Advanced Search Results

Vera D. Thackersey Vs. Bai Manekbai Annasaheb Thackersey

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 264(1), 265, 265(1), 266, 267, 268, 272, 283, 286, 288 and 299; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28-A and 28-A(1); Bombay High Court Orders; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 55 and 255; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Probate and Administration Act, 1881; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Madras Civil Courts Act - Sections 29(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Bombay City Municipalities Act, 1925; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1977Bom419; (1976)78BOMLR543

which was vested in the High Court. 5. Our attention was invited to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Courts Act. 1869 and R. 255 of the High Court Rules, Civil Manual

Sarasamma Vs. G. Pandurangan and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the Will in question was not only executed and attested in the manner required under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 but it should also be found that the said Will was the product of the free volition of … may be granted to him of the whole estate, or of so much thereof as may be unadministered. Section 255: Probate or administration, with Will annexed, subject to exception:--Whenever the nature of the case requires that an exception

Mah. Gen. Jonathan Reuben Samson Vs. Zillah Solomon and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106, 138, 211, 255, 263, 278, 301, 303 and 304; Bombay High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 374 and 375; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Rule 20, Order V

Reported in : AIR1991Bom222; 1991(1)BomCR334

legacy given to Zillah and Lily is one given to two persons jointly. Section 106 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies to this bequest. Section 106 reads: 'If a legacy is given to two persons jointly, and one … also relied upon AIR 1929 Lah 753, H. P. Robson v. Administrator General, Punjab. He also referred to Section 255 of the Indian Succession Act and urged that if Zillah and Emannuel wanted administration only in respect of

Vrandavanla Goverdhanlal Pitti and anr. Vs. Kamala Bai Goverdhanlal an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59 to 190, 211, 213, 222 and 237 to 260

Reported in : AIR1970AP109

amended by Act XXI of 1870) corresponding to the sections set out in Schedule III of the Indian Succession Act 1925 were made applicable to all wills and codicils specified in clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 wherever … 260 which deal with grants limited in duration are only applicable to limited grants and exceptions. Of these, Section 255 allows a limited probate in special circumstances of which the following are some examples.(i) When the testator makes

Pushpa Bala Jagam Vs. K. Ananda Kumar,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 222, 255 and 276; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68, 103 and 111

40 of 1993. The plaintiff, who filed a petition under Sections 222, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to grant probate, which was converted into testamentary original suit, is the appellant before this Court.2. The appellant … the order dismissing the suit in TOS No. 40 of 1993. The plaintiff, who filed a petition under Sections 222, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to grant probate, which was converted into testamentary

Manohar Son of Bapurao Sapre Vs. Bhaurao Son of Tukaramji Shirbhate an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 39 of 1925 - Sections 276, 384 and 388; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A; Succession Certificate Act, VII of 1889 - Sections 26(1); Bombay Regulation, VIII of 1827 - Sections 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Probate and Administration Act, 1881; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1996Bom29; 1995(4)BomCR661; 1995(2)MhLj336

305) of the Civil Manual and he also submits that in view of Section 388 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 the appeal could lie only before the District Judge and not to this Court as submitted by the … the High Court. In this connection the learned counsel for the applicant placed reliance on paragraphs 254 and 255 of the Civil Manual.3. Per contra, Mr. Udhoji, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that since

Bai Ujambai Govindji Vs. Harakchand Govindji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : AIR1935Bom242; (1935)37BOMLR300

widow and was not made on the footing that she had renounced the executorship;;(2) that as the Indian Succession Act, 1925, did not expressly provide for the case of a person who obtained property by survivorship, it was open … a person to whom coparcenary property has passed by survivorship has the right to apply for representation under Section 255 or 256, as the case may be. In this view of the case it is not necessary to

Hepzibah Annathai Rengachari Vs. R. Ananthalakshmi Rangachari

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 255; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1975Mad342; (1975)2MLJ387; MANU/TN/0233/1975

when Letters of Administration are applied for, as envisaged by the provisions of Chapter II of the Indian Succession Act, the entirety of the assets of the deceased should be disclosed in the affidavit of assets which will … invoke Section 254(1), in our opinion, the real exception applicable to this case is what is contained in Section 255. Where it is a case of joint account in a Bank and the amount is payable to either

In Re: T.K. Parthasarathi Naidu

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 254 to 257

Reported in : AIR1955Mad411

1 and 2 of Part IX, Indian Succession Act (Act 39 of 1925), for, the introductory Section 217 prescribed, that save as otherwise provided by … annexed limited to certain specific items is the power conferred by Section 42, Probate and Administration Act, now Section 255, Indian Succession Act. He also thought that there having been a grant under that Section in respect of … indebted to Sri K. Viraswami, Assistant Government Pleader, who took us through the relevant sections of the Indian Succession Act as well as the decisions of the various High Courts and also the. English law bearing on this

Priyamvada Devi Birla, Rajendra Singh Lodha Vs. Laxmi Devi Newar and a ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 211; ;Estate Duty Act - Sections 20 and 37; ;Estate Duty (Controlled Companies) Rules, 1953 - Rule 15; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 30; ;Companies Act - Sections 255, 291 and 292

Reported in : 2005(4)CHN544

or for passing order of injunction. He has drawn my attention to the Section 211 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and submits that all the properties under the law on death of testatrix vest unto the executor. Under … found that a person holding major shares really control the affairs of the company. Under the provision of Section 255 of the Companies Act, the directors of the company are appointed in the Annual General Meeting of all