Advanced Search Results

M.V. Savitri Ammal Vs. Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 129 and 130

Reported in : AIR1969Mad217

absolute owner' of the properties. 13. No costs. Family - estate - Sections 74, 129 and 130 of Succession Act, 1925 - condition apparent in Will that issueless daughter of testator should survive widow and enjoy properties - ultimate … other hand, the contention of the Government is that the instant case is governed by the rule in Section 129 of the present Act (corresponding to Section 116 of the old Act) and that it did not matter

The Secretary, Revenue Dept. Govt. of Madras Vs. M.V. Savitri Ammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 129 and 130; High Court Rules and Orders - Order 45, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1970Mad471; (1970)2MLJ365

the present Will are those contained in Sections 129 and 130 of the Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925). Section 129 applies to a that gift, for some reason, cannot take effect, a substitution is made by the testator

P. Ramachandran Nair Vs. Smt. Suparna Tapan Das

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63 and 283; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 129; Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980 - Rule 374; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2003Bom457; 2003(3)ALLMR638; 2003(6)BomCR35

issues and pass the following order. Family - probate of will - Sections 63, 280 and 283 of Succession Act, 1925, Section 129 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Rule 374 of Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980 and Section

ismail Haji Arat Vs. Umar Abdulla

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1942)44BOMLR256

is also void.;Under Section 27 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Section 129 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the failure contemplated is the failure of a valid gift. Where the gift is void as initio the

Delphine Ann Mascarenhas Vs. MervyIn J.A. Menezes and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 88, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130 and 131; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 111

Reported in : ILR2001KAR4883; 2001(6)KarLJ81

on the basis of the material on record and interpretation of Sections 124 and 131 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') held Issue Nos. 1 and 2 and Additional Issue Nos. and 2 … not lead any evidence. The Trial Court, on the basis of the material on record and interpretation of Sections 124 and 131 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') held Issue Nos. … rules contained in Sections 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129 and 130'. 12. The undisputed facts disclose that the testator of the

Shirinbai Maneckshaw and ors. Vs. Nargacebai J. Motishaw and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 67, 129 and 130

Reported in : AIR1956SC747; [1956]1SCR591

'her heirs, executors and administrators for their own use and benefit absolutely and forever' must take effect under section 129 of the Indian Succession Act. Learned Counsel for the respondents strenuously oppose this construction of the bequest and … contention of the plaintiff was that the bequest to Shirinbai was void under section 67 of the Indian Succession Act. Certain other persons who also claimed to be the heirs of the testator were impleaded as pro forma … a single Judge that neither the rule in Shelley's case nor section 131 of the Law of Property Act, 1925, which abolished that rule, had any application to the bequest and that the widow was entitled to an

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

out of the above said decisions, it is necessary to take notice of the relevant provisions in the Succession Act, 1925. Section 266 of the Act provides that the District Judge shall have, in relation to the granting of Probate … description and which does not". The historical development of the law suggests that the non obstante clause in Section 129 is intended to bypass the entire body of the Code so far as the rules made by the

Parameshwaran Subramani Vs. Nil

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rule, quoted above. The petition is disposed of. No costs. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 129 Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 291 Grant of Letters of Administration Petitioners sought to grant Letters of Administration to Property and credits of

Manubhai Chunilal Vs. the General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Cor ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : AIR1936Bom363; (1936)38BOMLR632; 165Ind.Cas.672

of the Probate and Administration Act, 1881, which are re-enacted in Sections 291 and 292 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the question is whether a suit on a bond so taken falls within Article 68 of the … Court. As far as possible, the Civil Procedure Code is to be applied on the Testamentary side, and Section 129 of the Code gives power to the High Court to make rules to regulate this practice. The present

Priyamvada Devi Birla (Since Deceased) Vs. Madhav Prasad Birla (Since ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 6, 8, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 15D; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 62, 211, 213, 214, 218, 263, 283 and 283(1); ;Probate and Letters of Administration Act - Section 64

Reported in : AIR2006Cal6

under Section 263 while caveatable interest is adjudged on the grounds mentioned in Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). To be more precise under Section 263 of the said Act … 309. 315, 319.(iii) Birmimgham v. Renfrew 57 CLR 666.(iv) Re. Dale Proctor v. Dale (1993) 4 All ER 129.(v) Kuppu Swami v. Perumal : AIR1964Mad291 .(vi) Ms. Meera Dewan v. Sharam : AIR2002Delhi321 .(vii) Dilharshankar Bhecheech v.