Advanced Search Results

Tella Koteswara Rao and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and Special ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 30, 31 and 54; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 90, 152, 163, 214, 214(1) and 214(2); Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act; Claims Act, 1950; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act; Arbitration Act - Sections 14 and 17; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT600

subsequently revoked has not been established. The legacy will not be adeemed under Section 152 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'Succession Act'), since the property was substituted by converting into money component by operation of law … of will and testator's death the legacy is not adeemed by reason of such change in view of Section 163 of Succession Act. Therefore, the claimants 1 to 5 are entitled to receive the compensation. In support of

Subara Bi @ Tharama Bi Vs. Bhasheeria,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 163, 163A, 165, 166, 166(1), 168, 169, 170 and 173; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110A and 110C; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 306; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 77; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

injuries sustained were because of accident due to use of motor vehicle for claiming compensation - Held: yes.Succession Act, 1925, Section 306 - Actio personalis moritur cum persona - Abatement - Whether the claim of the injured for the … evidence that death of injured was due to injuries sustained by him in accident.Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sections 163-A, 165 and 166 - Claim application - Maintainability of - Whether the claimant has to prove with cogent,

Mrs. Lyla Darius Jehangir (Nee Ghaswala) Vs. Bakhtawar LentIn of Mumba ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 75, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86, 87, 88, 95, 104, 119, 187 and 188; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rules 223 and 238

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR171; 2007(1)BomCR915; (2007)109BOMLR107; 2007(1)MhLj545

to be construed by us, we deem it proper to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, particularly Chapter VI of Part VI, which deals with the construction of Wills.Section 74 says that it is … raised therein and accordingly, by this common judgment, we shall dispose of these five Appeals.2. The Appeal Nos. 163 of 2005 and 164 of 2005 are from Originating Summons Nos. 309 of 2000 and 447 of 2003

Pandurang Shamrao Laud Vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : AIR1933Bom342; (1933)35BOMLR700

will-Party to suit-Appointment of administrator.;The position of an administrator pendente. lite, appointed under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, is similar to that of a receiver, with this distinction that the administrator pendente lite represents the estate … real estate. Both these sections are now, with regard to deaths, occurring after the year 1925, repealed by Section 163 (1) of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act of 1925, 15 & 16 Geo. V. c. 49,

Puttamma and ors. Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Thus, compensation/damages proportionate to the loss resulting from such death was payable.13. Under Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 all rights for claiming damages after the death of a person survive and legal representative could claim damages. … paid in favour of the claimants is just and proper, multiplier method is sound method of assessing compensation; Section 163(A) directs to follow a structured formula indicated in Second Schedule to avoid long drawn litigation and delay in

Raja Ram Adult Vs. Lakshmi NaraIn Adult

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2(10) and 3 - Schedule - Article 163; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 268 and 295; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1958All149

Mukerji, J 1. This is a First Appeal From Order under Section 209 of the Indian Succession Act against an order o the learned District Judge of Kanpur refusing to restore an application for the revocation … the date of dismissal, could not be restored. It was contended by Mr. P. N. Shukla that Article 163 of the Limitation Act applied to the case. On behalf of the appellant it was contended that Article

Smt. Shanti Devi Shukla Vs. Tirath Prasad Shukla

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

namely Sukhmanti Bai and Mahendra Kumar Shukla filed an application on 13.7.1994 under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for obtaining succession certificate that the amount of Ramsanehi who was the husband of Sukhmanti Bai deposited in

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Others Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

AIR 1933 Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun and ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas and ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held that - the position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of … so far as the English law and the Indian Law on the subject. Under the English Law viz. Section 163 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act as well as Administration of Estates Act, 1925 specifically mentions the

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and ors. Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

h) AIR 193.Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun & ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas & ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held thatthe position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of a receiver, … so far as the English law and the Indian Law on the subject. Under the English Law viz. Section 163 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act as well as Administration of Estates Act, 1925 specifically mentions the

Vishwanath Naganath Andage Vs. Mahadeo Sultanappa Waghmode and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 9; Provincial Insolvency Act - Sections 4 and 5; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 163

Reported in : AIR1964Bom40; (1963)65BOMLR432; ILR1963Bom59

application by such plaintiff for restoration of the suit and order the suit to be restored. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … as one falling under Rule 9 of Order 9 of the Civil Procedure Code and governed by Article 163 of the Limitation Act. It further held that in the circumstances of the case, it was necessary that