Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 228 · Page 1 of about 142 results (0.052 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 19 2002

Krishnan Kunjulakshmi Vs. Narzan Alias Radhakrishnan Nair and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-19-2002

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 228, 232 and 263

Reported in : AIR2003Ker98

Abdul Gafoor, J.1. The appellant did not succeed in an application filed under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', to get letters of administration issued in O.R (LA) No. 152/88 revoked. … 92/86, filed O.P. (LA) No. 152/88 before the District Court, Thiruvananthapuram. seeking letters of administration, in terms of Section 228 of the Act. In the said petition, no respondent had been impleaded and the petition discloses that there

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1953

In Re: Laurence Claude Levack

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-28-1953

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 228, 237, 238, 239, 241, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : AIR1954Mad898; (1954)IIMLJ249

security being furnished. Family - exemption - Sections 228, 237, 238, 239, 241, 276 and 276 (1) of Succession Act, 1925 - Section 291 (1) exempts person to whom letters of administration are granted under Section 241 from giving

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2008

Dharamvir Sharma Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-2008

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 228 and 276

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT149

as described by him in the will. 4. The petition is accompanied by an application seeking exemption under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 from the requirement of producing the original will, since it has been … S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. This petition under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeks grant of letters of Administration concerning the Will of one Shri. Kunwal Kumar Sharma (hereafter 'the testator'),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 09 1997

Anz Grindlays Bank Plc and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-09-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 228

Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)655; 71(1998)DLT175

K.S. Gupta, J. (1) This petition under Section 228 read with Section 241 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, has been filed alleging that Ms. Esther Chawner, was a permanent resident of Ywca, 4, New Cantonment Road,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2000

Rohini Damji Sidpra Vs. Freny Damji Sidpra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2000

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act 1925 - Section 228

Reported in : (2001)10SCC588

calls for our interference. This petition is accordingly dismissed. - [ A.P. Mishra and; Doraiswamy Raju, JJ.] -- Succession Act, 1925 - Section 228 - Will executed in Uganda - Probate obtained by executrix from Uganda High Court -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2005

Shri Prem Prakash Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-02-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 228, 276, 276(1), 280, 281 and 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 340

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT681; 2005(81)DRJ157

or not.50. Where no executor is appointed under a Will, the beneficiary would be entitled in terms of Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to be granted letters of administration with Will annexed.51. Accordingly, non-compliance with … that the verification of the petition by the attesting witness in compliance with Section 281 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 shows that Pehlad, one of the two attesting witnesses did not verify the petition but signed the same

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1958

Blackwood and Sons Ltd. and ors. Vs. A.N. Parasuraman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-1958

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 366(10) and 372; International Law; Imperial Copyright Act, 1911 - Sections 25 and 35; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 18(3); Continuance of Copyright Act, 1911; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41 and 82; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 213, 228 and 270; Copyright Act, 1914 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 4 and 4(1)

Reported in : AIR1959Mad410

of Copyright Act, 1911, Sections 41 and 82 of Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 213, 228 and 270 of Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 1, 2, 2 (1), 4 and 4 (1) of Copyright Act, 1914 - petition sought for … and constitutes the procedural requirement of the lex fori. In considering this it is necessary to advent to Section 228 of the Succession Act :'When a will has been proved and deposited in a court of competent jurisdiction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2007

Sreemanthula Kesavachari (Died) Per L.R. Sreemanthula Rajeswaramma Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214 and 214(1); Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 22(3); Administrator General's Act, 1913 - Sections 31 and 32; Succession Certificate Act, 1889; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 219 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 51

Reported in : AIR2008AP74; 2007(6)ALD796; 2008(1)ALT1

Petition by observing that the petitioner failed to obtain a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, therefore, the objection raised by the Judgment Debtor was considered and the petitioner is directed to obtain succession … purposes as the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be the Civil Court under Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC and Section 22(3) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.4. The petitioner further contended that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1982

Alagammal and ors. Vs. Rakkammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-18-1982

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Succession Act - 1925 - Sections 57, 63, 213, 228 and 270

Reported in : AIR1982Mad354; (1991)IIMLJ86

cross-objections.24. Appeal dismissed. Family - genuineness of Will - Section 114 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Hindu Succession Act, 1925 - Will attestor claimed to be friend and neighbour of Will executor - attestor unable to produce evidence … or legatee. In addition, it was the further submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that S. 228 of the Indian Succession Act does not compel the obtaining of a Probate and that, therefore, the court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2005

Balan Vs. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-08-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 207 and 207(1); Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10(1); Madhya Pradesh Letters Patent Act; Bombay Letters Patent Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 2(14), 23(3), 24, 104, 105, 141 and 151; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B; Patna Letters Patent Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107 and 223; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 225, 227 and 228; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Delhi Rent Control Act; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 39 and 108; Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Patents Act - Sections 104; Specific Relief Act - Sections 8; Karnataka High Court Act - Sections 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections

Reported in : AIR2006Ker58; 2006(4)CTC273; [2006(2)JCR94]; 2005(4)KLT865

even though an order passed by a single Judge of the High Court under Section 299 of the Succession Act, 1925 is not strictly a decree, it will come within the scope of judgment under Letters Patent Clause 15. … Sathyanathan Unni Nair and Ors. (1971 KLJ 421) held that order passed by a single Judge under Article 228 of the Constitution of India for withdrawing a proceeding from a lower court is appealable under Section 5(i)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial