Advanced Search Results

Jagdish Chandra Trikha Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyFamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)753; AIR1998Delhi266; 4(1996)CLT513; [2000]100CompCas839(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT874

necessary to obtain letters of administration in terms of the provisions of Sections 211 and 212 of the Succession Act, 1925 and cases which are of relevance and as cited above may now be referred.(19) In Jogendra Chunder Dutt … into existence between persons who take on rent a locker in a safe deposit vault and the bank. Section 148 defines 'bailment' as 'the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract

Aparti Panda Vs. Govinda Sahu

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47

Reported in : AIR1984Ori1

interesting and important question, of law arises for consideration with regard to interpretation of Section 214(1)(b) of the Succession Act, 1925 particularly in view of the fact that the High Courts in India are evenly divided and there is … the legal representatives can therefore continue the proceedings without filing a separate execution petition, by substituting themselves under Section 148 and Order 21, Rule 16, Civil P. C............'In the case of C. S. Loganathan v. P. L, Kapur,

Lydia Agnes Rodriques Nee D'Cunha and Others Vs. Joseph Anthony D'Cunh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

their siblings Mrs Annie D'souza, Mr Joseph D'Cunha and Mr Edwin D'Cunha as his heirs under the Indian Succession Act 1925 by which he was governed. Mrs Annie D'Souza expired on 5th July 1993 and is survived by petitioner … fraud committed by the respondents and/or their predecessor and is thus within time. Learned counsel submits that under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, grant of probate can be revoked if the just cause described therein … Suit was governed by the Limitation Act of 1948. Arts, 134 and 148 reads as follows:Description of suitPeriod of limitationTime from which period begins to

In Re: the Goods of Late Ravinder Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 225; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 9 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 278

Reported in : AIR2004All46

Sri J. Nagar that the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure save as otherwise provided in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 have been made applicable to the proceedings in relation to the grant of probate and Letters of Administration.10. … the Court has power to enlarge the period for payment of Court-fee in view of the provisions of Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is further submitted by Sri J. Nagar that the provisions of

S. Palani and Others Vs. S. Bharathi Dasan (Deceased) and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2007 numbered on conversion of O.P.No.607 of 2007, filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, praying that Letters of Administration … (Prayers: T.O.S.No.22 of 2007 numbered on conversion of O.P.No.607 of 2007, filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Madras High … Vs. C.J.Ayodhya Ram Singh (2006 (13) SCC 449 : 2006 (11) SCALE 148), wherein this Court has held that the court must satisfy its conscience

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157-189 and 190.Restrictions and … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Electro Graphites Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1990 - Sections 28; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(1) and 143(1A)

Reported in : (2000)160CTR(SC)8; [2000]243ITR48(SC)

cash compensatory support was not warranted - question answered in affirmative and in favour of assessee. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & V.S.Sirpurkar,JJ] Proof of Will - Mere examination of attesting witnesses to prove due execution … subsequently that the assessee had failed to disclose its profits from sale of certain lands, issued notices under Section 148 for both the years. The assessee, however, disclosed the same income as in the original returns. The Income-tax

Vera D. Thackersey Vs. Bai Manekbai Annasaheb Thackersey

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 264(1), 265, 265(1), 266, 267, 268, 272, 283, 286, 288 and 299; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28-A and 28-A(1); Bombay High Court Orders; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 55 and 255; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Probate and Administration Act, 1881; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Madras Civil Courts Act - Sections 29(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Bombay City Municipalities Act, 1925; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1977Bom419; (1976)78BOMLR543

which was vested in the High Court. 5. Our attention was invited to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Courts Act. 1869 and R. 255 of the High Court Rules, Civil Manual … Bench of the Bombay High Court in the case of Spring Mills, Ltd. v. Ambekar 51 Bom LR 148: AIR 1949 Bom 188 and also to an earlier decision of a Division Bench of Ihe Bombay High

M.K. Srinivasan and Kannan Vs. Rangarajan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264, 265, 266, 270, 273, 278, 286, 295, 299, 384(1), 388, 388(1) and 388(2); Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Sections 87; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 23; Punjab Civil Courts Act, 1918 - Sections 30; Central Provinces Courts Act, 1917 - Sections 19; Bombay Civil courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A; Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 29(1); Madras City Civil Courts Act, 1892; Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 12, 13, 29, 29(1), 29(2) and 29(3); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 4(2); Tamil Nadu Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2004; Bombay Civil Courts [Extension and Amendment] Act, 1958 - Sections 8; Succession Certificate Act - Sections 26; Chenna

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ435

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar v. Rengammal, wherein at pages 321 to 323, it is observed as follows:.The Indian Succession Act, 1925, is a consolidating stature which repealed and re-enacted several statutes which dealt with succession to and protection of … of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukkazhukundram, which has no jurisdiction to try the testamentary succession, as per Section 2[bb] of the Indian Succession Act and prayed for passing necessary orders to call for the original petition … Court exercising testamentary and intestate jurisdiction. In Huran v. Higan 34 All 148 [149], it is held that an appeal from an order of a

indurai Bhaurai Desai Vs. Shivlal Nabhubhal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : AIR1925Bom339; (1925)27BOMLR467

Matched in: Citation AIR1925Bom339; (1925)27BOMLR467