Advanced Search Results

Hussain A. JodhpurwalaVs. Yusuf A. Jodhpurwala and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

affidavits given for granting Letters of Administration in pursuance to the provisions of Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Act 39 of 1925), hereinafter referred to as the said Act ?, could be construed as consent under … and Another vs. Sheth Ambalal Himatlal (since deceased by his LRs) and Others reported in A.I.R. 1999 Gujaraj 162. (ii) Mt. Kulwanta Bewa and Ors. vs. Karam Chand Soni and Ors. reported in A.I.R. 1938 Calcutta 714,

Susila Ammal Vs. Indiraniammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 -- Sections 87, 88, 97, 113, 114 and 118; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 -- Sections 15

Reported in : 2000(4)CTC78

will were incongrous and offended the rule against perpetuity as set out in Section- 114 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.6. Per contra, Mrs.Prabha Sridevan submitted that the concept of rule against perpetuity could not be brought in or … the language of the Will. Bower v. Louis, 1884 (9) AC 890.8. In Subbaryar v. Subbammal, 27 IA 162 : 24 Mad. 214 Lord Macnagten observed that the language of one instrument does not afford much assistance

Doggupati Tirupalamma Vs. K.M. Subbamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 371, 388 and 388(1); Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972 - Sections 16(2)

Reported in : AIR1992AP222

application is erroneous, the same can be corrected in revision. Hence this revision petition was filed.2. Section 371, Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') provides that the District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided, at the … Home appeared and assisted the Court.5. It was held in Bisesar Sheodayal v. Jaiman Bariayam, AIR 1940 Nagpur. 162 that if the inferior Court is invested with the powers of District Judge under S. 388(1) of the

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been … was vacated by the Civil Judge Senior Division then hearing the matter (Ex. L, pp. 155-186, from pp. 162-185).The order is reasoned. It says it was pronounced in open Court. There does not seem to have been

Lakshmi Murali vs M.Rajan

Court : Chennai

is to be proved in terms of the provisions of Section 68 of the Evidence Act and the Succession Act, 1925. The propounder of the Will is called upon to show by satisfactory evidence that the Will was signedby … has relied upon the judgement in Ram Pyare Vs. Ram Narain and Others reported in (1985) 2 SCC 162. 9.The learned counsel further submits that in the present case, the execution of the Will in favour of

D. Tirumalamma Vs. M. Subbamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 371 and 388; Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 16(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT510

is erroneous, the same can be corrected in revision. Hence this revision petition was filed.2. Section 371, Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for Short 'the Act') provides that the District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the … Home appeared and assisted the court.5. It was held in Bisesar Sheodayal v. Jairam Bariyar, AIR 1940 Nag. 162 that if the inferior court is invested with the powers of district judge under Section 388(1) of the

Peoples' Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sardul Singh Caveeshar and Ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 162, 184, 185, 195 and 196; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1961P& H87

at any stage and he can suo motu examine the accounts filed under Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act (1925) so as to pass an order under clause (4) of that section. Reference may also be made to … begun after the winding up order is passed. As they stem from the winding up order passed under Section 162, they cannothave a separate and an independent existence. Theseproceedings became necessary during the progress of winding up and

Puttamma and ors. Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Thus, compensation/damages proportionate to the loss resulting from such death was payable.13. Under Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 all rights for claiming damages after the death of a person survive and legal representative could claim damages. … the claims or, as the case may be, each of the claims and, subject to the provisions of Section 162 may make an award determining the amount of compensation which appears to it to be just and specifying

Chhatrapratap Singh Vs. Tulsi Prasad and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 16, Rules 5 and 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 65, 66, 68, 74(2), 75 and 162; Registration Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT465

under any law to keep public record of a Will. Neither the Registration Act nor does the Indian Succession Act require that Sub-Registrar should keep copy of the original Will with him. This conclusion is supported by the … of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order 16 Rule 15 thereof. It is pointed out that Section 162 of the Evidence Act mandates the requirement of a person, from whose custody a document is sought to

Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 - Section 2; ;Arms Act - Sections 24, 25 and 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307 and 308; ;Punjab Excise Act - Sections 1, 14, 61, 68; ;Evidence Act - Sections 8, 9, 27, 35, 106, 145, 157, 161 and 165; ;Advocates Act, 1961; ;Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 16; ;Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act, 1996; ;Interception of Communications Act, 1985 - Section 6; ;Indian Police Act, 1861 - Section 3; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Section 22; ;Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 2(2) and 18; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 24, 91, 145, 154, 161, 162, 162(1), 161(3), 162, 162(3), 164, 165, 170 to 173, 173(5), 17

Reported in : 2010(3)LC1650(SC)

did not succeed in discharging its onus of removing the suspicious circumstances surrounding Will. Appeal dismissed.-- B. Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 63 & - Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68 -Will -Suspicious Circumstances - Held, In a case where testator's … the appellant-accused that PW-2 Shyan Munshi's statement could not be looked into as the same is hit by Section 162 Cr.P.C. and on the other hand the defence seeks to rely on his testimony. In support of the