Advanced Search Results

indrajitsinghji Vijaysinghji Vs. Rajendrasinghji Vijaysinghji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 26, 85, 86, 86(1), 86(3), 87-B and 141; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 665, 689, 690 and 692; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 235, 268 and 295; Indian Companies Act - Sections 184, 186 and 187; Government of India Act - Sections 176

Reported in : AIR1956Bom45; (1955)57BOMLR962; ILR1955Bom912

the High Court of Bombay, 1950, Rule 692--Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Sections 268, 295--Petition for letters of administration converted into suit under Rule … The question of substantive rights and the question of imposing disabilities can only be dealt with in the Succession Act which deals with these proceedings.But when these proceedings come to a Courtof law, the Court has to consider … Indian Companies Act, and the Full Bench came to the conclusion that it did apply to proceedings under Section 186 or Section 187 and not to proceedings under Section 184. With regard to Sections 186 and 187 they

Smt. Kiran Diwania Vs. Financial Commissioner, Delhi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.5) had moved an application being MPC No.47/2001 in Probate Case No.106/1991 under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for revocation of the letter of administration granted in favour of Smt. Kiran Diwania in respect of the … 23 of that Act has been obtained or is obtained subsequently, to act upon it and to invoke Section 186 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 and to refer the question of title raised by the petitioner

Mahadevia and Mehta Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal

Subject : Direct Taxation

not brought any evidence in records, for satisfaction of all the parties hereto, as envisaged by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, to become a partner in the said partnership business in place of … 1995 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) - Calcutta V, in the matter of order under section 186 r.w.s. 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, for the assessment years 1990-91,1991-92 and 1992-93. The appellant has raised a

Claude Pinto and Others Vs. M.V. Shankar Bhat and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82, 88, 211(1), 258, 259 and 307(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 99 - Order I, Rule 10(2) - Order 22, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 27; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 45; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : AIR1996Kant366; ILR1996KAR2229; 1996(3)KarLJ342

Probate and Administration Act -- V of 1881. This is found in the book 'Paruck on the Indian Succession Act 1925', 8th Edition by Salil K. Roy Choudhury and H. K. Saharay at page 601. Either any of the … in the case of Barnett Bros, Ltd. v. Fowle (AIR 1925 Rangoon 186). It is argued by the learned counsel for the appellants that if … Will should be read as a whole to ascertain the intention of the testatrix as laid down in Section 82 of the Indian Succession Act. He relied on the decision of the Privy Council in the case

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been

Mahadevia and Mehta Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)72TTJ(Cal)439

not brought any evidence in records, for satisfaction of all the parties hereto, as envisaged by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, to become a partner in the said partnership business in place of … consolidated order dated 9-10-1995, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals), Calcutta V, in the matter of order under section 186 read with section 184(7) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment years 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1992-93. The

Manubhai Chunilal Vs. the General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Cor ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : AIR1936Bom363; (1936)38BOMLR632; 165Ind.Cas.672

of the Probate and Administration Act, 1881, which are re-enacted in Sections 291 and 292 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the question is whether a suit on a bond so taken falls within Article 68 of the … estate. The other powers of this Court relating to the grant of administration bonds are now contained in Sections 291 and 292 of the Indian Succession Act of 1925, which are substantially in the same terms as … this Court by Clause 34 of the Letters Patent of June 26, 1862. It is clear, however, that the present suit is not a suit

The General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. Vs. Jan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR346

statutory assignment on proof of title to the estate. It was held that Section 292 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which provides for the assignment of administration bonds, does not deal only with the procedure in case of … Mukerji v. Al-i-Nabi I.L.R. (1911) All. 414 and In the Goods of Young (1866) L.R.1 P. & D. 186 as showing that such cases had been decided each way.]61. Pritt K.C. and S.C. Khambatta for the respondent.

Khuran Sunnath Society and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Christian Succession Act, 1092 as to whether Sections 6, 3 and 2(cc) stood wholly repealed on extension of Succession Act, 1925 to the State of Travancore Cochin by the 1951 Act. W.P(C) No.31299 of 2008 -:19. :- Although submission … proceedings of the Rajya Sabha dated December 18, 1973 (volume 86, column 186), when the bill which led to the Code of 1973 was an … it is respectfully submitted is a clear deviation from the Quranic principles. The practice currently followed among large sections of Muslims in India is that if it is a daughter she has to share the property with

Khuran Sunnath Society and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Christian Succession Act, 1092 as to whether Sections 6, 3 and 2(cc) stood wholly repealed on extension of Succession Act, 1925 to the State of Travancore Cochin by the 1951 Act. W.P(C) No.31299 of 2008 -:19. :- Although submission … proceedings of the Rajya Sabha dated December 18, 1973 (volume 86, column 186), when the bill which led to the Code of 1973 was an … it is respectfully submitted is a clear deviation from the Quranic principles. The practice currently followed among large sections of Muslims in India is that if it is a daughter she has to share the property with