Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 140 · Page 1 of about 166 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 06 2006

Prof and Dr. D. Venkayya Chowdary Vs. Paruchisti R. Katrak

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2006

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 213, 276, 278 and 301; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD173; 2006(2)ALT456

the said civil miscellaneous appeals.5. O.P. No. 134 of 1996 was filed under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for brevity 'the Act'), O.P No. 140 of 1996 was filed under Sections 213 and 276 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2007

Master Nitish Arora Vs. State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2007

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 296 and 273; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 145 - Order 5, Rule 12, 20 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT21; 2007(94)DRJ407

of his minor son Master Nitish Arora, filed the present probate petition under Section 273 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 on the 18th August, 1998. By this petition probate of an alleged will dated 27th May, 1998 purportedly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2007

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 08 2011

Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. Vs. Jindal Exports Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-08-2011

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : The Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Sections 50, 45, 39; The Delhi High Court Act - Section 10; The Specific Relief Act - Section 6; The Trade Marks Act - Sections 76, 77; Government of India Act - Section 108; The Land Acquisition Act - Section 54; The Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 39, 43; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Sections 104, 588, 4; The Indian Succession Act - Section 299

of a single judge of a High Court on an appeal filed under section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Arguing against the maintainability of a letters patent appeal against the judgment of the single judge it was … Specific Relief Act, Chandra Kanta Sinha v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., (2001) 6 SCC 158, under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sharda Devi (supra), under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2013

Puttamma and ors. Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Thus, compensation/damages proportionate to the loss resulting from such death was payable.13. Under Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 all rights for claiming damages after the death of a person survive and legal representative could claim damages. … of them, as the case may be: Provided that where such application makes a claim for compensation under Section 140 in respect of the death or permanent disablement of any person, such claim and any other claim (whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2008

Avtar NaraIn Behal Vs. Subhash Chander Behal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-20-2008

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 4; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 4, 5(2), 10, 10(1) and 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 10; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39 and 39(1); Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 76; Government of India Act, 1915; Guardians and Wards Act - Sections 25, 47 and 48; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 140; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10-E, 10-F, 397, 398 and 483; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 4, 4(1), 35A, 47, 91, 92, 95, 96, 100A, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 115 and 622 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT140

appellant aggrieved by the same preferred an appeal being FAO No. 420/2003 under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which was also dismissed by the learned single Judge on 31.03.2008 and the present Letters Patent Appeal has … a Letters Patent Appeal was maintainable against a judgment/order of a single Judge in an order passed under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act was considered by the Supreme Court in the case of Chandra Kanta Sinha

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1975

Amitava Roy and ors. Vs. Sm. Jyotsna Prova Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-30-1975

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 30, 102, 103 and 140

Reported in : AIR1975Cal323

In the circumstances,we hold that Kumar Sarat Kumar Roy was the residuary legatee.6. Section 103 of the Indian Succession Act provides that under a residuary bequest, the legatee is entitled to all property belonging to the testator at … question should not fall into theresidue.7. It is contended on behalf of the respondents that by virtue of Section 140 of the Act, the funds mentioned in paragraph 22 of the will remained a part of the estate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2016

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-2016

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been … on record a copy of an email of 30th December 2007 from Deolankar to Abha (Ex. J, p. 140).In this, he says that the Probate was obtained because Rajan and Ravi (i.e., Rajendra and Dr Ravindra Lohokare)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2016

Dr. Gangaraju Sowmini and Another Vs. Alavala Sudhakar Reddy and Anoth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-01-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 read with the provision under Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, has held that if the death is due to the injuries suffered in the accident, legal representatives can … answering this reference. Chapter X of the said Act deals with the cases of liability without fault and Section 140 of the Act imposes liability on the owners of vehicles to pay compensation in certain cases on principle

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1955

Ramanlal Maganlal Vs. Binani Commercial Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-22-1955

Subject : Contract

Acts : Supply and Prices of Goods Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 7, 10 and 14; Constitution of India - Article 249; Sale of Goods Act

Reported in : AIR1958Bom15; (1957)59BOMLR1131; ILR1955Bom1089

quantity or by indicating a mode of computation by which the maximum could be arrived at. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … under this contract and no dispute survives with regard to tin's quantity. With regard to the balance of 140 tons defendant failed to take delivery, and the plaintiffs sold the same and there was a shortfall. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial