Advanced Search Results

Master Nitish Arora Vs. State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 296 and 273; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 145 - Order 5, Rule 12, 20 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT21; 2007(94)DRJ407

of his minor son Master Nitish Arora, filed the present probate petition under Section 273 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 on the 18th August, 1998. By this petition probate of an alleged will dated 27th May, 1998 purportedly … No. 2 at Rani Bagh was not so given as this property was in dispute and proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Civil Procedure were pending. According to Mr. Dhull, learned Counsel for the petitioner, this

L. Bakthavatsalam and ors. Vs. R. Alagiriswamy (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30 and 63; Central Act, 1986; Indian Succession Act, 1956; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63, 65, 68, 69, 71 and 80; Specific Relief Act - Sections 34; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 58 and 60; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3, 14, 15 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145; Central Act, 1986; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : 2007(5)CTC513; (2007)6MLJ128

has not been taken note of by the learned First Appellate Judge. 45. Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 speaks about the execution of unprivileged Wills, which reads as under:63. Execution of unprivileged Wills. - Every testator, … that was resisted by the wife of R.V. Rangasamy Naidu, namely, Krishnammal, who has preferred a complaint under Section 145 Cr.P.C. It was the case of the said R.V. Lakshmiah Naidu and his sons that they along with

Rupali Mehta Vs. Smt. Tina Narinder SaIn Mehta

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 192, 193, 194, 195, 208, 209, 217, 247, 268, 269 and 269(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 141 - Order 21 Rule 63 - Order 39

Reported in : AIR2007Bom62; 2006(6)ALLMR48; 2006(6)BomCR778; 2006(6)MhLj786

Birla v. Laxmi Devi Newar and Anr. : 2005(4)CHN544 . 5. Perusal of the preamble of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 shows that the Act has been enacted to consolidate the law applicable to intestate and testamentary succession. The … case of a dispute as to succession. This Part in some respect stands in a similar position to Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code') with respect to certain specified properties, where

Badri Lal S/O Bhanwar Lal Vs. Smt. Suraj Kanwar (Deceased) Represented ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN682

Bhandari, the learned counsel for the respondent, has submitted that the requirement of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, have not been fulfilled in this case. Shri Bhandari has further submitted that Sheokaran (DW 2) who has … : AIR1955SC346 Umrao v. Buxi Gopal AIR 1957 Raj. 180 V.S. Rao v. T. Kamakashiama AIR 1978 Ori 1459. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the whole matter and have also gone through the record of

Zee Telefilms Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 7, 12, 13(1), 13(2), 14, 17, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 21, 21A, 26, 32, 73, 77, 145(3), 226 and 298; Human Rights Act, 1998 - Sections 8; Companies Act; Succession Act 1925 - Sections 118; International Airport Authority Act, 1971; International Cricket Council Rules - Rules 8, 9, 10, 12, 32, 32A, 33, 34, 35 and 38; Societies Registration Act 1860; Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975; Trade Practices Act, 1974; Wheat Marketing Act, 1989

Reported in : AIR2005SC2677; (2005)4CompLJ283(SC); JT2005(2)SC8; (2005)4SCC649; [2005] 1 SCR 913; MANU/SC/0074/2005

in U.K. in relation to a provision which was in pari materia with Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act 1925, this Court observed:'...The constitutionality of a provision, it is trite, will have to be judged keeping in view … which will have to be heard by a Bench not less than 5 Judges as contemplated under Article 145(3) of the Constitution. Place this matter before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for further orders.Since the matter involved requires

Thakur Madhosingh Vs. Jagdambalal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 283

Reported in : AIR1960Raj237

Had or had not a valid title to the house,, there were good chances of the defendants becoming successful in proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P. C. on the basis of long as well as immediate possession. … on 15th September, 1952. Jagdambalal and Mangilal also took steps to protect their possession by instituting proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P. C. on 27th December, 1952 against certain persons who were partisans of the aforesaid Thakurs.2. Some … as it did not come-within the provisions of Section 25 of the Act. The contention was then raised that the plaintiff gave up. certain rights

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157-189 … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. Vs. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) Thr. Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

life estate holder. In this context, no doubt, we must clarify one aspect. Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the “Indian Succession Act’, for short) deals with the date of vesting of legacy … STAGE3 This litigation has a chequered history. It all began way back in the year 1955. Proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (for short “CrPC”) came to be initiated before the First Class

Gajalakshmi Vs. N. Nagaraja Reddy and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is entered and the application is registered as a suit (in conformity with Section 295 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925) one-half the scale of fee as prescribed in Article 1 Schedule I, on the market value of the … AT v. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER, AIR 1963 SC 591; STATE OF MADRAS t. NAKOALAL, Air 1967 SC 1458; and STATE OF KERALA v. RUTTY,AIR 1969 SC 378). In fact, as stated earlier, the, levy of higher

Nagulapati Lakshmamma Vs. Mupparaju Subbaiah

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Transfer Property Act - Sections 3; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 20; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; General Clauses Act, 1897

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)557; AIR1998SC2904; 1998(3)ALLMR(SC)652; 1998(2)CTC408; JT1998(3)SC253; (1998)IIIMLJ129(SC); 1998(2)MPLJ453; (1998)119PLR528; 1998(2)SCALE705; (1998)5SCC285; [

closely related, we direct them to bear their respective costs. Family - will - Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 - appeal against Order of High Court holding that 'will' was not proved as required by law - … with the mercantile system of accounting the Income Tax Officer was bound to give effect to it under section 145 of the Act and, therefore, the treatment of the three sums representing interest on sticky loans as the