Advanced Search Results

Sm. Daljit Kaur, B.A., B.T. Vs. S. Tarlok Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 192, 209 and 299

Reported in : AIR1953All707

4. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Civil - dismissal of application - Sections 192 and 209 of Succession Act, 1925 - appellant filed an application under Section 192 with District Judge, Rampur - appeal dismissed on the ground

Baijnath Das Vs. Mahant Ramdeo Das Chela Mahant Kashi Das Deceased

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 192, 209 and 299

Reported in : AIR1953All663

fails and is dismissed with costs. Civil - Order of District Judge - Sections 299,192 and 209 of Succession Act, 1925 - only Order made by the District Judge by virtue of power given under the Act are appealable … if he did pass an order under Section 192, the appellant would have had to satisfy us that Section 209 does not apply to it. Section 209 provides that:'The decision of a District Judge in a summary proceeding

Uma Devi Nambiar and ors. Vs. T.C. Sidhan (Dead)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 192 to 195, 208 and 209; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR2004SC1772; 2004(1)BLJR583; (SCSuppl)2004(2)CHN56; 2004(2)CTC287; [2004(3)JCR208(SC)]; JT2003(10)SC470; 2004(2)KLT75(SC); (2004)3MLJ7(SC); 2003(10)SCALE624; (2004)2SCC32

case at hand is no exception. In a proceeding initiated under Sections 192 to 195 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 (for short the 'Act') validity and genuineness of a Will was decided by the District Court, Kozhikode and … questioned before the higher court. The decision is not one on title but on the question of possession. Section 209 deals with the fate of such decision. Strong reliance was placed on Clarence Pais and Ors. v. Union

Rupali Mehta Vs. Smt. Tina Narinder SaIn Mehta

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 192, 193, 194, 195, 208, 209, 217, 247, 268, 269 and 269(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 141 - Order 21 Rule 63 - Order 39

Reported in : AIR2007Bom62; 2006(6)ALLMR48; 2006(6)BomCR778; 2006(6)MhLj786

Birla v. Laxmi Devi Newar and Anr. : 2005(4)CHN544 . 5. Perusal of the preamble of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 shows that the Act has been enacted to consolidate the law applicable to intestate and testamentary succession. The … remedy by a suit and not by an application for revision. This remedy is preserved by Section 208. Section 209 makes the position further clear. It provides that the decision of a District Judge in a summary proceeding

Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Another Vs. Ashok Jagjivan Gokal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned counsel placed reliance on Sections 192, 193, 301, 317 and 318 of Indian Succession Act 1925 in support of his submission that respondent Nos.1 and 2 who have acted contrary to the interest of … remedy by a suit and not by an application for revision. This remedy is preserved by Section 208. Section 209 makes the position further clear. It provides that the decision of a District Judge in a summary proceeding

Zafar Khan and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue, U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10, 144 and 144(1)

Reported in : AIR1985SC39; 1984(2)SCALE135; 1984Supp(1)SCC505; [1985]1SCR287; 1984(16)LC1110(SC)

the ambit of s. III of the Regulation. Since the courts have now ample powers under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Code of Civil Procedure, these provisions of the Regulation are out of date and should be … for obtaining relief Under Section 144 of the CPC, the appellants filed Suit No. 73 of 1967 Under Section 209 and 229(b) of the 1950 Act against the respondents in August, 1966. In this suit they claimed a

Shri Mahanth Chandramani Das Vs. Shri Ram Rajeshwar Das and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Family

Both the appeals are accordingly disposed of. Consolidated hearing fee of Rs. 250/-.B.N. Agrawal, J.I agree. (A) Indian Succession Act, 1925, Sections 61 and 218 - Will- Execution of--Granting of letters of administration--Refusal of--Legality--Without any evidence to show that … so far as the possession is concerned, the decision becomes final. It has been pointed out that under Section 209 of the Indian Succession Act the decision is not fit to be challenged. Section 209 of the Indian

N. Namberumal Chetti Vs. Veeraperumal Pillai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1930Mad956; (1930)59MLJ596

the legacy as administrator of Aparanji's estate, from establishing his claim to the legacy?13. Section 213 (1), Indian Succession Act, 1925, says:No right as executor or legatee can be established in any Court of Justice, unless a Court of … English cases of Graham v. Drummond (1896) 1 Ch. 968 and Taylor v. Hawkins (1803) 8 Ves. Jun. 209: 32 E.R. 334 held that an alienee with notice of the fact that the executor was using it

Mariyaya Chanviraya Hiremath Vs. Shantirappa Danappa Nelvigi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1939Bom338; (1939)41BOMLR575

v. Cowasjee Dadabhoy (1924) I.L.R. 48 Bom. 348 : S.C. 26 Bom. L.R. 209, commented on. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Emperor Vs. Varjivandas Alias Kalidas Bhaidas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1904)ILR27Bom54

for trial at the Sessions of the High Court--Practise--Procedure--Sufficient ground for committing for trial, what is. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … Bhaidas to show cause why the order passed by Mr. Binning, Acting Chief Presidency Magistrate, discharging him under Section 209 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), should not be set aside and why he should