Advanced Search Results
K.M. Varghese and ors. Vs. K.M. Oommen and ors.
Kerala
Jul-20-1993
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 276 and 278; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Law
AIR1994Ker85
the validity of the cancellation deed Ext. A2. Family - probate - Sections 63, 276 and 278 of Succession Act, 1925, Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Indian Law - … properties scheduled in application after imposing necessary fees for issuing letters of administration. - MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 147 (1)(b)(i) [As amended in 1994]; [V.K. Bali, CJ, M.Ramachandran & S. Sirijagan, JJ] Third Party Risk Gratuitous passengers
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSriman Prabahan Mitra Vs. Sm. Madhuri Mitra and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-02-1985
ContractProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Section 147; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 6; ;Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; ;Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act - Section 8; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 16
AIR1985Cal368
bequest mentioned in the Will is not enforceable at all being hit by Section 147 of the Indian Succession Act. It has been further submitted in this connection by Mr. Mitra that life estate holders have been given
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAysha Beevi Mariya Ummal Kunju and ors. Vs. Abdul Karim Rahuma Beevi a ...
Kerala
Jul-06-1971
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rule 4
AIR1972Ker64
they shall not be asked to produce a succession certificate as required by Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as the debt defined in that Section does not include a decree for the enforcement of the mortgagee's … of that section. In Narayana Pillai v. Eravi Naravana Panicker, 1956 Ker LT 852 = (AIR 1957 Trav-Co 147) there is an observation that with regard to the execution against the property charged on the immovable property
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Joyna John Vs. State and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2010
Property
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299/384, 276/279, 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 68
1. The present appeal under section 299/384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is directed against the order dated 02.07.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge, whereby the learned Judge has … Sudershan Kumari & Anr., 149(2008) DLT 783; and,5.Vir Bhan Chaudhary & Ors. v. State of Delhi through Collector, 147(2008) DLT 321.8. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have also gone through the record
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.
Delhi
Feb-08-2007
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2
AIR2007Delhi242
Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157-189 and 190.Restrictions … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. P.C. Chacko and Others
Kerala
Jul-22-2011
Land Acquisition
In this view of the matter following the principles under Chapter II of Part V of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, claimant is the only legal heir of his deceased daughter and grandchild. No dispute is raised on that … where the authorised insurer has no principal liability and such insurer becomes liable only by the play of Section 147 and Section 149 of the Act. Similarly Section 163A which declares the right and liability does not in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Kumar Verma and Ors. Vs.radha Krishan Verma and Ors.
Delhi
Oct-10-2019
Land Acquisition
is placed on Section 19 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to argue that the Defendants have a vested right in the suit property and Section 147 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Lal Grand Sons Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Aug-17-1989
Direct Taxation
(1989)31ITD52(Delhi)
and therefore, in view of Section 14 of the Transfer, of Property Act, 1908 and Section 114 of Succession Act, 1925, the tying-up of property beyond the minority of the persons to whom the Trust created belonged, was against … 15-5-1982 by different Income-tax Officers but that neither to the assessee's knowledge any action had been initiated under Section 147 nor under Section 263 and that, therefore, in this background the initiation of proceedings under Section 263 for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. M. Ratna Vs. Kottiboyina Navaneetam (Died) and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-23-1993
Family
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Registration Act, 1908
AIR1994AP96; 1993(2)ALT459
radio.27. Therefore, the appeal fails and is dismissed. No costs. Family - will - Section 63 (c) of Succession Act, 1925 ( suit for declaration and possession by second wife claiming suit property under Will - execution of Will … two Forum. The only defence which the insurer could take is limit of its liability as enumerated under Section 147 of the Act, leading to contest, inter alia, only between insured and insurer and does not impact claimants
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarri Nookaraju Vs. Putra Venkatarao and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-20-1972
Commercial
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68
AIR1974AP13
parties to bear their own costs throughout. No leave.28. Appeal allowed. Commercial - will - Section 63 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - in dispute related to possession and title of land … two Forum. The only defence which the insurer could take is limit of its liability as enumerated under Section 147 of the Act, leading to contest, inter alia, only between insured and insurer and does not impact claimants
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »