Advanced Search Results

Darjus Jehangir Vs. Lyla Minoo Ghasvalla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Successions Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 75, 82, 83, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2000Bom372; 2000(2)ALLMR32; 2000(3)BomCR447; (2000)2BOMLR108

Mr. Bookwala had relied upon sections 74, 75, 82, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Mr. Bookwala has relied on the decisions in the cases of (i) Re. Rowland & another 1963 CD … been made to respondent No. 1 and conditional in some of the others. Mr. Bookwala had relied upon sections 74, 75, 82, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Mr. Bookwala has

E. Enasu Vs. Edakkulathur Kunjuvareed Antony and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 131 and 132; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : AIR1969Ker207

parties will beartheir respective costs in this Court. Family - will - Sections 74, 131 and 132 of Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 28 and 29 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - first respondent filed suit for partition … above and dismissedin other respects. The parties will beartheir respective costs in this Court. Family - will - Sections 74, 131 and 132 of Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 28 and 29 of Transfer of Property Act,

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … facto doctrine. 23. In the leading judgment in Gokaraju Rangaraju vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (1981) 3 SCC 132), the Supreme Court dealt with the effect of a declaration by the Supreme Court that the appointment of

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … facto doctrine. 23. In the leading judgment in Gokaraju Rangaraju vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (1981) 3 SCC 132), the Supreme Court dealt with the effect of a declaration by the Supreme Court that the appointment of

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

Anil Dattatray Parab and Others Vs. Jayadev Bal Thackeray

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

more of them. Rule 376 which in my view has to be read with section 218 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 provides for filing of an application for letters of administration where the deceased died intestate. If according to … the counter claim made by the defendant as pleaded in paragraphs 5 to 7, 9 and 126 to 132 of the affidavit in support of the caveat dated 12th February, 2013 be rejected as not maintainable being

Ramesh Ramrao Hate Vs. Parvez B. Bhesania

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13A(2) and 31F; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR407; (1996)98BOMLR784

which make certain facts conclusive evidence of other facts : (see Companies Act, 1956, section 132; the Indian Succession Act, 1925, section 381; Christian Marriage Act, 1872, section 61; Madras Revenue Act, 1869, Section 38; Oaths Act, 1873, section 11).

Tara Chand Sharma and anr., Vs. Uma Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR2010P& H30

of Shri Thakur. However, application was filed by sister of the deceased under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for removal of the Executor. The said application, after trial, has been granted with other consequential orders, which … orders, which are sought to be assailed by the removed executor and trustees by filing LPA Nos. 112, 132 and 134 of 2006 which will stand disposed of by this order. Operative part of the impugned order

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 23 to 50 years in case of female and 26 to 55 in case of a male. 132 Hindu Succession Act 1956 and the Indian Succession Act 1925. 133 Section 55 of the Code of Social … any person whose marriage is solemnized under this Act shall be regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Section 21A provides a special provision in certain cases. The provision states that Sections 19, 20 (to the extent

Central Bank of Nigeria Vs. Williams

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Education

read as if these phrases were defined expressly to give this the same meaning as in the Trustee Act 1925. Section 68 of that Act provides that: "In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires ¦. (17) ¦. the … Soar v Ashwell onwards, as well as by Millett LJ in Paragon. 132. Finally, Lord Neuberger refers in his paragraph 100 to the 1888 Act. … trust. To explain why this is so, it is necessary to examine the rather complicated interaction between the successive statutes of limitation and the equitable rules regarding the limitation of actions against trustees. Two categories of constructive