Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 133 · Page 1 of about 158 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 2007

T. Sivagnanam (deceased by LR's) and Ors. Vs. Muthu Backialakshmni ali ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-16-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2) and 30; Maintenance Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 124 and 133; Shastric Hindu law

Reported in : AIR2007Mad245

only life interest and not absolute right over the property, has pointed out Section 124 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which reads as under:Bequest contingent upon specified uncertain event, no time being mentioned for its occurrence-Where a legacy … the period when the fund bequeathed is payable or distributable.24. But, in this context, it is worth-referring to Section 133 of the Indian Succession Act which reads as under:Original bequest not affected by invalidity of second:If the ulterior

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1995

Dr. Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. Smt. Raj Kumar Sharma and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-01-1995

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111, 119 and 120; Constitution of India - Articles 133 and 136; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6 Rule 2; Hindu Succession Act 1956 - Sections 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR1996SC869; JT1995(8)SC466; 1995(6)SCALE809; (1996)8SCC128; [1995]Supp6SCR41

111, 119 and 120 of Succession Act, 1925 and Order 6 Rule 2 of CPC, 1908 and Articles 133 and 136 of Constitution of India - appeal against relief of partition by third defendant in suit - … house.(5) On the language of the 1942 Will, it is the exception to Section 111 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 that applies and not Section 119 or for that matter Section 120. Since it was a bequest to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2025

N.P. Saseendran versus N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957

1959 - Art.31 - Registration Act, 1909 - s.17 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - s.2(b) - Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Part VI - ss.2(h), 59, 61, 62, 63, 70, 89 - Respondent No.1 was the plaintiff (daughter) … registration of the same, would amount to acceptance of the gift and the transaction satisfies the requirement of Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Once the document is categorized as a gift, in … 10.06.2019 of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in RSA No. 1338 of 2004Appearances for Parties Advs. for the Appellant: V. Chitambaresh, Sr. Adv.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 19 1935

Administrator-general Vs. A.M. Bower

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-19-1935

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1935All1042; 159Ind.Cas.989

a limited interest, that is an interest for her life only. It is expressly provided by Section 82, Succession Act, 1925, that the meaning of any clause in a will is to be collected from the entire instrument and … gifts are not valid does not and cannot affect the validity of the prior bequest or gift, see Section 133, Succession Act.21. In my view the petitioner has wholly failed to show that this house is now a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2007

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1976

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Madras and ors. Vs. Late R. Sridharan by L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-29-1976

Subject : FamilyDirect Taxation

Acts : Expenditure Tax Act - Sections 25(1); Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 21; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 2(1); Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1); Indian Succession Act, 1925; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 27(1) and 29(1); Income Tax Act - Sections 66(1); Constitution of India - Article 133(1); Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

Reported in : [1976]104ITR436(SC); (1976)4SCC489; [1976]SuppSCR478; 1976(8)LC668(SC)

the property of a person whose marriage has been solemnized under that Act being governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and not by the ordinary Hindu law, Nicolas Sundaram could not become a member of Hindu undivided family, … of the shares and other investments standing in his name being his exclusive properties and by virtue of Section 21 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, succession to the property of a person whose marriage has been … this Court under Section 29(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 and Article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution of India. This is how the appeals arc before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2000

Govinda Naika Vs. Rama Naik and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-28-2000

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 2(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 21, 266 and 366(25); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 113; Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act - Sections 7 and 8; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48-A(5) and 133(1)

Reported in : ILR2000KAR3305; 2000(6)KarLJ259

the custom set up by the defendant was not proved and that since the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 were not applicable to the parties, who belong to a Scheduled Tribe community, the question of conceding … matters which the Tribunal could have determined under the provisions of the Act aforementioned stands specifically excluded by Section 133(1) of the Act. The question whether the grant of the rights was for benefit of the individuals or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1971

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-1971

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 133(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1972SC1470b; [1972]85ITR173(SC); (1972)4SCC14; 1971(III)LC816(SC)

133 (1) as issue involved was incapable of valuation certificate under Articles 133 (1) struck down. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 276: [S.B. Sinha, Lokeshwar Singh Panta & B. Sudershan Reddy, JJ] Forgery of Will

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1970

Madansa Annasa JaIn Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-1970

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 30, 31, 36, 48 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Railways Act - Sections 55, 56, 72 and 77

Reported in : AIR1971Bom34; (1972)74BOMLR568; 1971MhLJ338

Mad. 133 and Secy, of State v. Simla Footwear Co. [1935] A.I.R. All. 601, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1966

Pioneer Dyeing House Ltd. Vs. Shanker Vishnu Marathe

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-20-1966

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153(2)

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas546(Bom); 1967MhLJ557

1 Cal. 127 and Bengal Bank Ltd. v. Suresh Chakravartty [1952] A.I.R. Cal. 133, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial