Advanced Search Results

Sarvjit Singh Sareen Vs. Mrs. Ritu Menon and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 63, 87, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120and 138; Evidence Act 1872 - Sections 68; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Act - Sections 169; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 19 and 21; Hindu Law

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT242

proved by one of the attesting witness, Mr. Navneet Bansal in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. It is urged that the contents of the … of those later decisions, or cite any statutory provision; the court, moreover, was guided by the impact of Section 169 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act. In these circumstances, the court is of opinion that Mauleshwar Mani is

Subara Bi @ Tharama Bi Vs. Bhasheeria,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 163, 163A, 165, 166, 166(1), 168, 169, 170 and 173; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110A and 110C; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 306; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 77; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

injuries sustained were because of accident due to use of motor vehicle for claiming compensation - Held: yes.Succession Act, 1925, Section 306 - Actio personalis moritur cum persona - Abatement - Whether the claim of the injured for the … v. Devilal and Ors., the relevant head notes of which are as follows:Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Section 110-C [Section 169 of 1988 Act] and Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 74 and 77-Claims Tribunal - Procedure and powers - Public

Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 169 and 171; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC498

succession. Section 30 of the Hindu Succession Act. 1956, provides for testamentary succession. Similarly part 6 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 57, refers to testamentary succession by Will. Thus, although Will is not a transfer but Will is a … deed, grant, gift or any form of purchase or contract.'9. The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, Section 169, clearly contemplates that a Bhumidhar with transferable right may by Will bequeath his holdings or any part thereof.

Mrs. Madhu Kohli and anr. Vs. Mr. Suresh Khattar and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 169; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 90

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT117; 2006(87)DRJ343

would include bhumidhari right. It has also been brought to our notice that Section 90 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 should also be adopted in considering the Act. The contention on behalf of the appellants is that though … 18 of the Act, Arjun Singh became bhumidhar of the lands in question. A bhumidhar is enabled under Section 169 of the Act to make a will and bequeath his holding or any part thereof and general order

V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. Vs. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) Thr. Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

life estate holder. In this context, no doubt, we must clarify one aspect. Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the “Indian Succession Act’, for short) deals with the date of vesting of legacy … been taken by survivorship by the other coparceners. The Indian Succession Act did not make 45 AIR1962(Mysore) 72 169 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1021-1026 OF2013 ETC. any inroad into that position. The relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act

G.Aravind Kumar Vs. Md Sadat Ali and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166, 149; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 73

on certain causes of action. According to Section 155, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1926), the death of a person in whose favour a certificate of insurance had been issued, … 'just'. There is no other limitation or restriction on its power for awarding just compensation." "11. Secondly, under Section 169, the Claims Tribunal in holding any inquiry under Section 168 is required to follow the rules that are

Sri S Sundaramurthy Vs. Smt Saraswathi Lakshmanan

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in favour of defendants 1 and 2 is void. Attention is drawn to Section 122 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 , which reads as follows : “122. Onerous bequests. .-Where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee,

S. Sudaramurthy and Others Vs. Saraswathi Lakshmanan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in favour of defendants 1 and 2 is void. Attention is drawn to Section 122 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which reads as follows: 122. Onerous bequests. “ Where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee, he … Industries Limited).) 1. These appeals are heard and disposed of by this common judgment. The appeal in RFA. 169/2009 is filed by defendants 1 and 2. The appeal in RFA.342/2009 is filed by the plaintiff. 2. The

Radhabai Balasaheb Shirke (Since Deceased, Through Her Heirs and L.Rs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8 to 10, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 16; Hindu Womens Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 3(4); ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70 and 72; Hindu Succession (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR823; 2007(5)BomCR324

of Bhikubai and Mahadeo were valid and whether Bhikubai revoked the Will under Section 70 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short,('the Act of 1925').Both the Wills were held to be valid and the contention that Bhikubai revoked

Manilal Sunderji Doshi Vs. Kamal Manilal Doshi and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

and a further conception that the testator had testamantary capacity as required under Section 59 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to execute the will. The Court may, therefore, presume the execution and attestation (See SaratChandra Mondal Vs. Panchanan … 36 ChD 145 CA, Hall Vs. Hall (1868) 1 P and D 481, Baudains Vs. Richardson (1906) AC, 169, Craig Vs. Lamoureux AIR 1919 P. C. 132]. 78. The test case on the subject in India was