Advanced Search Results

Balan Vs. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 207 and 207(1); Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10(1); Madhya Pradesh Letters Patent Act; Bombay Letters Patent Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 2(14), 23(3), 24, 104, 105, 141 and 151; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B; Patna Letters Patent Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107 and 223; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 225, 227 and 228; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Delhi Rent Control Act; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 39 and 108; Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Patents Act - Sections 104; Specific Relief Act - Sections 8; Karnataka High Court Act - Sections 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections

Reported in : AIR2006Ker58; 2006(4)CTC273; [2006(2)JCR94]; 2005(4)KLT865

even though an order passed by a single Judge of the High Court under Section 299 of the Succession Act, 1925 is not strictly a decree, it will come within the scope of judgment under Letters Patent Clause 15. … of such courts was regulated by the statutes passed by the sovereign legislature of the respective States. Article 225 of the Constitution provided for the continuance of these rules and statutes until other statutory provisions are made

Joginder Singh Alias Rajinder Singh Vs. Dharuv Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63

Reported in : (2003)135PLR545

evidence tendered in proof of a Will should additionally satisfy the requirement of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. If after considering the matters before it, that is, … exercise of undue influence. The reliance was placed on Lal Singh v. Surjit Singh and Ors., 1972 P.L.R. 225. 9. The learned lower appellate Court found that Dharuv Singh alone was rendering service to the testator in

R. Ray Vs. V.G. Dalvi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta City Civil Court Act, 1953 - Sections 5, 5(1), 6, 7, 9 and 9(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 20

Reported in : AIR1963Cal380,65CWN191,[1962(5)FLR154]

- (i) the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (VIII of 1890), and (ii) Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (XXXIV of 1925), in respect of succession certificates.' '(4) The City Civil Court shall not have jurisdiction to … Section 223 of the Government of India Act, 1935 and in Article 225 of the Constitution of India. The jurisdiction of the High Court, is … action arose in the city of Calcutta one of the questions debated before the Division Bench was whether Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applied to the City Civil Court or whether that Court

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been … in fact cleared by 24th December 2012. 17. On 16th January 2013, Shubhada and Vibha filed M.A. No. 225 of 2013 under Section 192 of the Indian Succession Act. That application was rejected on 12th August 2013.

In Re: Gordon Frederic Muirhead and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 300; Mysore Regulation, 1914 - Sections 85; Constitution of India - Article 225; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 57, 264 and 300(1)

Reported in : AIR1959Kant83; AIR1959Mys83; (1958)36MysLJ208

view of the law as it stood prior to the date when the Succession Act (Act XXXIX of 1925) came into force in the State of Mysore, I would also arrive at the same conclusion, namely, that … be considered, can only be in the affirmative.If we take into consideration the existing provisions of the Indian Succession Act, which came into force in the State of Mysore on the 1st of April. 1951, we find that … High Court of Mysore had jurisdiction to make such grants and Article 225 of the Constitution preserved the existing jurisdiction of all High Courts.3. One … at least, in the matter of granting probate and/or letters of administration. Section 300 of the said Act makes this position clear. It reads as

Emperor Vs. Yeshvant Satva Chaugule

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR497

fatal to the trial, where it is specified in the complaint and found by the Court. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … whatever on this head; an entirely different common object has been charged. Our attention has been called to Section 225 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which provided that ' no error in stating the particulars, required to

Jagdish Chandra Trikha Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyFamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)753; AIR1998Delhi266; 4(1996)CLT513; [2000]100CompCas839(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT874

necessary to obtain letters of administration in terms of the provisions of Sections 211 and 212 of the Succession Act, 1925 and cases which are of relevance and as cited above may now be referred.(19) In Jogendra Chunder Dutt … basis thereof.The question of supplying a copy of the indemnity bond,therefore, does not arise.Sd/-MANAGER'Reference is also made to Section 16 of the Limitation Act which reads as follows:'16. Effect of death on or before the accrual of … follows :(i) S. No. Description of articles Quantity Weight in Tolas1. Gokhroos 2252. 'Churian' 8 403. Bangle 8 54. Other Bangles 12 75. Phul-Churian 2

Darjus Jehangir Vs. Lyla Minoo Ghasvalla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Successions Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 75, 82, 83, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2000Bom372; 2000(2)ALLMR32; 2000(3)BomCR447; (2000)2BOMLR108

Mr. Bookwala had relied upon sections 74, 75, 82, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Mr. Bookwala has relied on the decisions in the cases of (i) Re. Rowland & another 1963 CD … been made to respondent No. 1 and conditional in some of the others. Mr. Bookwala had relied upon sections 74, 75, 82, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Mr. Bookwala has

In Re: Anthony Fernandes and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2 and 390; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(4)

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR580

Shri Bapat saw me in Chamber and invited my attention to the standard commentary of Paruck's. The Indian Succession Act, 1925 (7th Edition) at page 613 reading inter alia as under :'Bombay Regulation No. VIII of 1827 is not … 372 of the Constitution of India and the same is not yet repealed expressly or by necessary implication. Section 390 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 provides that the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 listed in … by section 223 of the Government of India Act 1935 and Article 225 of the Constitution of India. The High Court of Bombay in its

Fazal Ali Vs. Amna Khatun and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 2002; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : II(2004)ACC655; 2005ACJ29; AIR2004Raj39; 2005(1)KLT828; RLW2004(3)Raj1454; 2004(1)WLC339

the judgment of the learned single Judge of the High Court filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925? In the said case, the application for probate was rejected by the Original Court. The applicant preferred an … motion stage, a question of wide ramification arises for consideration is whether the Special Appeal filed under Article 225 of the Constitution of India against the judgment of a learned single Judge passed in an appeal preferred