khanna.

Parmeshwar Prasad (Since Deceased) Lord Northbrook and Others Vs. Stat ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

This judgment shall dispose of the Probate Petition filed by the petitioners under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of probate on the basis of the Will dated 30.10.1985 read with Codicil dated 7.11.1985. This … provisions has placed reliance on case titled Basanti Devi vs. Ravi Prakash Ram Prasad Jaiswal; (2008) 1 SCC 267 to contend that since the Apex Court in the said judgment has held the requirements of Section 283

Bhanvarilal Sharma Vs. Raj Kumar Sharma

Court : Guwahati

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 237, 238, 239 and 276; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137

H.K.K. Singh, J. 1. This is a statutory appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (herein after referred to as 'the Act') directed against the judgment and order dated 5-12-2001, passed by the … the time when the petition for probate was filed before the District Judge. In such a case, under Section 267 of the Act, the one who is in possession of the Will and other testamentary papers may be

Sanjay Mehra and ors. Vs Sunil Malhotra and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Delhi Rent Control

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14 (1) (a), (c), 14(1)(K), 14(l)(b), 25 B (4)(5), 14(7) ; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 372

No.2 herein. In relation thereto Shri Jai Dayal Mehra filed a petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for a succession certificate in respect of the debts and securities of late Shri Devi Dayal Mehra. This … 1964. This was further confirmed with the dismissal on 28th May 1970 of the second appeal SAO No. 267- D of 1964 by this court.6. The finding by this Court on Section 14(1) (e) DRCA was that

Peshori Lal Vs. State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Reported in : 96(2002)DLT491

clause and intention of testatorc) The case discussed the power and duty of the Court under Sections 264, 267 and 268 of the Succession Act, 1925, entrusted with the probate petition - It was ruled that, the … considered for making out the intention of the testator of the will as per Section 87 of the Succession Act, 1925 - It was ruled that in order to know the intention of testator, its important to see what

Chittaranjan Narottamdas Negandhi Vs. Hemkala Alias Meenakshi Mansingh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

evidence on record, it is necessary to note the provisions of Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: "59. Person capable of making Wills.- Every person of sound mind not being a minor may dispose of … two elements. Before I turn to the evidence on record, it is necessary to note the provisions of Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: "59. Person capable of making Wills.- Every person of … certificates of Chimanlal Vakil (Paperbook, p. 266), and V.J. Ved (Paperbook, p. 267). 13. Part of the cross-examination of PW 1, the Plaintiff, was before

Asoke Kumar Himmatsinghka Vs. Rajendra Kumar Himmatsinghka and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 213; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151 - Order 1, Rule 10; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2005(3)CHN353

said suit, under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for stay of the said suit till the disposal of the probate proceeding in respect of the Will … in the case of Amar Chandra Roy and Anr. v. Abanidhar Roy and Ors., reported in 84 CWN 267.11. The moot question involved in this application is whether the learned Trial Judge was justified in staying of

William Jacks and Co. (India) Ltd. Vs. Skipper Sales Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rules 1 and 2; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)357; 69(1997)DLT36

to Public Witness .I, he being her brother. He had obtained Probate under Section 289 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in the Court of Mr. N.C. Kochhar, District Judge, Delhi (as His Lordship then was) in Probate Case … Seth there was an agreement dated 28.7.1989 with the builder Skipper Towers Pvt. Ltd. for the purchase of 267 sq. ft. covered area. On 29.12.1990 Mrs. Vidhu Seth received a letter from the builder that instead of