Advanced Search Results

Crystal Developers Vs. Smt. Asha Lata Ghosh (Dead) Through Lrs. and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 59, 61, 63, 211, 211(1), 212, 213, 213(1), 214, 216, 218, 218(1), 218(2), 219, 220, 221, 222, 227 235, 263, 273, 278, 297, 307, 317 and 332; ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; ;Evidence Act - Sections 41 and 68; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 3B; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 234; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2004SC4980; 2005(1)ALD1(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)64; (2005)1CALLT45(SC); 2004(5)CTC121; JT2004(9)SC64; (2004)4MLJ172(SC); 2004(8)SCALE390; (2005)9SCC375

adopted the arguments advanced on behalf of defendant No. 14 and submitted that under section 211 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the estate of the deceased testator vests in the executor from the date the will becomes enforceable, i.e. … It inter alia states that letters of administration entitles the administrator to all rights belonging to the intestate. Section 221 inter alia states that letters of administration shall not render valid any intermediate acts of the administrator which

V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. Vs. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) Thr. Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

life estate holder. In this context, no doubt, we must clarify one aspect. Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the “Indian Succession Act’, for short) deals with the date of vesting of legacy

Manek Dara Sukhadwalla Vs. Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Corporation of India V/s. United Industrial Bank. 23. Ms. Sethna then submitted that the scheme of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 stipulates that powers granted to an executor of a Will are not liable to be circumscribed except in … Will are not liable to be circumscribed except in rare circumstances. Ms. Sethna relied on the provisions of sections 221, 222, 227, 229, 305 to 308 and 316 to 331 of the Succession Act in support of

H.C. Ramaswamy Iyengar and ors. Vs. H.C. Lakshminarasimhan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 276; Estate Duty Act - Sections 60; Hindu Wills Act - 1870

Reported in : AIR1965Kant87; AIR1965Mys87

death as provided by section 220 of the Succession Act although according to the next succeeding section viz., section 221, letters of administration do not render valid any immediate acts of the administrator tending to the diminution or … ORDER1. This petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act relates to the estate of one H. Channkeshava Iyengar who was a permanent resident of the City of … by the Lahore High Court reported in Gurbachan v. Satwant Kaur, AIR 1925 Lah 493 and Satpal Ram v. Collector, Multan, AIR 1931 Laj 310.(19)

Mohamed Salman Noorani and Others Vs. Radhika Bhargava and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

defendant No.10. It was submitted that in terms of Section 211 read with Section 307 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (said Act), there is no bar to an executor dealing with the property which is subject matter of … an administrator derives his rights from the grant of Letters of Administration by the Court. By reference to Section 221 of the Act, it has been held that certain intermediate acts of the Administrator are not protected as

Jiban Roy Choudhury Vs. Sm. Taramoyee Debi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1979Cal339

property as provided in the will in terms of the will as also Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The concept of 'full owner' in Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 used in the context … suit on March 23, 1973 for recovery of possession of portion of the ground floor of premises No. 221/6A, Rash Behari Avenue, P.S. Ballygunge, Calcutta which defendant held as a monthly tenant at a monthly rent of

G.F.F. Foulkes and ors. Vs. A.S. Suppan Chettiar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 20, Rule 13 and 13(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 307, 307(1), 323 and 360; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 68 and 93

Reported in : AIR1951Mad296; (1950)2MLJ220

rateably, any rights enforceable against the creditors who have been paid in full or in excess Section 323, Succession Act, 1925, replaced Section 282, Succesaion Act, 1865, and Section 104, Probate and Administration Act, 1881. Section 282, Succession Act, … due to defendant 5, under two decrees in O. Section No. 359 of 1946 and O. Section No. 221 of 1941 respectively on the file of the District Munsifs Court, Madura, in respect of which he had

S. Kanthimathy, S. Lakshmi, S. Vs. the Woodlands Estates Limited and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)144CompCas830

which may be condoned by invoking the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 5.9 The Indian Succession Act, 1925 does not confer executive jurisdiction on civil courts to interpret any Will, but only in respect of probate

JahiruddIn Vs. K.D. Rathi, Factory Manager, the Model Mills Nagpur Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1966SC907; [1966(12)FLR196]; (1966)ILLJ430SC; [1966]2SCR660

the ambit of s. III of the Regulation. Since the courts have now ample powers under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Code of Civil Procedure, these provisions of the Regulation are out of date and should be … no question of giving retrospective effect to the Act arose. At p. 221, the learned Chief Justice, Harries, who spoke for the Court stated thus … 25, 1960 the State of Bombay (now the State of Maharashtra), in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 3 and 4 of the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Bombay

Manjula Banerjee vs.state and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J.1. This first appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is filed by the sister and who was the respondent No.4 in the probate petition filed by respondent … justice gave one opportunity to the appellant to complete her evidence. This order dated 3.4.2013 in C.M. (M) 221/2013 reads as under:-"“CM(M) No.221/2013 FAO No.386/2014 Page 5 of 20 1. The main grievance of the petitioner is