Advanced Search Results

Vrandavanla Goverdhanlal Pitti and anr. Vs. Kamala Bai Goverdhanlal an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59 to 190, 211, 213, 222 and 237 to 260

Reported in : AIR1970AP109

amended by Act XXI of 1870) corresponding to the sections set out in Schedule III of the Indian Succession Act 1925 were made applicable to all wills and codicils specified in clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 wherever … to immoveable property situate within those limits'. A reading of these provisions would show that Sections 59 to 190 with the modifications specified in Schedule III will be applicable to all wills specified in Section 57 Clauses

P.A.T. Subbaraya Pillai Vs. Vaheesan, Minor and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 102, 152, 180 and 190

Reported in : AIR1963Mad405

of 1958 are also dismissed with costs. Family - partition - Sections 102, 152, 180 and 190 of Succession Act, 1925 - appeal against Order passed by Court below regarding recovery of legacies granted under will - Section 152

Shantabai Wd/O Givindrao Ghorpade and ors. Vs. Indubai Wd/O Raghunath ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 118; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 2; Indian Succession Act, 1925

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR99; 2005(2)MhLj553

of such Will, Govindrao had no right to transfer such property, without revoking the will under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. There cannot be implied revocation. The Trial Judge, therefore, relied in AIR 1925 Patna 729. The relevant portion … the judgment and decree dated 21-6-1991 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 190 of 1990, whereby appellant original defendant's appeal was allowed and the judgment … view of this judgment passed on Order III, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, read with Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act, the Power of Attorney holder is not entitled to appear as a

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged … 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157-189 and 190.Restrictions and modifications in application of foregoing sections1. Nothing therein contained shall authorise

Ratanbai Karsetji Sunavala Vs. Narayandas Prayagdas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1927Bom478; (1927)29BOMLR900

Section 190 of Act X of 1865, which has now been superseded by Section 212 of the Indian Succession Act 1926. This section says: 'No right to any part of the property of a person who has died … the estate of Karsetji Jivaji was not represented, and under Section 212 of the Indian Succession Act of 1925 the plaintiffs could not establish any right to the deceased's property, unless letters of administration had first been

H.C. Ramaswamy Iyengar and ors. Vs. H.C. Lakshminarasimhan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 276; Estate Duty Act - Sections 60; Hindu Wills Act - 1870

Reported in : AIR1965Kant87; AIR1965Mys87

1925 Act did not apply to Hindus until the Hindu Wills Act of 1870 was passed. Even thereafter, section 190 of the Succession Act of 1865 corresponding to section 212 of the 1925 Act which makes the taking … ORDER1. This petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act relates to the estate of one H. Channkeshava Iyengar who was a permanent resident of the City of

CaptaIn Jagdish Chandra Varshney Vs. Smt. Muni Varshney and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR2006All347

as preliminary issue to be decided before framing further issues;Whether in view of Section 236 of the Indian Succession Act 1925, 'Letters of Administration' can be granted of the estate of the deceased to a registered society.2. Heard Shri … It provides for special rule for Persian intestate. The provisions dealing with testamentary succession from Section 57 to 190 are applicable to persons of all religions. The Act also provides for protection of properties of the deceased

Sm. Nandarani Mujumdar Vs. Indian Air Lines and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Section 37; ;Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857 - Section 32; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 47

Reported in : AIR1981Cal27,85CWN47

instead of an order under Sub-section (1). This provision in its turn was repealed by the Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925, Section 190 of the latter Act replaced Section 1 of the Act of 1907 again making parallel provision; Sub-section (1) … to obtain the necessary letters of administration to the estate of late Capt, Ajit Kumar Mazumdar or a succession certificate in respect of the debts due to the deceased and that they are ready and willing to

Radmacher (Formerly Granatino) (Respondent) Vs. Granatino (Appellant)

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of law clause that provided that the effects of their marriage, including the laws of matrimonial property and succession, were to be subject to the law of the Federal Republic of Germany. The main part of the … and applied to the court for maintenance pursuant to section 190(1) of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925. This gave the court the power, on any decree for divorce, to order the husband to pay maintenance.

Patel Dharamshi Premji Vs. Bai Sakar Kanji

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25, 25(1) and 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1968Guj150; (1967)GLR888

which we have quoted here were not in the corresponding Section 190 (1) of the Judicature (Consolidation ) Act, 1925, which was the previous law on the subject but even so the Courts had consistently taken the view … The operation of the rule was extended and the same principle was applied in cases decided under the successive Divorce acts in England when relief by way of dissolution of marriage by divorce was granted to the