Advanced Search Results

Jalgaon Borough Municipality Vs. Khandesh Spinning and Weaving Mills C ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 73 and 206

Reported in : AIR1953Bom204; (1953)55BOMLR65; ILR1953Bom590

of coarse, be dismissed with costs.3. Appeal allowed in part;cross-objections dismissed. Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act (Bom. XVIII of 1925), Section 206 - Municipality authorised to levy octroi duty on 'oils used for machinery'--Municipality wrongly levying octroi duty on fuel … be entitled to their proportionate costs here as well as in the Court below, in proportion to their success or failure. The plaintiffs' cross-objections will, of coarse, be dismissed with costs.3. Appeal allowed in part;cross-objections dismissed. Bombay

Vithoba Babaji Narote Vs. Sholapur Municipality

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1947Bom241; (1946)48BOMLR804

favour. In the result, this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Municipal Act (Boroughs) (Bom. XVIII of 1925), Section 206 - Notice by Municipality to occupiers to quit Municipal lands-Resolution passed by Municipality that eviction to take place … plaintiffs did not leave the land. The procedure had been for the Municipality to allow the plaintiffs for successive periods of six months to stay on the land, payments being required to be made in respect of

Desai Kantilal Maganlal Vs. Nadiad Borough Municipality at Nadiad

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1961)2GLR325

District Municipal Act are thus similar to those of Section 206 and 206A of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act 1925 The construction placed on Section 167 of the District Municipal Act in this case would show that an … municipality. He argued that under Section 8 of the Act, a municipality is a body corporate with perpetual succession and which can sue and be sued in its name. A municipality, therefore, being a legal entity, a

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROBATE OF A WILL, OR LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION, OR COURT DECREE (AS MAY BE APPLICABLE), UNDER THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 (10 OF1925 (ATTACH A COPY) 5. THE LATEST AND COMPLETE COPY OF THE FINANCIAL CONTRACT REFLECTING ALL AMENDMENTS … includes an interim resolution professional. In turn Section 3(19) defines ‘insolvency professional’ as the person enrolled under 74 Section 206 with an insolvency professional agency as its member and registered with the Board as an insolvency professional under

Mahashakti Peeth Religious Endowment Trust Vs. Shelendra Pratap Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Reported in : RLW2009(3)Raj2490

Dalip Singh, J.1. This misc. appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 24.2.2006 passed by the learned District Judge, Jaipur

Durga Chand Kaushish Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 53(B)(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 53(B)(2)

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi350

Ahmedabad v. Javantilal Chhotalal Paid AIR 1948 Bom 98. While construing section 206 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act 1925 which prescribed a reduced period of liinitutiOil for suit in respect of an act done in pursuance of … of Rs. 365.00 which the plaintiff continued to pay to the Trust, and after its supersesion to its successo the Delhi Development Authority (second defendant). (3) On 3rd June 1964, a sum of Rs. 4,657.75 Paise was

Basant Chandra Ghose Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1945)47BOMLR396

merely on the ground that at some prior stage there was no valid cause for detention. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … it was a fraudulent exercise of the power. The observations in Liversidge v. Sir John Anderson (1942) A.C. 206 and Green v. Secretary of State, for Home Affairs (1942) A.C. 284 establish that the burden of substantiating

Gopal Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. the Broach Borough Municipality

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Municipal Tax

Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR300

M.C. Chagla, C.J.1. These six first appeals raise common questions of municipal taxation, under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925. We will first deal with First Appeal No. 28 of 1953 which arises out of special civil suit … 206A of the Municipal Boroughs Act. It was first urged by Mr. D.V. Patel that by reason of Section 206 a suit was not competent to challenge the imposition of tax by the municipality, and in support of … the suit and of the appeal will be in proportion to the success or failure of the parties with regard to the claim made.32. First

Anjan Chakraborty Vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

which is capable of being so disposed of by him in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 defines a Will to mean the legal declaration of the intention

Ashish Tewari vs G.P.Tewari and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

filed. In Sahil Marwah & Anr. v. Vikas Malhotra & Ors.9, relying on Section 237 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, it has been held that certified copy of a Will is admissible in evidence. The certified copy of … this will, I hereby devise, bequeath and give my plots referred to above, as under:- a) Plots no. 206 and 207 measuring 200 sq. yards and 254 sq. yards situate in Shalimar Garden, EXTN. No. 1, Ghaziabad