Advanced Search Results

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar Vs. Rengammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 265; ;Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 29(1); Indian Succession Act, 1925

Reported in : AIR1962Mad450

They are (1) By virtue of a notification made by this Court under Sec. 265 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, all subordinate Judges in the Madras Province have been appointed as ex officio District delegates under that enactment … person. Section 264 confers jurisdiction to the District Judge to grant or revoke probate or letters of administration. Section 265 lays down that the High Court may appoint such judicial officers within any district as it thinks fit

Vera D. Thackersey Vs. Bai Manekbai Annasaheb Thackersey

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 264(1), 265, 265(1), 266, 267, 268, 272, 283, 286, 288 and 299; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28-A and 28-A(1); Bombay High Court Orders; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 55 and 255; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Probate and Administration Act, 1881; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Madras Civil Courts Act - Sections 29(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Bombay City Municipalities Act, 1925; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1977Bom419; (1976)78BOMLR543

which was vested in the High Court. 5. Our attention was invited to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Courts Act. 1869 and R. 255 of the High Court Rules, Civil Manual … Civil Courts Act, 1869. He also contended that the High Court's power of delegation was circumscribed statutorily by Section 265(1) of the Succession Act, which factor was brought to the forefront by the provisions of Section 272 which

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar Vs. Rengammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ318

are : (1) By virtue of a notification made by this Court under Section 265 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, all Subordinate Judges in the Madras Province have been appointed as ex offico District Delegates under that enactment

Bai Zabu Khima Vs. Amardas Balakdas

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 265, 283, 288 and 295; Saurashtra District and Subordinate Civil Courts Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 28-A (1); Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28-A; Bombay Civil Courts (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1967Guj214; (1967)0GLR281

the powers of a District Judge or a District court as the case may be under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and in exercise of the powers conferred under this Section the High Court of Saurashtra issued a Notification … could have jurisdiction to entertain the application and to grant letters of administration as a District Delegate under Section 265 of the Indian Succession Act but as soon as the case became a contentious one on the opponent

Chander Kumar JaIn Vs. Anand Kumar JaIn and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264 (1), 265 (1) and 269 (1); Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 8 and 8 (2); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 and 42

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC2785

that in view of the definition of the District Judge as contained in Section 2(fab) of the Indian Succession Act. 1925 (hereinafter called as the Act) the transferee Court is not a principal civil court of original Jurisdiction. That … have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and letters of administration in all cases within his district.6. Section 265(1) provides as follows :'The High Court may appoint such Judicial Officers within any district as it thinks fit

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth Annamalai Vs. Mrs. Valliammai Achi, W/O of Late Dr. Al ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : T.N. Court-fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Sections 55, 56, 61 and 63 - Articles 1 to 6, 7, 11(K); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 261, 264, 265, 266, 268, 276, 284, 295 and 299; High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rules 4, 25, 55, 689, 690 and 692; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 1908 - Sections 26, 75 to 78, 86, 87-B, 90 to 92, 94, 95, 100, 104, 141 and 144 - Order 41 Rule 1; Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order 2, Rules 2, 20 to 50, 51 to 68; Government of India Act, 1915; Indian Oaths Act, 1873; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Parition Act, 1893; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Divorce Act,1869; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Stamp Act, 1899;

Reported in : AIR1991Mad284

the plaintiff filed the O. P. No. 197 of 1988 under Ss. 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with O. XXV, Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules. In the said petition, the petitioner sought … shall have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and letters of administration in all cases within his district. Section 265 empowers the High Court to appoint delegates of District Judges to deal with non-contentious cases. Section 266 provides

Atma Ram Vs. Smt. Janki and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 265, 286 and 288

Reported in : AIR1998HP14

in dispute that Senior Sub Judge was delegate of District Judge appointed under Section 265 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (heerinafter referred to as 'the Act'), which clearly stales that appointment of District Delegate is made to grant

M.K. Srinivasan and Kannan Vs. Rangarajan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 265, 266, 270, 273, 278, 286, 295, 299, 384(1), 388, 388(1) and 388(2); Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Sections 87; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 23; Punjab Civil Courts Act, 1918 - Sections 30; Central Provinces Courts Act, 1917 - Sections 19; Bombay Civil courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A; Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 29(1); Madras City Civil Courts Act, 1892; Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 12, 13, 29, 29(1), 29(2) and 29(3); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 4(2); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2004; Bombay Civil Courts [Extension and Amendment] Act, 1958 - Sections 8; Succession Certificate Act - Sections 26; Chenna

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ435

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar v. Rengammal, wherein at pages 321 to 323, it is observed as follows:.The Indian Succession Act, 1925, is a consolidating stature which repealed and re-enacted several statutes which dealt with succession to and protection of … person. Section 264 confers jurisdiction on the District Judge to grant or revoke probate or letters of administration. Section 265 lays down that the High Court may appoint such judicial officers within any district as it thinks fit

Sri Ajoy Kumar Maiti Vs. Dr. Anil Kumar Maiti and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 247, 265, 272, 284, 286, 287 and 288; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2008)IVCALLT315(HC)

Act, 1925. To begin with, the power to appoint Delegate of District Judge has been spelt out in Section 265. Section 265 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, is reproduced hereinbelow:Section 265 - Power to appoint Delegate of … order, being Order No. 6 dated 28th February, 2007, whereby an application under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, was allowed, appointing the petitioner/executor as administrator pendente lite.4. In the instant application, the petitioner herein is the

Balbhadra Singh Alias Balbhadra NaraIn Singh Vs. Munaka Devi and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Family

Judge in seisin of the proceeding to grant probate of a will in a proceeding under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (the Succession Act' in short). The objection having been rejected he has come to this Court in revision.2. … special class of Judicial Officers know as District Delegates appointed in that behalf in manner laid down in section 265. It would also appear that provisions restricting the Power to grant probate or letters of administration only in