Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 201 · Page 1 of about 147 results (0.048 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 1932

Rajanikant Mansukhlal Vs. Kiko Ratilal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-1932

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932Bom506; (1932)34BOMLR1124; 140Ind.Cas.206

of the land were demonstrative legacies and fell within Section 150 and not Section 142 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 :;Calow v. Calow [1928] 1 Ch. 710, Page v. Leapingwell (1812) 18 Ves. Jun. 463, and Fryer v. … in India, of Chinnam v. Tadikonda I.L.R. (1905) Mad. 155 and Administrator-General v. A.D. Christiana I.L.R. (1915) Cal. 201 If Section 351 of the Indian Succession Act applies the plaintiff will be entitled to interest from the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1991

Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Parshottam Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT263

thereafter a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') was filed by respondent No. I on the basis of a will, dated 9th … Lahore High Court also took a similar view in a Division Bench judgment reported as Air 1933 Lah 201, Umrao Singh v. Baldev Singh and Another, holding that where a Hindu testator declared in a will that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1993

Hanuman and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-25-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302 and 307

Reported in : AIR1994SC1307; 1994CriLJ2092; 1994Supp(2)SCC39

offender from legal punishment - conviction of appellants under Section 201 set aside - appeal allowed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Sections 74 & 82 :[S.B.Sinha & V.S.Sirpurkar,JJ] Construction of Will Recourse to Arm chair rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 1974

Sirinbai D. Daruwala Vs. Edalji Dhanjisha Anklesaria

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-14-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Ahmedabad City Civil Court Rules - Rule 199

Reported in : AIR1975Guj102; (1975)0GLR204

now. The writ is ordered to be expedited.29. Order accordingly. (i) Civil - probate - Section 299 of Succession Act, 1925 and Rule 199 of Ahmedabad City Civil Court Rules - whether Trial Judge justified in rejecting appellant's prayer … for probate filed by the respondent, as a suit, and to treat the same as such under Rule 201 of Ahmedabad City Civil Court Rules. The order which is attacked in this matter is passed by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2005

Kasinath Patel Vs. Radha Bai and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD859; 2005(4)ALT740

original owner of the suit land. He died issueless. According to him, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 if a Hindu husband dies issueless, his wife alone succeeds to his estate. As defendant No. 1's husband … Will Ex.B9 as attesting witnesses, only one attesting witness has been examined, and as per the provisions of Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 at least

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2010

Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 - Section 2; ;Arms Act - Sections 24, 25 and 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307 and 308; ;Punjab Excise Act - Sections 1, 14, 61, 68; ;Evidence Act - Sections 8, 9, 27, 35, 106, 145, 157, 161 and 165; ;Advocates Act, 1961; ;Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 16; ;Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act, 1996; ;Interception of Communications Act, 1985 - Section 6; ;Indian Police Act, 1861 - Section 3; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Section 22; ;Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 2(2) and 18; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 24, 91, 145, 154, 161, 162, 162(1), 161(3), 162, 162(3), 164, 165, 170 to 173, 173(5), 17

Reported in : 2010(3)LC1650(SC)

did not succeed in discharging its onus of removing the suspicious circumstances surrounding Will. Appeal dismissed.-- B. Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 63 & - Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68 -Will -Suspicious Circumstances - Held, In a case where testator's … imprisonment for three months. He was further sentenced to undergo imprisonment for four years for the offence under Section 201/120B IPC together with a fine of Rs. 2,000 and, in default, to further undergo imprisonment for three months.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2007

Madhukar Rajanna Darbhe Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-22-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 57, 213, 213(1) and 213(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 118 and 119; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 331; Hindu Disposition of Property Act, 1916; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR339; 2008(2)BomCR418

challenged in these 2 Writ Petitions on the ground that provisions of Section 57(a) and (b) of Indian Succession Act, 1925, violate Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India with prayer to hold that Probate is required … and balances' inherent in such scheme.In Greater Bombay Co-op. Bank v. United Yarn Pvt. Ltd. JT 2007 (5) 201 SC, Hon'ble Apex Court in para 74 states:The constitutional validity of an Act can be challenged only on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2007

M.K. Srinivasan and Kannan Vs. Rangarajan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-28-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 265, 266, 270, 273, 278, 286, 295, 299, 384(1), 388, 388(1) and 388(2); Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Sections 87; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 23; Punjab Civil Courts Act, 1918 - Sections 30; Central Provinces Courts Act, 1917 - Sections 19; Bombay Civil courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A; Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 29(1); Madras City Civil Courts Act, 1892; Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 12, 13, 29, 29(1), 29(2) and 29(3); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 4(2); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2004; Bombay Civil Courts [Extension and Amendment] Act, 1958 - Sections 8; Succession Certificate Act - Sections 26; Chenna

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ435

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar v. Rengammal, wherein at pages 321 to 323, it is observed as follows:.The Indian Succession Act, 1925, is a consolidating stature which repealed and re-enacted several statutes which dealt with succession to and protection of … of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukkazhukundram, which has no jurisdiction to try the testamentary succession, as per Section 2[bb] of the Indian Succession Act and prayed for passing necessary orders to call for the original petition … District Court under this Section.' In Ananthamathi v. Ratnavathi AIR 1977 Karnataka 201, it is held that 'the Munsifs Court in South Kanara District has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2013

Annamma John Vs. Ligi Zacharia

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-10-2013

Subject : Education

decree, the 1st respondent was bound to produce a succession certificate as required under Sec.214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, "the Act"). OP(C) No.116/201”3. It is contended by the learned counsel that Ext.A1, Will is not … that to execute the decree, the 1st respondent was bound to produce a succession certificate as required under Sec.214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, "the Act"). OP(C) No.116/201”3. It is contended by the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1991

Smt. Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Dr. Parshottam Lal and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 87, 82, 114, 138, 276 and 278; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 63 and 68; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi134

thereafter a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act) was filed by respondent No. I on the basis of a Will, dated 9th … Lahore High Court also took a similar view in a Division Bench judgment reported as AIR 1933 Lah 201, Umrao Singh v. Baldev Singh holding that where a Hindu testator declared in a will that his three

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial