Advanced Search Results

Rani Pravabati Roy and ors. Vs. Saileshnath Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 142, 150, 202 and 214; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56

Reported in : AIR1978Cal147

v. Ashutosh Mukherjee it has been held that the Court in exercising jurisdiction under Section 202 of the Succession Act, 1925 is acting in pursuance of the testamentary and intestate jurisdiction with which it is vested and not of

Smt. Saroj Gupta W/O Dev Nath Gupta and Rama Shankar Gupta S/O Tribhuw ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 493 and 496; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 200, 202, 205, 244, 245(2), 249, 252, 256, 256(1), 302 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 259

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1045

complainant does not terminate a criminal prosecution. The maxim action personalis moritur cum persona of Section 306 of Succession Act, 1925 does not apply to criminal prosecutions 7. There is no provisions of abatement of inquiries and trials in … Ratan Gupta died on 8 5.2005 and after his death the statement of witnesses under Section 200 and 202 Cr.PC was recorded only on 22.6.2005. The statement under Section 200 and 202 Cr.PC is annexed as Annexure-6

Rajeev Miglani vs Urmil Gujral & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additionally, the Wills dated 07th April, 1988 have also not been proved as per the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (“Succession Act”).9. Per contra, the submissions put forth by respondent no. 1 are as follows:9.1. It is the … 2 in his written statement, already on record. 8.30. The reliance placed by the respondent no. 1 on Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (“Contract Act”) is misplaced. The registered GPA dated 07th April, 1988 in

Mahamaya Dassi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 26, 161, 164, 168 and 256; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 247

Reported in : [1980]126ITR748(Cal)

order to examine this question, it may be relevant to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.18. Section 2 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, provides the definition and Sub-clause (a) of Section 2 defines … in the case of Kali Kumar Chatterji v. Rash Vehari Banerji, ILR 1947 (2) Cal 195, at page 202, S. R. Das J., as his Lordship then was, observed that even with the consent of the parties

Mrs. Revathamma Vs. Hamsa and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 256, 257 and 283(1); Hyderabad High Court Rules - Rule 46

Reported in : AIR1961AP13

respondent who has been added as a party to raise a dispute. All the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925 are there for the purpose of enabling a person who wants to be present at the proceedings relating … of C. G. Srinivasulu Naidu filed O. P. No. 76/2/56 for the grant of letters of administration under Section 218 of the Indian Succession Act in the Court of the District Judge, Secunderabad for the property of … these contentions, reference is made to the caveat prescribed in Form No. 202 which is in the following terms: 'Let nothing be done in the

Western India theatres Ltd. Vs. Associated Bombay Cinemas Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 202; High Court Rules - Rule 733

Reported in : [1959]29CompCas127(Bom)

matter remitted back with direction to pass necessary Order after considering contentions of plaintiff and appellants. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … the preliminary point raised by Mr. K. T. Desai for the respondents is that no appeal lies under section 202 of the Companies Act and that the order made by the learned Judge is a purely procedural order

Sunita Gangwal vs.chottey Lal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

making the will, by operation of law, the will stands revoked. (see Sections 69 and 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925). Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.16. We therefore reiterate that immovable property can … satisfy the requirement of relevant provisions of law being Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and which aspects are satisfied in the facts of the present case

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Krishi Export Com. Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

to be carried out after his death. 'Will' has been defined in Section 2 (h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to mean a legal declaration of the intention of the testator with respect to his property which he … the above precedents and on the basis of Section 53- A of the T. P. Act read with Section 202 of the Contract Act proceeds to protect the right and interest of the prospective purchasers on the strength

M/S Gupta International & Ors vs.ashok Kumar Singhal & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

making the will, by operation of law, the will stands revoked. (see Sections 69 and 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925). Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.16. We therefore reiterate that immovable property can … Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and also that a power of attorney given for consideration is irrevocable under Section 202 of CS(COMM) No.1666/2016 Page 24 of 30 the Indian Contract Act, 1872 , and in the present case,

Jai Singh Kanwar & Ors. Vs.anil Goel

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

testator, who is not married, marries after making the will, by operation of law, the will stands Indian Succession Act, 1925). Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.16. We therefore reiterate that immovable property can … irrevocable right of a person holding a power of attorney given for consideration coupled with interest as per Section 202 of the Contract Act, 1872 (para13) and devolution of interest pursuant to a Will (para 14). Therefore, no