Advanced Search Results

ishwarsingh S/O Chunnusingh and ors. Vs. Krishnabai W/O Chunnusingh an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 196, 197 and 205; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR156; (1995)97BOMLR200

section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to a proceeding instituted under Chapter VII of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.2. Ishwarsingh Chunnusingh and five others submitted an application purporting to be under sections 192 and 195 of the … the provisions of section 470(4) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (identical with sub-section (5) of section 378 of 1973 Code). Though the section started with a mandate that no application shall be entertained after the expiry of

Late Sh Harendra Pal Singh the Lrs & Ors. Vs.rishi Pal Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

between “vested interest” and “contingent interest” as well as distinction between Sections 119 and 120 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, on the question of Will or settlement, had come up for consideration before the Supreme Court with reference … of 24 been held that Chandra Kala and even Padma Singh were bound by the said compromise agreement.21. Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 reads as under:-"“14. Property of a female Hindu to be her … 72/2016 Page 17 of 24 Court, namely, Gangaraju Vs. Pendyala Somanna, AIR1927Madras 197, Venkatasubramaniya Iyer Vs. Srinivasa Iyer, AIR1929Madras 670 and Ramaswami Naidu Vs. M.S.

Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCriminal

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 29; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 407(3);

Reported in : [1984]55CompCas81(Delhi); 1982CriLJ2230; ILR1983Delhi419

by the learned Judge that in case of a continuing offence a succession of complaints must be continued to be filed. I have had an … clause Twelfth. (4) The Super Bazar was a 'body corporate' established in pursuance of the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 but was not a Corporation, established by or under the statute within the meaning of the said clause … Undertakings) Act, 1970 (herein the Banks Act). They cannot be prosecuted without sanction of the Central Government Under section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code , (6) It was on these grounds that the prosecutions were sought to

Hem Singh Vs. Mahant Basant Das

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1936)38BOMLR479

v. The Collector, Rangoon (1912) L.R. 39 I.A. 197 : s.c. 14 Bom. L.R. 833, distinguished. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

M.B. Ramesh (D) by Lrs. Vs. K.M. Veeraje Urs (D) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

had also signed the will in her presence. Thus, the requirement of Section 63 (c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (‘Succession Act’ for short) was not fulfilled viz. that two or more witnesses have to see the testator … filed in the Court of Principal Civil Judge at Mandya, and which was numbered as Suit No.32 of 1975. They prayed for a declaration of their title to the suit property, and for a permanent injunction restraining

Premakumari.R. vs O.K.Sivasankara Pillai

Court : Kerala

Additional District Court, Ernakulam, in O.S.No.27 of 2011. The proceedings were initiated under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act 1925. The defendants resisted the original petition denying the execution of the Will, and thus, the proceedings were converted … THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 14TH POUSHA, 1945 RFA NO. 197 OF 2013 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 27/2011 OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/DEFENDANT NO.3: PREMAKUMARI.R.

N.P. Saseendran versus N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957

1959 - Art.31 - Registration Act, 1909 - s.17 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - s.2(b) - Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Part VI - ss.2(h), 59, 61, 62, 63, 70, 89 - Respondent No.1 was the plaintiff (daughter) … SCR 845 : (2021) 3 SCC 459 : (2021) 2 SCC (Civ) 197 : 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1004; Satya Pal Anand v. State of … registration of the same, would amount to acceptance of the gift and the transaction satisfies the requirement of Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Once the document is categorized as a gift, in

Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Yadvinder Thakur and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 278, 291 and 301; Trusts Act - Sections 71, 73 and 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(4), 9, 92 and 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 22, Rule 4 and 4(4)

Reported in : (2006)143PLR799

of Seth Bhagirath Das, were also impleaded as respondents. In this petition filed under Section 278 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short, 'the Act, 1925'), for the grant of letters of administration of the Will dated 21.1.1985, read … this purpose. Reference was made to the judgment reported as Maganlal Parikshawala v. Samson Shalom A.I.R. 1938 Allahabad 197. Hence it was prayed that application for removal of trustees be dismissed.Controverting this submission, learned Counsel for the

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Others Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

AIR 1933 Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun and ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas and ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held that - the position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of … till possession is taken by the Administrator.” Aggrieved appeals being APO No 153 of 2006 and APO No 197 of 2006 were preferred. By judgment and order dated 11th October, 2007 the Division Bench set aside the

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and ors. Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

h) AIR 193.Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun & ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas & ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held thatthe position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of a receiver, … till possession is taken by the Administrator.”. Aggrieved appeals being APO No 153 of 2006 and APO No 197 of 2006 were preferred. By judgment and order dated 11th October, 2007 the Division Bench set aside the