Advanced Search Results

Prativa Bose Vs. Kumar Rupendra Deb Raikat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 158, 178 and 181; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 48 and 141 - Order XXXVIII; Limitation Act, 1877; Arbitration Act; Bengal Civil Court Act, 1871- Sections 12; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 23; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 192-195; Bengal Wills and Intestacy Regulation, 1799 - 2, 3, IV and V; Mahomedan Law; Bengal Wills and Intestacy Regulation, 1793 - Sections 2 and XIX; Central Provinces Laws Act, 1876; Railway and Canal Traffic Act, 1854 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1965SC540; [1964]4SCR69

have issued it to apply to such a case. Then it was said that ss. 192-195 of the Succession Act, 1925 impliedly repeated s. 4 of the Regulation. These sections of the Succession Act no doubt Act no doubt … in 1948 and now there are two articles, namely, Arts. 158 and 178 which deal with applications under the Arbitration Act and licence, since the … Diwani Adalat in the execution of wills and administration to the estate of persons dying intestate." The first section is in the nature or a preamble, and so far as relevant,sets out the object of the Regulation

Bhavesh Vinodrai Doshi Vs. Smt. Hansaben Vinodrai Doshi and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Will is to be duly proved. They are covered respectively by Section 63 and 59 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The first aspect speaks to the manner and mode of execution. There must be two witnesses and each … did so at the instance of Pravin Mehta, this is put to rest by his answers to questions 178 and 179 (Paperbook, p. 176), where he admits this. The Will itself has a blank for the age

Bandopant Sitaram Bapat by His Heirs Arun Bandopant Bapat and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 82, 83, 84, 85, 88 and 95

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR96; (2002)1BOMLR256; (2002)ILLJ436Bom

limited interest in the immovable properties to Bhagirathibai. Referring to Sections 82, 83, 85 and 88 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the learned counsel for appellants submitted that the meaning of the Will needs to be collected from the … of the testator that he wanted to give limited interest in the immovable properties to Bhagirathibai. Referring to Sections 82, 83, 85 and 88 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the learned counsel for appellants submitted that the … Kevli w/o Popatlal Sakhalchand v. Dalsukhram Sakarchand and Ors. AIR 1945 Bom 178, Tiruchendur Shri Subramaniaswami Temple v. P. Ramaswamia Pillai and Ors. AIR 1950

Kalinath Chatterjee Vs. Nagendra Nath Chatterjee

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Section 276; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 29 - Schedule - Articles 158, 178 and 181

Reported in : AIR1959Cal81,62CWN791

Gupta further contended before us that an application for probate is regulated by a special Act, that is, Succession Act and he drew our attention to Sections 268, 275 and 276 of the said Act, particularly, to Section … noted that the Will in question was executed on the 30th May, 1925. The testator died on the 30th October 1931. The present application for … applications under the Code of Civil Procedure. Schedule 4 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, amended Section 158 and Section 178 of the Indian Limitation Act and made those Articles applicable to certain proceedings under the Arbitration Act. The

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

any person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act shall be regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Section 21A provides a special provision in certain cases. The provision states that Sections 19, 20 (to the extent … the SMA, it is evident that Section 21A links the SMA177Opinion of Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Ghaidan (supra). 178 Principles of interpretation which are well accepted in India must guide this Court’s decision. For example, when two

Surendra Vassant Sirsat of Mapusa, Goa Vs. Legislative Assembly of Sta ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 178, 179, 180, 199(4), 208, 212, 226, 255, 288 and 372(1) ; Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 73; Procedure and Conduct of Business of the Goa Legislative Assembly Rules - Rules 8, 8(5), 10, 20(1), 306, 307, 308, 309 and 310

Reported in : AIR1996Bom10; 1996(2)BomCR362; (1995)97BOMLR621

concluded by voice vote with the consent of the House. The said application is thus rejected. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … of procedure only when the proceedings are conducted after the Speaker is elected by the House under Article 178 of the Constitution of India and not at an anterior stage when the election of the Speaker is

Kessowji Damodar Jairam Vs. Luckmidas Ladha and Khimji Jairam

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1889)ILR13Bom404

the cause of action--Part not material--Practice--Summons to rescind leave given--Limitation Act XV of 1877, Article 178. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Wilson-de-roze Vs. Wilson-de-roze

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1930Cal729

that the petitioner has during the marriage been guilty of adultery.6. Section 178, Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925 (15 & 16 Geo. V. c. 49), which reproduces Section 31, Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857 (20 & 21 … discovered the respondent's whereabouts, and, in May of this year, in the company of Mrs. Spry, she was successful in tracing him to a house in Wellesley 2nd Lane, where she found him in the company of

Chrome Leather Company Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager A. Selvakumar Vs. Q. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

they have established a just cause and also referring to Explanation (b) to Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act,1925 held that the power of attorney adopted certain fraudulent activities. However, the Application filed by the present appellant … in response to a general citation. 14. In Shanti Devi Agarwalla v. Kusum Kumari Sarkar [AIR 1972 Orissa 178], a learned single Judge of the Orissa High Court held that even bare possibility of an interest is

Padmini. Vs. Easwari and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 15, 15(2)(1)(a); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68, 69

the Will (i.e) the defendants to prove the above said Will as per Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. If the primary evidence is not available, then he … mortgaged their properties in item Nos.1 to 3 and 5 in first schedule viz. S.Nos.587/4A, 587-4B, 587/3 and 178/1; Ex.A6 reveals that item No.2 in first schedule viz. S.No.587-4B was purchased by both Elumalai and Gangammal; Ex.A7