Advanced Search Results

Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Parshottam Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT192; 1993(25)DRJ338; 1992RLR126

foregoing discussion. (29) There is support for interpreting the will in this manner also from the provisions of section 138 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which provides as under: '138.Direction that fund be employed in particular manner … a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of section 276/ 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') was filed by respondent No.1 on the basis of a will, dated 9th September,

B. Anjanaiah Vs. Nagappa

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 381, 383, 384 and 387; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 8 and 78

Reported in : AIR1967AP61

in this revision petition.(10) Revision dismissed. Property - succession certificate - Sections 381, 383, 384 and 387 of Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 8 and 78 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - defendant executed promissory note in favour of … earlier, the plaintiff has filed the suit on the basis of a succession certificate issued to him. Under Section 381 of the Indian Succession Act, such certificate would be conclusive as against the persons owing such debts

Sree Rama Varaprasada Rice Mill and anr. Vs. Takurdas Topandas and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(12A), 9, 9(1), 27, 36 and 61; Government of India (Adaptation of India Laws) Order, 1937; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 311; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 69 and 70; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 311

Reported in : AIR1960AP155

(12-A) of Stamp Act, 1899, Sections 69 and 70 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Section 311 of Succession Act, 1925 - suit filed on basis of certain 'hundies' - alleged that 'hundies' were promissory notes and were insufficiently

Sarvjit Singh Sareen Vs. Mrs. Ritu Menon and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 63, 87, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120and 138; Evidence Act 1872 - Sections 68; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Act - Sections 169; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 19 and 21; Hindu Law

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT242

proved by one of the attesting witness, Mr. Navneet Bansal in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. It is urged that the contents of the … VIII as carving out a new exception to the provisions of Chapter VII.47. The plaintiff lastly, submits that Section 138 provides that where a fund is bequeathed absolutely to or for the benefit of any person, but the

PravIn Kumar Kothari, Deceased Dipti Bavishi Vs. Ashoke Kothari

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263; ;Negotiable Instrument Act - Section 138; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Rules 9, 10 and 26

Reported in : AIR2006Cal164,2006(3)CHN166

other existence of codicil. He has shown me the provision of Section 263 together with illustration of the Succession Act, 1925, and contends that just cause for revocation of grant exists as no special citation was served and issued. … Anr. reported in , it is held in paragraph 23 while dealing with the service of notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act where the notice is returned as unclaimed not as refused was presumed to have

K.K. Thankappan and ors., Etc. Vs. K.S. Jayan and ors. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 20, Rule 13; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 229 and 231; Travancore Ezhava Act, 1100 M.E. - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50, 67 and 74(2); Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 87

Reported in : AIR2003Ker114

Section 9 and Order 20 Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 229 and 231 of Succession Act, 1925, Section 2 of Travancore Ezhava Act, 1100 M.E., and Sections 50, 67 and 74 (2) of Evidence Act, 1872

Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Parshottam Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT263

thereafter a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') was filed by respondent No. I on the basis of a will, dated 9th … of money. But this limited view which the learned Counsel for the appellant sought to canvass for interpreting Section 138 is not tenable for the reason that the heading of the chapter in which this Section occurs indicates

Smt. Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Dr. Parshottam Lal and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 87, 82, 114, 138, 276 and 278; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 63 and 68; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi134

thereafter a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act) was filed by respondent No. I on the basis of a Will, dated 9th … of money. But this limited view which the learned counsel for the appellant sought to canvass for interpreting Section 138 is not tenable for the reason the heading of the chapter in which this section occurs indicates that

Suresh Chand Mathur Vs. Harish Chand Mathur

Court : Delhi

Subject : Indian Succession

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Section 138

transfer of the share in the suit property is void and invalid under Section 138 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925? If so, whether the plaintiffs have absolute right to sell their respective portions? OPP(vi) Relief.6. Issue No.1 No

Rathindra Nath Mitra Vs. Smt. Angurbala Mullick and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta City Civil Court Act, 1953 - Section 5; ;Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules - Rule 29

Reported in : AIR1976Cal217,80CWN471

under- (i) the Guardians and Wards Act 1890 (VIII of 1890), and (ii) Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (XXXIX of 1925), in respect of succession certificates. (4) The City Civil Court shall not have jurisdiction to … negotiable instrument under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, other than a promissory note and as such excluded under Section 2(12)(e) of the Bengal Money Lenders Act from the operation of the said Act. Counsel submitted that in