Advanced Search Results

Dinbai Behramji Gonda Vs. Motibai Burjorji Chhor

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR770

who is not a Hindu, Mahomedan, Buddhist, Sikh or Jain, is determined by Section 219 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Sub-clause (c) provides that if there is no widow, or if the Court sees cause to exclude the

Hirjibhoy Rustomji Patel Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 219 and 259; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR1953Bom228; (1953)55BOMLR122; ILR1953Bom748

under Section 259 'de bonis non' to issue to the appellant.(6) Appeal allowed. Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Sections 259, 219 - Letters of administration de bonis non--Estate not fully administered--Counsel appearing as amicus curiae--Whether costs … the whole judgment proceeds on a fallacy and on a misapprehension of the correct effect of Section 259, Succession Act. That section provides that 'in granting letters of administration of the estate not fully administered, the Court shall

Crystal Developers Vs. Smt. Asha Lata Ghosh (Dead) Through Lrs. and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 59, 61, 63, 211, 211(1), 212, 213, 213(1), 214, 216, 218, 218(1), 218(2), 219, 220, 221, 222, 227 235, 263, 273, 278, 297, 307, 317 and 332; ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; ;Evidence Act - Sections 41 and 68; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 3B; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 234; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2004SC4980; 2005(1)ALD1(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)64; (2005)1CALLT45(SC); 2004(5)CTC121; JT2004(9)SC64; (2004)4MLJ172(SC); 2004(8)SCALE390; (2005)9SCC375

adopted the arguments advanced on behalf of defendant No. 14 and submitted that under section 211 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the estate of the deceased testator vests in the executor from the date the will becomes enforceable, i.e. … any intermediate acts of the administrator which acts diminish or damage the estate of the intestate. Sections 218, 219, 220 and 221 are relevant in the present case as they indicate that nothing prevented the intestate heirs

MA I Kovoor @ Anna Kovoor Vs. Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Jr.) and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

the same is accordingly, dismissed. No costs, Copy of this order be sent to all concerned parties. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 47 Section 219 Section 278 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Indian Registration Act, 1908 Grant of Letter of

Sreemanthula Kesavachari (Died) Per L.R. Sreemanthula Rajeswaramma Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214 and 214(1); Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 22(3); Administrator General's Act, 1913 - Sections 31 and 32; Succession Certificate Act, 1889; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 219 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 51

Reported in : AIR2008AP74; 2007(6)ALD796; 2008(1)ALT1

Petition by observing that the petitioner failed to obtain a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, therefore, the objection raised by the Judgment Debtor was considered and the petitioner is directed to obtain succession … for all purposes as the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be the Civil Court under Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC and Section 22(3) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.4. The petitioner further contended

Benoy Kumar Mondal Vs. Panchanon Majumdar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 48 and 219

Reported in : AIR1956Cal177,60CWN598

parties agree that Panchanon's claim to the letters1 of administration would depend upon his eligibility under Section 219, Succession Act which admittedly applies to this case. Under the terms of that section, a person to be entitled to … light of the Relevant provisions of law.7. Under Section 29 of the present Succession Act (Act 39 of 1925) (which, it may be incidentally stated in its two Sub-sections (1) and (2) corresponds to old Sections 331

Rajanikant Mansukhlal Vs. Kiko Ratilal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932Bom506; (1932)34BOMLR1124; 140Ind.Cas.206

of the land were demonstrative legacies and fell within Section 150 and not Section 142 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 :;Calow v. Calow [1928] 1 Ch. 710, Page v. Leapingwell (1812) 18 Ves. Jun. 463, and Fryer v. … expiry of one year from the testator's death, see In re Walford, Kenyon v. Walford [1912] 1 Ch. 219 and the same is the law in India, of Chinnam v. Tadikonda I.L.R. (1905) Mad. 155 and Administrator-General

CaptaIn Jagdish Chandra Varshney Vs. Smt. Muni Varshney and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR2006All347

as preliminary issue to be decided before framing further issues;Whether in view of Section 236 of the Indian Succession Act 1925, 'Letters of Administration' can be granted of the estate of the deceased to a registered society.2. Heard Shri … creditor of the deceased. Where the deceased is not Hindu; Mohammadan; Budhist; Sikh; Jain or exempted persons, Sections 219 provides for grant of letters of administration to the persons, who are connected with him, either by marriage

N. Namberumal Chetti Vs. Veeraperumal Pillai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1930Mad956; (1930)59MLJ596

the legacy as administrator of Aparanji's estate, from establishing his claim to the legacy?13. Section 213 (1), Indian Succession Act, 1925, says:No right as executor or legatee can be established in any Court of Justice, unless a Court of … establish any right of his but only to fix an obligation on him. Vide Williams on Executors, page 219. It must be remembered that the 1st defendant actually entered upon his duties as executor, applied for probate

In Re: Sarah Ezra

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1931Cal560

to the caveator.3. Now it would appear at first sight clear that, under the terms of Section 219, Succession Act, 1925, the applicant is entitled to the grant prayed, if the deceased was a person subject to Part 5