Advanced Search Results

Worldwide Agencies (P) Ltd. and Another Vs. Margaret T Desor and Other ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(27), 41, 109, 114, 155, 397, 398 and 433

Reported in : [1990]67CompCas589(Delhi)

Act, it is not necessary for us to decide whether in view of section 220 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the letters of administration and the Reserve Bank of India permission which is linked with it will relate … Article 28 is in pari materia with article 32 of Table A of the English Companies Act. 21. Section 210 of the English Companies Act, before its amendment in 1980, is substantially the same as section 397 of

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROBATE OF A WILL, OR LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION, OR COURT DECREE (AS MAY BE APPLICABLE), UNDER THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 (10 OF1925 (ATTACH A COPY) 5. THE LATEST AND COMPLETE COPY OF THE FINANCIAL CONTRACT REFLECTING ALL AMENDMENTS … been defined in Section 3(21), as a person who is registered with the Board as information utility under Section 210. The word ‘Board’ has been defined in Section 3(1) to be the ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India’

Chandramohan Vs. Shanmugavalli

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Evidence Act - Section 63, 68, 69, 70, 65(c), 90; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 59, 63(c); Registration Act 1908 - Section 52, 60

statutory requirements of proving the Will. A Will must be proved in terms of Section 63(c) of the Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872. In the event the provisions thereof cannot be complied with,

Zarina @ Taushida Latif Qureshi Vs. Dilip Modji Donakia and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

not established. 40. The Petitioner has no locus to challenge the probate. The Petition is dismissed with costs. Succession Act, 1925 - Section 264, 300 – Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 50, 60 – Cases Referred: 1. Beant Singh … SC 601 (Para 36). Comparative Citations: 2012 (5) MAH.L.J 863, 2012 (6) BCR 348, 2013 (1) ALL MR 210

G. Ramachandran and ors. Vs. V. Doraiswamy and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 152; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3670

her as the same is hit by ademption. Ademption has been explained in Section 152 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The provision reads:'Section 152 Ademption explained -If anything which has been specifically bequeathed does not belong to the … or re-agitated.A similar set of I As have been filed in Revision Petition H R R P No. 210/2000. There is no need to state in detail the I As filed in H R R P No.

Prakash P. Bambardekar Vs. Avinash Vishvanath Ajgaonkar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

By this petition filed under section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, petitioner seeks revocation of Letter of Administration issued by this Court to the respondent on 15th June, 2009 … Letter of Administration issued by this Court to the respondent on 15th June, 2009 in Testamentary Petition No. 210 of 2009 and also seeks an order and direction against the respondent to handover possession of flat No.

Champa Poojari Vs. Manji Poojarthi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is “Wasiyat”. The definition of the term “Will” has been given in Section 2 (h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as follows: “(h) “will” means the legal declaration of the intention of a testator with respect to his … OF2012(PAR) BETWEEN: CHAMPA POOJARI, S/O BACHA POOJARI, AGE:48. YEARS, R/O HONEHALLI VILLAGE, BARKUR POST, UDUPI TALUK - 576 210. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI M.J.ALVA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI NAGARAJA HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND:1. MANJI POOJARTHI, D/O BACHA POOJARI, AGE:65 YEARS,

Michael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … judgment of this court in case reported in 20 Indian Decisions BOM 210 (Full Bench) and the judgment of Supreme Court in case of Namburi

Michael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … judgment of this court in case reported in 20 Indian Decisions BOM 210 (Full Bench) and the judgment of Supreme Court in case of Namburi

Manoj Karam Vs. Ram Tuljiram Shahani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

that (i) There is a distinction between the provisions of Section 211 and Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 213 provides that no right as executor or legatee can be established unless a Court of competent jurisdiction … under the will of the Third Defendant. On 7 January 2011, an execution proceeding was filed (Execution Application 210 of 2011)for seeking the execution of the Consent Terms in relation to the flat at Shyam Nivas. The