Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 183 · Page 1 of about 151 results (0.061 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 15 1932

Bhagvan Manaji Marwadi Vs. Hiraji Premaji Marwadi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-15-1932

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom516; (1932)34BOMLR1112; 140Ind.Cas.519

lie only incases of fraud and collusion-Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 183-Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 214 (b)-Arbitration-Reference by one partner-Award not binding on other partners.;An application made under Order XXI, Rule 50, of … Chhaganlal cannot recover the amount without the production of a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act; secondly, that the application under Order XXI, Rule 50, Clause (2), is not within time; and thirdly, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2003

Robert D' Mello Vs. Henry D'Mello and Anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-22-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 299; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68 and 71

Reported in : AIR2004Kant78; ILR2003KAR3153; 2003(5)KarLJ232

subject to the process of the Court and capable of giving evidence. Since by Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925 a will has to be attested by two or more witnesses, Section 68 of the Evidence Act would … suspicious circumstance attaching to the execution of the will.'22. CHINNA NARASIMHALU vs KURUBARA BASAPPA AND ANOTHER, 1983(1) KAR.L.J. 183. In this case it is held as under:'A witness to be an attesting witness need not be labelled

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1934

V. Kuppusami Pillai Vs. Jayalakshmi Ammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-15-1934

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 154Ind.Cas.537

is not of the full interest in remainder, that disposition is void under Section 100 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865, (corresponding to Section 113 of the Succession Act of 1925) and that the plaintiff, therefore, cannot maintain … class therein described. As pointed out in Radha Prasad v. Ranimoni 8 Ind. Cas 1061 : 33 C 183 : 15 C.W.N. 113 : 13 Cri. L.J. 185 the legal effect of that declaration is to write

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 06 1977

Smt. Kesar Bai Vs. the Rajasthan Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-06-1977

Subject : Family

Reported in : 1977WLN(UC)164

order dated 23.2.1962, as also its subsequent order dated 29.2.1968, raises the question whether or not the India Succession Act, 1925 (which will hereinafter be referred to as 'the Act) or any corresponding law requiring attestation of wills, was … up to the Board of Revenue, but with no avail.3. Thereafter, she brought the present suit-for possession under Section 183 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, claiming to be entitled to the lands as being the rightful heir

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1994

Gita Alias Gita Ravi Vs. Mary Jenet James Alias M.J. James and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-17-1994

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1995)1MLJ467

of the will had to be proved in accordance with the provisions of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The letters which had been written by Shri Mishra's clerk contained no mention whatsoever of any instructions having … is made to Annoda Prosad Chatterjee 's case I.L.R. Cal. 95. In re. Sureman Singh A.I.R. 1969 Pat. 183, a Bench of that court relied upon the judgment in T. Arumugha Mudaliar's case A.I.R. 1985 Mad. 622

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1921

Ghelabhai Punsi Vs. the East Indian Railway Company

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-19-1921

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom443; (1921)23BOMLR525

the goods were lost.;Curran v. Midland Great Western Company of Ireland (1896) 2 I.R. 183 followed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 1973

J.S. Parkar Vs. V.B. Palekar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-27-1973

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 14, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 43(5), 44A, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 62, 66(2), 68, 69, 69A, 70, 71, 72, 143, 143(2), 143(3), 183, 254, 256(2) and 271(1)

Reported in : [1974]94ITR616(Bom)

loss due to infraction of law - held, assessee not entitled to claim loss as deduction. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … authorities confiscated the goods under section 167-B of the Sea Customs Act. It, howsoever, gave the assessee, under section 183 of the Act, an option to pay the fine in lieu of confiscation and get the goods released.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2007

Pandit Devi Datt (Now Deceased) Through Lrs Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 276; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 15, 15(1) and 16

Reported in : 2007(209)ELT343(Del)

The petition has been filed by the original petitioner Pandit Devi Datt under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for the grant of probate of the last Will and testament of the testatrix Shrimati Ram Kesari wife … heard of him since then till date. Pandit Devi Datt filed a petition for succession certificate bearing No. 183/94 before the Administrative Civil Judge, Delhi and in the said proceedings in terms of the order dated 27.7.1995,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2023

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

any person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act shall be regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Section 21A provides a special provision in certain cases. The provision states that Sections 19, 20 (to the extent … and a suitable accommodation which would enable them to grow in every aspect - mental, physical, and intellectual.186 183 Margaret Trawick, Notes on Love in a Tamil Family (University of California Press 1992) 184 MC Mehta v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2017

Gayatri Aggarwal vs.income Tax Commissioner & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-10-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.40420/2017 (for additional evidence by appellant) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 30.8.2016 whereby the trial court has dismissed the objection of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial