Advanced Search Results

Vishalakshi Vs. Bank of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 30, 192 to 207, 208, 212, 213 and 370 to 390; General Clauses Act

Reported in : AIR2006Ker255; 2006(2)KLT488

V. Ramkumar, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 the petitioner who is the sole legal heir and successor of deceased P.K. Hymavathy, challenges the order dated … approaching the court for the grant of a Succession Certificate. (See Janaki v. Kesavalu - ILR 8 Madras 207). If a Succession Certificate has been issued to a person not entitled to the same, it can be

Lalitha Christian Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the subject land was Government land; (vi) that there was an amendment to Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and sub-Section (2) thereof categorically stated that sub-Section (1){which required a probate to be obtained in regard to … v. Sai Krupa Homes rep. by Managing Partner, Sri Garavandulla Sambaiah S/o Lakshmaiah and Ors (2010 (6) ALD 207). 46. So it cannot also be said that on 15.10.2004, when the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Zaheerabad issued

Consolidated Pneumatic Tool Co. (i) Ltd. and Others Vs. Additional Reg ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(30), 5, 205A, 205A(1), 205A(8) and 207

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR572; [1989]65CompCas259(Bom)

be against interest of justice - case fit to exercise discretion in favour of quashing proceedings. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … the petitioner in assailing the impugned order relates to the construction of provisions of section 205A as also section 207 of the Act. Accord ing to him since there was an obstacle or prohibition by the operation of

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROBATE OF A WILL, OR LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION, OR COURT DECREE (AS MAY BE APPLICABLE), UNDER THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 (10 OF1925 (ATTACH A COPY) 5. THE LATEST AND COMPLETE COPY OF THE FINANCIAL CONTRACT REFLECTING ALL AMENDMENTS … with an insolvency professional agency as its member and registered with the Board as an insolvency professional under Section 207. Sub-Section (5) of Section 7 proclaims that when adjudicating authority is satisfied that a default has occurred and

Ashish Tewari vs G.P.Tewari and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

filed. In Sahil Marwah & Anr. v. Vikas Malhotra & Ors.9, relying on Section 237 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, it has been held that certified copy of a Will is admissible in evidence. The certified copy of … Shri J.P. Tewari purchased and acquired the following immovable properties: a. Two plots of land bearing No.206 and 207 at Shalimar Garden Extension in District Ghaziabad, U.P. b. Plot No. 25-B in Dayal Bagh Colony situated at

Jogendranath Banerjee Vs. Makhan Lal Banerjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1942Cal401

the defendant has to prove suoh person's right as legatee, he comes within the scope of Section 213, Succession Act, 1925 (Section 187 of the old Act 10 of 1865).19. In Ranjit Kumar v. Subodh Chandra : AIR1937Cal252 (D.N. Mitter … Dasi Debi ('16) 3 A.I.R. 1916 Cal. 324, Basunta Kumar v. Gopal Chunder ('15) 2 A.I.R. 1915 Cal. 207, Rani Prayag Kumari Debi v. Siva Prosad Singh ('26) 13 A.I.R. 1926 Cal. 1 at p. 407 for

Shakti Yezdani Vs. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the rigour applicable to a will for its making or the test of its validity under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. According to the ruling, S. 109A & S. 109B of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Bye-law 9.11 … It was also the appellants’ contention that nominations made under/in Jayant Shivram Salgaonkar’s MFs/shares were made as per Section 109A & 109B of Companies Act, 1956 and bye-law 9.11.7 of the Depositories Act, 1996. Section 109A and

Padmini. Vs. Easwari and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 15, 15(2)(1)(a); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68, 69

the Will (i.e) the defendants to prove the above said Will as per Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. If the primary evidence is not available, then he

D. Padmanabha Reddy (Died) Per L.Rs. Vs. Smt. G. Anasuya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47, 67 and 68; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59 and 63; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 7, Rule 8A - Order 13, Rule 2

Reported in : 2004(2)ALT418

evidence tendered in proof of a will should additionally satisfy the requirement of Section 63 of the Indian Succession act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. If after considering the matters before it, that is, … B.S.A. Swamy, J.1. The defendant in O.S.No. 207 of 1978 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirupathi is the appellant herein. Aggrieved by the judgment

Balan Vs. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 207 and 207(1); Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10(1); Madhya Pradesh Letters Patent Act; Bombay Letters Patent Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 2(14), 23(3), 24, 104, 105, 141 and 151; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B; Patna Letters Patent Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107 and 223; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 225, 227 and 228; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Delhi Rent Control Act; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 39 and 108; Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Patents Act - Sections 104; Specific Relief Act - Sections 8; Karnataka High Court Act - Sections 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections

Reported in : AIR2006Ker58; 2006(4)CTC273; [2006(2)JCR94]; 2005(4)KLT865

even though an order passed by a single Judge of the High Court under Section 299 of the Succession Act, 1925 is not strictly a decree, it will come within the scope of judgment under Letters Patent Clause 15. … State nor can it be said that on giving a plain meaning to the words used in Section 207(1) of the Act, there will be any absurdity or would make the statute offending any provisions of the