Advanced Search Results

Maddula Kasiyya Vs. Jallipalli Pullayya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 182; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 60; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214

Reported in : AIR1974AP220

to Limitation Act, 1908, Sections 47 and 60 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 214 of Succession Act, 1925 - appeal filed by judgment debtor resisting execution petition which was transferred from one Court to another against … decree transferred and an application for transfer may constitute a step-in-aid of execution within the meaning of Article 182 of the Limitation Act because the purpose of the application is to enable the decree-holder to have the

Bhagvan Manaji Marwadi Vs. Hiraji Premaji Marwadi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom516; (1932)34BOMLR1112; 140Ind.Cas.519

lie only incases of fraud and collusion-Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 183-Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 214 (b)-Arbitration-Reference by one partner-Award not binding on other partners.;An application made under Order XXI, Rule 50, of … Chhaganlal cannot recover the amount without the production of a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act; secondly, that the application under Order XXI, Rule 50, Clause (2), is not within time; and thirdly, the … valid ground, but the application for execution would be governed by Article 182 of the Indian Limitation Act and is, in my opinion, within time.

Mahamaya Dassi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 26, 161, 164, 168 and 256; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 247

Reported in : [1980]126ITR748(Cal)

order to examine this question, it may be relevant to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.18. Section 2 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, provides the definition and Sub-clause (a) of Section 2 defines … Procedure.29. In the case of Executors of the Estate of J. K. Dubash v. CIT [1951] 19 ITR 182, it was held by the Supreme Court that from the day of the death of the testator the

Shri Mahadeo Shankar Shinde Vs. Shri Maruti Shankar Shinde and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 180 to 189

Reported in : AIR2003Bom312; 2003(2)ALLMR559; 2003(4)BomCR645; 2003(2)MhLj446

of place to mention here that Chapter XXII of Part VI (Sections 180 to 189) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 does contemplate the testator bequeathing the property not belonging to him and the effect thereof where the testator … from it at the pain of giving up the benefits conferred on him under the will. Heading to Section 182 of the Indian Succession Act reads: 'Testator's belief as to his ownership immaterial.' These provisions do show that

In Re: Pampappa Ballalrao Desai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR490

of the Indian Penal Code even if the charge turns out to be a false one. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … of Section 211. That being so, the complaint could only be laid under Section 211 and not under Section 182 (see Emperor v. Apaya Tatoba Munde : (1913)15BOMLR574 . But it was not legitimate for the prosecution to

Emperor Vs. Ramkrishna Yeshwant Adarkar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR33

mere want of caution before giving that information. There must be positive and conscious falsehood established. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … local school had misappropriated certain moneys and prompt investigation was requested. The charge against the accused was under Section 182, Indian Penal Code and the accused has been convicted under that section, on the ground apparent' by, that

Babu Lal Grand Sons Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1989)31ITD52(Delhi)

and therefore, in view of Section 14 of the Transfer, of Property Act, 1908 and Section 114 of Succession Act, 1925, the tying-up of property beyond the minority of the persons to whom the Trust created belonged, was against … Works [1978] 112 ITR 445 and in the case of CIT v. Chawla Trunk House [1983] 139 ITR 182. He referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of CIT v. Trustees

Antony D'mello Vs. Joseph Mathew Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1937)39BOMLR620

the order made by the Magistrate discharging the accused was wrong and must be set aside. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … But it is impossible to say at this stage that the Bombay Court has no jurisdiction.5. There is Section 182 of the Code also to be considered. If there is a doubt as to whether the criminal breach

Zamir Ahmed Raz Vs. D.R. Banaji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 84, 85(1), 86-I and 182

Reported in : [1957]27CompCas634(Bom)

not liable as director of Company - held, inclusion of appellant in list of contributories unjustified. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … this learned author is more emphatic and categoric : 'The question, however, is now of little importance, as section 182, post, which applies to all companies, whether formed before or after the 1st January, 1901, prescribes the consequences

R. Ramachandran Vs. G. Hariharan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263 and 317; Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order14, Rule 8 - Order 25, Rule 62; Tamil Nadu Court fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 55 to 59; Evidence Act, 1872; Income-tax Act, 1961; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 50

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ417

of O.S. Rules read with Order 25 Rule 62 of O.S. Rules and Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 14, Rule 8 read with order 25 Rule 62 of O.S. Rules respectively by a common … ORDERA.S. Venkatachalamoorthy, J.1. The learned single Judge dismissed the applications 181 and 182 of 2000 in O.P.284 of 1991 filed by the appellant under Order 14, Rule 8 of O.S. Rules