Advanced Search Results

Prof and Dr. D. Venkayya Chowdary Vs. Paruchisti R. Katrak

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 213, 276, 278 and 301; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD173; 2006(2)ALT456

the said civil miscellaneous appeals.5. O.P. No. 134 of 1996 was filed under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for brevity 'the Act'), O.P No. 140 of 1996 was filed under Sections 213 and 276 of the

Lydia Agnes Rodriques Nee D'Cunha and Others Vs. Joseph Anthony D'Cunh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

their siblings Mrs Annie D'souza, Mr Joseph D'Cunha and Mr Edwin D'Cunha as his heirs under the Indian Succession Act 1925 by which he was governed. Mrs Annie D'Souza expired on 5th July 1993 and is survived by petitioner … fraud committed by the respondents and/or their predecessor and is thus within time. Learned counsel submits that under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, grant of probate can be revoked if the just cause described therein … “20. This Suit was governed by the Limitation Act of 1948. Arts, 134 and 148 reads as follows:Description of suitPeriod of limitationTime from which period

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

Radheshyam Basak Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 265, 372 and 388(1); ;Calcutta (West Bengal) Civil Rules, 1935 - Rule 317(1); ;Calcutta (West Bengal) Civil Order, 1935; ;Calcutta High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rules 7 and 9; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1977Cal17

of 24-Parganas have been invested with the functions of the District Judge under Section 388(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 within the local limits of Sadar Munsif of Alipore under the Government of West Bengal Judicial Department Notification … jurisdiction to entertain the case.7. Mr. Chakraborty next refers to a decision reported in (1885) 13 Ind App 134 (PC), (Ledgard v. Bull). In this case a suit was instituted in the Court of the Subordinate Judge,

In Re: Estate of Sambhunath Roy and Vs. Gostho Behary Sil and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 124, 125, 131 and 134; ;Transfer of Property Act - Section 24

Reported in : AIR1951Cal426

563 P. C.). That was a case of death simpliciter as in illustration (b) of Section 124, Indian Succession Act (formerly Section 111). That section and the illustration read as follows :'Where a legacy is given if a … two daughters, defts. Satya Dassi & Jasoda Dassi, his heirs. Nundolal Roy, the executor, died in or about 1925, leaving his sons, defts. Bankim Chandra, Kala Chand, Tara Chand, Shyam Chand, Ratan Chand & Nemai Chand, his

Central Bank of India Vs. Indian Light Gauge Metal Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 13, 15 and 35; Indian Stamp Rules, 1925 - Rules 7

Reported in : [1987]61CompCas312(Bom)

- bill of exchange should be regarded unstamped - said unstamped bill not admissible in evidence. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … admissibility is upheld. Company - admissibility in evidence - Rule 7 of Indian Stamp Rules, 1925 and Sections 134, 15 and 35 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - suit filed by bank against acceptor of bill of

Sankana Kalana Vs. Virupakshapa Ganeshapa and

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1883)ILR7Bom146

518. Mortgage - Redemption--Prior mortgagee--Puisne mortgagee--Foreclosure--Discharge of surety--Contract Act IX of 1872, Sections 134 and 137. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Tara Chand Sharma and anr., Vs. Uma Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR2010P& H30

of Shri Thakur. However, application was filed by sister of the deceased under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for removal of the Executor. The said application, after trial, has been granted with other consequential orders, which … are sought to be assailed by the removed executor and trustees by filing LPA Nos. 112, 132 and 134 of 2006 which will stand disposed of by this order. Operative part of the impugned order is as

Jagdish Chandra Trikha Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyFamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)753; AIR1998Delhi266; 4(1996)CLT513; [2000]100CompCas839(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT874

necessary to obtain letters of administration in terms of the provisions of Sections 211 and 212 of the Succession Act, 1925 and cases which are of relevance and as cited above may now be referred.(19) In Jogendra Chunder Dutt … basis thereof.The question of supplying a copy of the indemnity bond,therefore, does not arise.Sd/-MANAGER'Reference is also made to Section 16 of the Limitation Act which reads as follows:'16. Effect of death on or before the accrual of … which is some relevance maybe referred to :THE argument for ignoring Article 134-B is that it isa general principle of the law of limitation that

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

any person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act shall be regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Section 21A provides a special provision in certain cases. The provision states that Sections 19, 20 (to the extent … the provisions to be nominated for the payment of gratuity133, to receive funeral expenditure for the deceased spouse, 134 for the payment of medical benefits to the spouse of the insured person,135 and to claim provident fund