Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 170 · Page 1 of about 141 results (0.052 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 29 2010

Subara Bi @ Tharama Bi Vs. Bhasheeria,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-29-2010

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 163, 163A, 165, 166, 166(1), 168, 169, 170 and 173; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110A and 110C; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 306; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 77; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

injuries sustained were because of accident due to use of motor vehicle for claiming compensation - Held: yes.Succession Act, 1925, Section 306 - Actio personalis moritur cum persona - Abatement - Whether the claim of the injured for the … - Owner of vehicle was ex parte - Insurance company did not seek permission from the Tribunal under Section 170 - Whether insurance company gets right to defend the claim on the grounds beyond Section 149(2) when the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2006

N.R. Patel and Co., Rep. by Its Partner and ors. Vs. Smt. T. Aparna an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A, 110A(1), 149(2), 163A, 165, 166 and 170; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC488; 2006ACJ2719; 2006(4)ALD130; 2006(3)ALT657

not survive and does not pass over to his legal representatives in view of Section 306 of the Succession Act, 1925. However, the claim under the Act also relates to the estate of the deceased, the action survives on … Company did not seek any permission from the Tribunal to contest the claim on all grounds re-coursing to Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act. It is settled law that where the owner remained ex parte, Insurance Company

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2006

H.S. Chetan (Since Deceased by His Lrs. Leelavathi @ Leelamma W/O. K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-12-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149, 149(2), 155, 166, 170 and 173; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110C(2A); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Constitution of India - Article 38

Reported in : 2008ACJ191; 2007(6)KarLJ381; 2007(4)AIRKarR192; AIR2007NOC1642(DB).

reported In : ILR2002KAR1864 . Our attention was drawn to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Central Act No. 39 of 1925), Placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned Counsel assertively canvassed that … of their claim. The insurer was permitted to obtain prior permission to contest the claim as required under Section 170 of the Act. The Tribunal during fresh inquiry, received evidence as offered by the parties and passed award

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 2006

Leelavathi @ Leelamma and anr. Vs. Chandra Mouli and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-12-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 155, 166, 170 and 173; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110C(2A); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Constitution of India - Article 38; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2338; ILR2007(2)Kar2338; 2007(4)KCCRSN217(DB)

and Anr : ILR2002KAR1864 . Our attention was drawn to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Central Act No. 39 of 1925). Placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned Counsel assertively canvassed that … of their claim. The insurer was permitted to obtain prior permission to contest the claim as required under Section 170 of the Act. The Tribunal during fresh inquiry, received evidence as offered by the parties and passed award

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2015

S. Sudaramurthy and Others Vs. Saraswathi Lakshmanan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-21-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

in favour of defendants 1 and 2 is void. Attention is drawn to Section 122 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which reads as follows: 122. Onerous bequests. “ Where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee, he … proceeded to rely upon the decision in Gopinath A vs K. Ramlingam and Others 1989 (1) Kar LJ 170 and B.S. Malleshappa vs. Koratagere B. Shivalingappa and others 2001 (4) Kar LJ 431, to conclude that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2016

R. Janakiraman Vs. S. Uma Rani and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Mar-30-2016

Subject : Education

C.P.C. and Sections 58,68,101 and 104 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 170 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 7. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the following judgments in support of his arguments;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2020

V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. Vs. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) Thr. Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-17-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

life estate holder. In this context, no doubt, we must clarify one aspect. Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the “Indian Succession Act’, for short) deals with the date of vesting of legacy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1993

Dr. M. Ratna Vs. Kottiboyina Navaneetam (Died) and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-1993

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1994AP96; 1993(2)ALT459

radio.27. Therefore, the appeal fails and is dismissed. No costs. Family - will - Section 63 (c) of Succession Act, 1925 ( suit for declaration and possession by second wife claiming suit property under Will - execution of Will … and will be negation of the intention of the Legislature and annihilate mandate of the provisions of Sections 170 and 149 of the Act. The insured can pursue appeal only after giving up the insurer as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1972

Karri Nookaraju Vs. Putra Venkatarao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-1972

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : AIR1974AP13

parties to bear their own costs throughout. No leave.28. Appeal allowed. Commercial - will - Section 63 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - in dispute related to possession and title of land … and will be negation of the intention of the Legislature and annihilate mandate of the provisions of Sections 170 and 149 of the Act. The insured can pursue appeal only after giving up the insurer as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1995

G. Narasimhulu Chetti and Others Vs. S. Pandurangaiah Chetti and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-11-1995

Subject : Property FamilySubject:

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 8; Indian Stamp Act

Reported in : AIR1996AP24; 1995(3)ALT193

dismissed, but in the circumstances without costs.25. Appeal dismissed. Property - rule of prasenti - Section 74 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 8 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - suit for title and possession of property filed … and will be negation of the intention of the Legislature and annihilate mandate of the provisions of Sections 170 and 149 of the Act. The insured can pursue appeal only after giving up the insurer as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial