Advanced Search Results
Kuberdas Devchand Soni Vs. Jerkish Naoroji
Mumbai
Jul-18-1941
Property
(1941)43BOMLR981
did act as administratrix of the estate, then by reason of Sections 211 and 307 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the estate would be bound by the mortgage. It is true that she was in fact an administratrix … a true construction of the deed she did act as administratrix of the estate, then by reason of Sections 211 and 307 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the estate would be bound by the mortgage. It … are discussed, Bank of Bombay v. Suleman Somji (1907) L.R. 35 IndAp 139 and 'Williams on Executors', 1931 edn. 2. p. 1171.4. The next contention
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. Mathew (Died) and ors. Vs. Leela Joseph
Chennai
Jul-23-2007
PropertyCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ;Registration Act - Sections 58, 59 and 60
2007(5)CTC318; (2007)5MLJ740
capable of giving evidence. In addition, it has to satisfy the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. In order to assess as to whether the Will has been validly executed and is a genuine document,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Josephine Jerome W/O. Late S. Eric Jerome, Vs. S. Santiago and S. ...
Chennai
Jul-23-2007
PropertyCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68 and 114; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63
2007(4)CTC672
capable of giving evidence. In addition, it has to satisfy the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. In order to assess as to whether the Will has been validly executed and is a genuine document,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.
Delhi
Feb-08-2007
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2
AIR2007Delhi242
Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanshamdoss Narayandoss Vs. Gulab Bi Bai
Chennai
Sep-12-1927
PropertyFamily
AIR1927Mad1054; (1927)53MLJ709
person's rights as legatee, he comes within the scope of Section 213 of the Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 (Section 187 of the old Act X of 1865) under which 'No right as legatee can he established in … the will annexed have been granted?2. This question deals with the provisions of Section 187 of the Indian Succession Act, X of 1865, which is to the effect that no right as legatee can be proved by a … in Odgers' book on Principles of Pleading and Practice, Chapter VIII, p. 139, Ninth Edition : 'If the plaintiff is in possession of any land
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhas Chandra Bose Vs. Gordhandas I. Patel
Mumbai
Sep-28-1939
PropertyTrusts and Societies
AIR1940Bom76; (1940)42BOMLR89
for the Courts to enforce, and that therefore the gift ofailed.;Per Beaumont C.J. Section 138 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, has nothing to do with the creation of a trust. The condition precedent to the coming into operation … by the word ' direct.'8. Mr. Sarat Bose has further argued that the case can be brought within Section 139 of the Indian Succession Act which seems to me to be directed to the rule, well known in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopichand Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Kolkata
Jul-16-1980
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Section 18(1); ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263 and 273
85CWN431,[1981]132ITR308(Cal)
facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal, in view of Section 273 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, was justified in law in holding that the said will executed by late Satyanarayan Agarwalla proved and registered … receipt of the income-tax file of the deceased, Satyanarayan Agarwalla, at Calcutta, the ITO issued notices under Section 139(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961, for the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1962-63, which was served
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay Vs. Vasantlal Fulchand ...
Mumbai
Feb-18-1938
Property
AIR1938Bom360; (1938)40BOMLR497
of action against the other debtors. Isaacs & Sons v. Salbstein (1916) 2 K.B. 139 followed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Lal Grand Sons Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Aug-17-1989
Direct Taxation
(1989)31ITD52(Delhi)
and therefore, in view of Section 14 of the Transfer, of Property Act, 1908 and Section 114 of Succession Act, 1925, the tying-up of property beyond the minority of the persons to whom the Trust created belonged, was against … R.K. Metal Works [1978] 112 ITR 445 and in the case of CIT v. Chawla Trunk House [1983] 139 ITR 182. He referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of CIT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShobha Madhusudan Sheth Vs. Sandeep Shyam Bhanushali
Mumbai
Nov-19-2012
Right to Information
death certificate of the other attesting witness has been tendered in Court today and is taken on record. Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 276 â Comparative Citation: 2013 (2) MAH.L.J 139 … stated to be the attesting witness had not attested the signature of the deceased. Under the provisions of Section 63 of Indian Succession Act the Will has to be signed by the Testator before it is signed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »