Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 188 · Page 1 of about 123 results (0.052 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 16 2014

Mirzban Darabshaw Surti Vs. Cedric Vaz and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-16-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the doctrine of election. This is reflected inter alia in Sections 187 and 188 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: "Section 187: When acceptance of benefit given by Will constitutes election to take under Will Acceptance of a benefit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2006

Mrs. Lyla Darius Jehangir (Nee Ghaswala) Vs. Bakhtawar LentIn of Mumba ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 75, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86, 87, 88, 95, 104, 119, 187 and 188; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rules 223 and 238

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR171; 2007(1)BomCR915; (2007)109BOMLR107; 2007(1)MhLj545

to be construed by us, we deem it proper to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, particularly Chapter VI of Part VI, which deals with the construction of Wills.Section 74 says that it is … executor. Flora married George Williams in 1878; the only issue of the marriage being a son born in 1883, who lived only for a few hours. Construing Clause 11, in the backdrop of these facts, it was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1995

V.K.S. Bawa Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-29-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)56ITD232(Delhi)

completion of the administration of the will. Our attention was also invited to Section 211 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in support of the contention that the property vests in the executor though he is not the owner … Referring to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of P. Leelavalhamma v. CED [1991] 188 ITR 803 their Lordships held that though estate duty is a charge on the immovable properties passing on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 27 2012

Smt. Putuli Begum and Others Vs. Smt. Rehana Begum

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-27-2012

Subject : Education

1. Challenge in this appeal is made under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 against the order dated 15.07.2006 passed in Succession Revocation Misc. (J) Case No. 2 of 2002 whereby and … Agarwalla and Another Vs. Sri Tamizul Haque, wherein this Court while relying upon decisions reported in 33 IC 188 Uppara Hanumantha Vs. Peddapalla Samarcharlu and AIR 1972 SC 608 PC Puroshottama Vs. S Perumal, has held admissibility

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2012

Smt. Putuli Begum and Others Vs. Smt. Rehana Begum

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-27-2012

Subject : Education

1. Challenge in this appeal is made under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 against the order dated 15.07.2006 passed in Succession Revocation Misc. (J) Case No. 2 of 2002 whereby and … Agarwalla and Another Vs. Sri Tamizul Haque, wherein this Court while relying upon decisions reported in 33 IC 188 Uppara Hanumantha Vs. Peddapalla Samarcharlu and AIR 1972 SC 608 PC Puroshottama Vs. S Perumal, has held admissibility

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2016

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-2016

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROBATE OF A WILL, OR LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION, OR COURT DECREE (AS MAY BE APPLICABLE), UNDER THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 (10 OF1925 (ATTACH A COPY) 5. THE LATEST AND COMPLETE COPY OF THE FINANCIAL CONTRACT REFLECTING ALL AMENDMENTS … petitioners have approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. They call in 2 question Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the … Bankruptcy Board of India’ which is established under sub-Section (1) of Section 188.64. Section 7(6) declares that the CIRP shall commence from the date of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2023

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

any person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act shall be regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Section 21A provides a special provision in certain cases. The provision states that Sections 19, 20 (to the extent … persons mentioned in Part II of the said Schedule are within the degrees of prohibited relationship. (emphasis supplied) 188. Part I of the First Schedule consists only of women’s relationships with men, such as mother and daughter.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1952

Dowager Rani Lalitha Kumari Devi and ors. Vs. the Raja of Vizianagaram ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-25-1952

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82 and 97; Hindu Law; Madras Impartible Estates Act, 1904 - Sections 2(3), 3, 7 and 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1954Mad19

above and the parties will bear their costs throughout. Family - will - Sections 82 and 97 of Succession Act, 1925, Hindu Law, Sections 2 (3), 3, 7 and 14 of Madras Impartible Estates Act, 1904, and Section 115 … including descendants the observations of Turner J. in -- 'Wynch, ex parte, (1853) 5 D. M. & G 188 (W)', clearly show that this rule is deeply rooted in the feudal notions and conditions peculiar to England

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

Manilal Sunderji Doshi Vs. Kamal Manilal Doshi and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2013

Subject : Education

and a further conception that the testator had testamantary capacity as required under Section 59 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to execute the will. The Court may, therefore, presume the execution and attestation (See SaratChandra Mondal Vs. Panchanan … his own volition and not the record of someone else's”. 77. [See also BainbriggeVs. Browne (1881) 18 ChD 188, Wingrove Vs. Wingrove [1885] 11 PD 81, Allcard Vs. Skinner (1887) 36 ChD 145 CA, Hall Vs. Hall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial