Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 149 · Page 1 of about 174 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 24 2016

Chittaranjan Narottamdas Negandhi Vs. Hemkala Alias Meenakshi Mansingh ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

evidence on record, it is necessary to note the provisions of Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: "59. Person capable of making Wills.- Every person of sound mind not being a minor may dispose of … two elements. Before I turn to the evidence on record, it is necessary to note the provisions of Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: "59. Person capable of making Wills.- Every person of … Delhi High Court in K.L. Malhotra v Sudershan Kumari and Anr., (2008) 149 DLT 783. The law does not require every testator to be in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2010

Subara Bi @ Tharama Bi Vs. Bhasheeria,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-29-2010

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 163, 163A, 165, 166, 166(1), 168, 169, 170 and 173; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110A and 110C; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 306; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 77; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

injuries sustained were because of accident due to use of motor vehicle for claiming compensation - Held: yes.Succession Act, 1925, Section 306 - Actio personalis moritur cum persona - Abatement - Whether the claim of the injured for the … negligent and solely responsible for the accident - Tribunal's finding upheld in appeal.Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sections 173, 149(2) and 170 - Motor insurance - Appeal - Defences available to insurance company - Owner of vehicle was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2006

N.R. Patel and Co., Rep. by Its Partner and ors. Vs. Smt. T. Aparna an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A, 110A(1), 149(2), 163A, 165, 166 and 170; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC488; 2006ACJ2719; 2006(4)ALD130; 2006(3)ALT657

not survive and does not pass over to his legal representatives in view of Section 306 of the Succession Act, 1925. However, the claim under the Act also relates to the estate of the deceased, the action survives on … Company does not get an automatic right to defend the claim on the grounds not covered by Section 149(2) of the Act.15. I reiterate that the Insurance Company cannot assail the finding of the question of negligence.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 09 2011

Berrisford (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. Mexfield Housing Co-operative Limited ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

involving the grant of a tenancy for Ms Berrisford's life, and falls now, under the Law of Property Act 1925, section 149(6), to be treated as a tenancy for a term of 90 years determinable on Ms Berrisford's death. … condition ¦ that if the abbot resign, or be deposed, that then it shall be lawful for his successor to enter." 40. In Co Litt vol 1, p 42a, it is similarly stated that if an estate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2006

H.S. Chetan (Since Deceased by His Lrs. Leelavathi @ Leelamma W/O. K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-12-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149, 149(2), 155, 166, 170 and 173; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110C(2A); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Constitution of India - Article 38

Reported in : 2008ACJ191; 2007(6)KarLJ381; 2007(4)AIRKarR192; AIR2007NOC1642(DB).

reported In : ILR2002KAR1864 . Our attention was drawn to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Central Act No. 39 of 1925), Placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned Counsel assertively canvassed that … that the defence available to the Insurance Company is very much limited as circumscribed in the provision of Section 149(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and thus the insurer Is not entitled to maintain an appeal with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2006

Leelavathi @ Leelamma and anr. Vs. Chandra Mouli and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-12-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 155, 166, 170 and 173; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110C(2A); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Constitution of India - Article 38; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2338; ILR2007(2)Kar2338; 2007(4)KCCRSN217(DB)

and Anr : ILR2002KAR1864 . Our attention was drawn to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Central Act No. 39 of 1925). Placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned Counsel assertively canvassed that … that the defence available to the Insurance Company is very much limited as circumscribed in the provisions of Section 149(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and thus the insurer is not entitled to maintain an appeal with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1995

V.M. Mathew Vs. V.S. Sharma and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-1995

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1996SC109; JT1995(6)SC318; 1996(1)KLT36(SC); (1996)1MLJ76(SC); 1995(5)SCALE111; (1995)6SCC122; [1995]Supp3SCR131; 1995(2)LC809(SC)

2 filed L.A.O.P. No. 143 of 1980 in the District Court, Ernakulam under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of letters of administration in respect of the estate of deceased Annamma and annexed the copy … for non-joinder of necessary parties. Consequently, it dismissed the appeal. Respondents thereafter filed another application being L.A.O.P. No. 149 of 1988 for grant of letters of administration which, on caveat being entered,was converted into a suit, namely

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2003

In Re: the Goods of Late Ravinder Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-04-2003

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 225; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 9 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 278

Reported in : AIR2004All46

Sri J. Nagar that the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure save as otherwise provided in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 have been made applicable to the proceedings in relation to the grant of probate and Letters of Administration.10. … question is regarding enlargement/extension of time for payment of court-fee. This is because, there is specific provision, namely Section 149 of the Code of Civil Procedure dealing with power of Court to permit payment of court-fee at any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1955

Jagannath Prasad and ors. Vs. Mst. Ram Dularey and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-17-1955

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 149; Oudh Chief Court Rules - Rule 1 and 1(1); Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 60; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372

Reported in : AIR1956All63

the institution of the suit and the plaintiffs were not entitled to bring a suit without obtaining a succession certificate.5. The plaintiffs in stating their case under Order 10 Rule 2, C. P. C. definitely stated that … section has to be read, as pointed out in the 'Full Bench Case' referred to above, along with Section 149, C. P. C. When an insufficiently stamped memorandum of appeal is presented before a Court the Court has … of the de-posite money & that if any article of the Limitation Act applied to the case, the period of limitation would run from 20-3-1944,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1982

Bhubaneshwar Singh and anr. Vs. Kanthal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-12-1982

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 43A, 397 and 398; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. 1973 - Section 29

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas46(Cal)

of the present case.146. I further hold that the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, viz., Sections 149, 213, 327 and 333, which were sought to be relied upon by Mr. Mridul, have no manner of … shares in favour of Mrs. Daphtary:My attention was drawn in this connection to Section 333 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which is in the following terms : '333(1). The assent of the executor or administrator to a special

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial