Advanced Search Results

Shirish Popatlal Shah Vs. Arun Popatlal Shah

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

A Will is proved if it meets the requirements of Sections 59, 61 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 59 says that a Will can be validly made by any adult of sound mind. The testamentary or … Probate or Letters of Administration with Will Annexed (Arvind and Ors. v Indirabai and Ors., (2008) 5 Mh.L.J. 185). This proof is not required for a mere reading of the document, but to afford the Court a

Joyna John Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299/384, 276/279, 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68

1. The present appeal under section 299/384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is directed against the order dated 02.07.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge, whereby the learned Judge has … Rajesh Sharma v. Krishna Kumar Sharma, 143 (2007) DLT 216;2. Afzal-Ur-Rehman Khan v. State & Anr., 150(2008) DLT 185;3. Ashok Kumar Dua v. Ranbir Kumar Dua, 151 (2008) DLT 469;4. K.L.Malhotra v. Sudershan Kumari & Anr., 149(2008)

V. Kuppusami Pillai Vs. Jayalakshmi Ammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 154Ind.Cas.537

is not of the full interest in remainder, that disposition is void under Section 100 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865, (corresponding to Section 113 of the Succession Act of 1925) and that the plaintiff, therefore, cannot maintain … v. Ranimoni 8 Ind. Cas 1061 : 33 C 183 : 15 C.W.N. 113 : 13 Cri. L.J. 185 the legal effect of that declaration is to write that section into the Hindu Wills Act.6. The argument

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been

Sir Fazal Ibrahim Rahimtoola Vs. Appabhai G. Desai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Reported in : AIR1949Bom339; (1949)51BOMLR510

Co. v. Lakshmishankar (1904) I.L.R. 30 Bom. 173, 185, S.C. 7 Bom. L.R. 246 referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

any person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act shall be regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Section 21A provides a special provision in certain cases. The provision states that Sections 19, 20 (to the extent … to remarry. Civil society offered tremendous resistance to their attempts at reform.102 Ultimately, the Hindu Widows’ Remarriage Act 1856 was enacted, permitting widows to remarry. 102 Rosalind O’Hanlon, Issues of Widowhood in Colonial Western India (Institute of

Peoples' Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sardul Singh Caveeshar and Ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 162, 184, 185, 195 and 196; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1961P& H87

at any stage and he can suo motu examine the accounts filed under Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act (1925) so as to pass an order under clause (4) of that section. Reference may also be made to … while in others processes have been issued for recording of evidence :1. C. O. 38 of 1956, under section 185 of the Indian Companies Act; 2. C. O. 39 of 1956, under Section 185 of the Indian Companies

Anil Prakash & Anr. Vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

+ S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Sections 276 and 278 read with Sections 218 and 237 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) has been filed by the petitioners - Anil Prakash and Sunil Prakash for grant of … to 2D. ........ RESPONDENTS versus ........ Petitioners CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Sections 276 and 278 read with Sections 218 and 237 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) has

Ratanbai Karsetji Sunavala Vs. Narayandas Prayagdas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1927Bom478; (1927)29BOMLR900

the estate of Karsetji Jivaji was not represented, and under Section 212 of the Indian Succession Act of 1925 the plaintiffs could not establish any right to the deceased's property, unless letters of administration had first been … Section 190 of Act X of 1865, which has now been superseded by Section 212 of the Indian Succession Act 1926. This section says: 'No right to any part of the property of a person who has died … contention. I may refer to Williams on Executors, Vol. I, pp. 184, 185, in this connection: and in the case of foreclosure suits the general

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, West Bengal Iii Vs. Smt. Champa Kumari Sin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1972SC2119; [1972]83ITR720(SC); (1972)1SCC508; [1972]3SCR118

Act of 1929 speaks of Jains as well as Hindus and Sections. 4 and 57 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 also did the same. The Court pointed out that Section 331 of the Indian Succession Act 1865 did … Law or succession and of contract, has been largely and liberally construed. See the remarks at pages 184, 185, 186, 5 Bom. High C. Reports (Lopes v. Lopes), where Sir Edward Hyde East's evidence in 1830 before