Advanced Search Results

V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. Vs. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) Thr. Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

life estate holder. In this context, no doubt, we must clarify one aspect. Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the “Indian Succession Act’, for short) deals with the date of vesting of legacy

Bhikam Singh Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 175; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 18

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1310

documents except as to special requirements prescribed in the case of Will by Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act. If there are any suspicious circumstances about the execution of the Will, it is the duty of a … |Bhikham Singh(Petitioner) 3. On death of Bankey Singh the name of the petitioner came to be recorded under Section 175 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act by the order of Assistant Consolidation Officer dated 27.12.1982. Thereafter, respondent No. 3

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

any person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act shall be regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Section 21A provides a special provision in certain cases. The provision states that Sections 19, 20 (to the extent … with the survivor of a heterosexual relationship for the purposes of succession as a statutory tenant. 174 “ECHR” 175 “Human Rights Act” 176 By a majority of 4-1. 148 PART D202 Section 3 of the Human Rights

Manorama Bai Vs. Rama Bai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104 and 114; ;Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1957Mad269

English Law of Property and which it may be stated is also being embodied in the forthcoming Hindu Succession Act. The established facts in the instant case are: The picnic party was returning in two boats. They capsized … of all occurred at the same moment.' 31a. In India, the English rule Preceding the Law of Property Act, 1925 (Section 184) will govern cases failing under Lawson's Rule 54. The leading decision on that subject is -- 'Agha … in the smrithis and commentaries aa Kutumba (Nardattapradanika 6 or Yaj 11, 175) or avibhakta Kutumba (Yaj II 45) and has been consisting of only

Indranil Chakravarti & Anr vs.the State Nct of Delhi Through of Se ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Page 1 of 4 FAO No.175/2017 1. By this first appeal filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, appellants who were the petitioners in the succession certificate case, seek for setting aside of the impugned judgment

Gopal Krishan & Ors. versus Daulat Ram & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.93

Testator-SR, had not been proved, thereby finding that the Lower Appellate Court had erred in holding otherwise. Headnotes† Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - SR-Testator was the owner of 1/4th share of a land - The Testator had no … on. Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Mandeo Kadam [2002] Supp. 5 SCR 175 : (2003) 2 SCC 91; Kanwaljit Kaur v. Joginder Singh Badwal (deceased … Testator and, therefore, the requirement stipulated u/s. 63 of the Act was not met - The language of Section 63(c) of the Act uses the word ‘OR’ - It states that each Will shall be attested by

Manek Dara Sukhadwalla Vs. Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the remedy of filing an Application for revocation of the probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 15. Learned Counsel then pointed out the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of G. Gopal … would be a clear misreading of the said judgment. The learned Senior Counsel has pointed out paragraphs 174, 175 and 191 of the said judgment, which read as follows: "174. GPB was held to have caveatable interest

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Others Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

AIR 1933 Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun and ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas and ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held that - the position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of … letters of administration in his favour by the Court. (Ramchanran Singh vs. Mst. Dharohar Kuer, AIR 1954 Pat, 175) On the other hand, it is the case of the respondent that in order to ascertain what rights

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and ors. Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

h) AIR 193.Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun & ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas & ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held thatthe position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of a receiver,

Fazal Ali Vs. Amna Khatun and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 2002; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : II(2004)ACC655; 2005ACJ29; AIR2004Raj39; 2005(1)KLT828; RLW2004(3)Raj1454; 2004(1)WLC339

the judgment of the learned single Judge of the High Court filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925? In the said case, the application for probate was rejected by the Original Court. The applicant preferred an … awarded recoverable as arrears of land revenue. The jurisdiction of the Civil Court has been expressly barred by Section 175. It is well settled that a Claims Tribunal gives an award, which does not have the status of