Advanced Search Results

Anthony Swamy Vs. Chowramma

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 295 and 299; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908; ;Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Sections 11(4) - Schedule - Articles 4 and 11(1)

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1294

case under Section 295 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 204: [Subhash B. Adi, J] Offences under Sections 384,385,389,467,468 & 506 (11) R/W Section 151 of I.P.C., Private complaint … letters of administration with the Will annexed purporting to have been filed under Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ('the Act'), while it has to be regarded as a petition filed under Section 276 of the Act.

Dinbai Behramji Gonda Vs. Motibai Burjorji Chhor

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR770

who is not a Hindu, Mahomedan, Buddhist, Sikh or Jain, is determined by Section 219 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Sub-clause (c) provides that if there is no widow, or if the Court sees cause to exclude the … Stoney (1923) I.L.R. 2 Pat. 508, in which case the learned Chief Justice in his judgment refers to Section 204 of the Indian Succession Act then in force, which corresponds to Section 219 of the present Act, and

Dulia Devi Vs. Dulia Devi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372 and 373

Reported in : AIR2001All195

certificate in favour of the opposite parties. Learned counsel has referred tothe provisions of Chapter X of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 372 provides forapplication for certificate and the particularbe mentioned in the same. Sub-section (2) ofSection 373 provides that … order dated 8-10-1999 passed by Sri Ramesh Chandra Singh, VIIth Additional District Judge, Varanasi in Succession Appeal No. 204 of 1998.2. The facts giving rise to this revision are as follows :The applicant moved an application for

Ahmedabad Municipality Vs. Mulchand

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1946Bom154; (1945)47BOMLR876

is reconstituted .vest in the Provincial Government.3. These provisions correspond to Section 219 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925. Under Section 8 of that Act the Ahmedabad Borough Municipality is a body corporate having a perpetual succession, … a perpetual succession, and it may sue or be sued in its corporate name through its Chief Officer. Section 204, Sub-section(1), empowers a borough Municipality to file a suit and to compound or compromise a suit instituted by

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been … to have been slightly varied, allowing METCO to continue routine matters relating to the estate (Ex. Q, pp. 204-205).This state of affairs seems to have continued for the next four years. In that time, the revocation petition

Mukti Dutta vs.vijay Bhushan (Deceased Through Lrs) & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the ground of the suit claim being barred by Section 263 read with Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Fourthly, on the ground of the suit claim being barred by res judicata. Fifthly, on the ground of

Vijay Bhushan & Ors vs.arya Anathalaya

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the ground of the suit claim being barred by Section 263 read with Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Fourthly, on the ground of the suit claim being barred by res judicata. Fifthly, on the ground of

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Sholapur Vs. Pantappa Sayan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939 - Sections 4(2) and 20; Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1941 - Rule 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1973Bom348; (1973)75BOMLR503; 1974MhLJ356

by notification in the Official Gazette, and further it shall have perpetual succession and a common seal, may sue and be sued in its corporate … distinguishable. That was a case where the Municipality had filed a criminal complaint against the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, for unauthorised construction of a building in the municipal area. During the pendency of this complaint, the municipality … the municipal area. During the pendency of this complaint, the municipality filed a suit against the respondent under Section 204 of the Act for an injunction restraining the respondent from occupying the said building either by himself or

R.S. Lodha Vs. Laxmi Devi Newar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 86, 278, 295 and 299; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; ;Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules - Rule 28; ;Bombay High Court Rules - Rule 692

Reported in : (2008)4CALLT370(HC)

language, of last sentence of the aforesaid Rule is almost same with that of Section 295 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The said provision still remains unchanged irrespective of new nomenclature. PLA is given at initial stage and Testamentary … Supreme Court this Court took up hearing of the Testamentary Suit being T.S. 6 of 2004 (previously PLA 204 of 2004-In the goods of Priyamvada Devi Birla, since deceased).2. Mr. A.K. Mitra appearing with Mr. P. Chatterjee,

Anthappa (Deceased) by His Testamentary L.Rs Vs. Distinappa Alias Subb ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyConstitution

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 332 and 832; Indian Succession Rules; Hindu Law; Adaptations of Law Order, 1950; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 29(2) and 392; General Clauses Act - Sections 3, 4A and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(3), 14, 15 and 372

Reported in : AIR2006Kant60; ILR2006KAR1576; 2006(1)KarLJ270

in force and full effect in view of the provisions of Section 3(1) and 3(2) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925?2. Does the notification referred to immediately herein supra stand impliedly repealed by the provisions of Section 392 of … 22-5-2000, the following substantial questions of law were raised by this Court:1. Whether the Notification dated 23-7-1868, No. 204 exempting 'all Native Christians in the State of Coorg from the operation of specified sections of the Indian