Advanced Search Results

Jamunabai Bhalchandra Bhoir and ors. Vs. Moreshwar Mukund Bhoir

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 14(2); Hindu Women's Right to Properties Act, 1937 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 135; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 157; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR278

or other rule of succession descends to a single heir or to any property to which the Indian Succession Act, 1925, applies.Thus under Section 3(1), if Hindu dies intestate leaving separate property that separate property shall, devolve upon his … Bhaskar Nilkanth v. Narayan Dhonddev Tattoo and Ors.) A.I.R. 1915 Bom 63, wherein it was held that under Section 135(j) of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 enacts that the entries in the record of rights shall be

Michael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … and another vs. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb and another, 1994 (5) SCC 135 in case of Bhagwan Kaur w/o. Bachan Singh vs. Kartar Kaur w/o.Bachan

Michael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … and another vs. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb and another, 1994 (5) SCC 135 in case of Bhagwan Kaur w/o. Bachan Singh vs. Kartar Kaur w/o.Bachan

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Others Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

AIR 1933 Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun and ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas and ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held that - the position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of … Maheshwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. and ors. vs. Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills and ors. (AIR 1965 All 135); In support of the contention that APL by transmission by operation of law - Companies Act, 1956 Section

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and ors. Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

h) AIR 193.Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun & ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas & ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held thatthe position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of a receiver, … b) Maheshwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. & ors. vs. Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills & ors. (AIR 196.All 135); In support of the contention that APL by transmission by operation of law - Companies Act, 1956 Section

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

Bhagvan Manaji Marwadi Vs. Hiraji Premaji Marwadi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom516; (1932)34BOMLR1112; 140Ind.Cas.519

lie only incases of fraud and collusion-Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 183-Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 214 (b)-Arbitration-Reference by one partner-Award not binding on other partners.;An application made under Order XXI, Rule 50, of … 29 Bom. L.R. 660 Ram Bharose v. Kallu Mal I.L.R. (1899) All. 135 and Gopal Das v. Baij Nath I.L.R. (1925) All. 239 In Lindley … Chhaganlal cannot recover the amount without the production of a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act; secondly, that the application under Order XXI, Rule 50, Clause (2), is not within time; and thirdly, the

Aysha Beevi Mariya Ummal Kunju and ors. Vs. Abdul Karim Rahuma Beevi a ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1972Ker64

they shall not be asked to produce a succession certificate as required by Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as the debt defined in that Section does not include a decree for the enforcement of the mortgagee's … along with his execution application. Lastly, it is held in A. Ramaswami v. Venkamma. AIR 1963 Andh Pra 135 that a debt contemplated by Section 214 would not include a debt for enforcement of the mortgagee's rights

Kali Sadhan Banerjee and ors. Vs. K.K. Banerji and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 11, 28 and 32; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 131, 135 and 138

Reported in : AIR1982Cal158,86CWN583

not completely destroy the heritability of the estate but merely modifies it or interferes with the course of succession cannot therefore operate as a defeasance clause.'In the case of Bhoobun Mohini Debia v. Hurrish Chunder Chowdhury (1878) … It has been found by the courts below that the deed of settlement was properly executed and was acted upon. These findings of fact are not challenged in second appeal. It is in evidence that Brojendra Bala … being derogatory to the grant is void for repugnacy. In my view, Section 31 of the T. P. Act cannot apply to this case. I

Tirthabasi Ghose and ors. Vs. Bhuyani Trinayani Dasi

Court : Orissa

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1951Ori306

Bom. 386 : (2 Bom. L. R. 191); Kewalmal v. Isri Bai, 93 I. C. 353: (A.I.R. (13) 1925 Sind 135), Sheo Mangal. Bodhikuar, A. I. R. (23) 1936 Oudh 60 : (11 Luck 607) and Sundari … Act (referring to the Hindu Women's Eights to Property Act, 1987) conferred upon the widow a right of Succession in respect of all her husband's property, the right of maintenance allowed to her under the ordinary Hindu … academic interest to discuss the various conflicting decisions regarding the effect of Sections 52 and 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, when a property