Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 124 · Page 1 of about 200 results (0.047 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 20 1993

Anilkumar Narharrao Satarkar and ors. Vs. Shrinivas Alias Digambar Ach ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-20-1993

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82 and 124

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR106

first contingency and to these three plaintiffs in the second. At this juncture, section 124 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 has to be considered. Section 124 reads thus,-'Where a legacy is given if a specified uncertain event shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2006

Unmukt Bhatnagar and ors. Vs. Manoj Bhatnagar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2006

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 124 and 125; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15 and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi248; 128(2006)DLT176; 2006(89)DRJ225; (2006)143PLR21

of interpretation of the Will but arises from a legal bar created by Section 124 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The said section along with illustrations reads as under:Section 124 Bequest contingent upon specified uncertain event, no time

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1972

Smt. Talkeshwari Devi Vs. Ram Ran Bikat Prasad Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-1972

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 124 and 131

Reported in : AIR1972SC639; (1972)1SCC549; [1972]3SCR71; 1972(4)LC551(SC)

effect of the will before us we have to look to Sections 124 and 131 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 124 says:Where a legacy is given if a specified uncertain event shall happen and no time is mentioned in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 08 2003

Arunkumar and anr. Vs. Shriniwas and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 124

Reported in : AIR2003SC2528; 2003(3)ALLMR(SC)692; 2003(6)ALT1(SC); [2003(3)JCR5(SC)]; 2003(2)JKJ445[SC]; 2003(5)MhLj654; (2003)3MLJ121(SC); 2003MPLJ368(SC); 2003(4)SCALE145; (2003)6SCC98

who according to the learned trial Judge in the (sic) of Section 124, illustration (i) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, inherited the property as full owner and therefore, the plaintiffs were not entitled to the relief as prayed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2015

S. Sudaramurthy and Others Vs. Saraswathi Lakshmanan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-21-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

before the devolution took place then the entire property should go to the other grand-daughter. Further, that if Section 124 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies to the facts of the case, then it is clear that … in favour of defendants 1 and 2 is void. Attention is drawn to Section 122 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which reads as follows: 122. Onerous bequests. “ Where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee, he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2007

T. Sivagnanam (deceased by LR's) and Ors. Vs. Muthu Backialakshmni ali ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-16-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2) and 30; Maintenance Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 124 and 133; Shastric Hindu law

Reported in : AIR2007Mad245

only life interest and not absolute right over the property, has pointed out Section 124 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which reads as under:Bequest contingent upon specified uncertain event, no time being mentioned for its occurrence-Where a legacy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1932

indira Rani Ghose Vs. Akhoy Kumar Ghose

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-13-1932

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1933)35BOMLR211

a true construction of the will as a whole, Section 131 and not Section 124 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, was applicable, and that the half share of S, on his death without male issue, passed under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2001

Delphine Ann Mascarenhas Vs. MervyIn J.A. Menezes and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-12-2001

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 88, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130 and 131; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 111

Reported in : ILR2001KAR4883; 2001(6)KarLJ81

on the basis of the material on record and interpretation of Sections 124 and 131 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') held Issue Nos. 1 and 2 and Additional Issue Nos. and 2 … no right to the property etc., stated to this Will'. It may also be useful to refer to Section 124 and illustration (ii) given to Sections 124 and 131 of the Act.(a) Section 124 of the Act reads

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1951

In Re: Estate of Sambhunath Roy and Vs. Gostho Behary Sil and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-1951

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 124, 125, 131 and 134; ;Transfer of Property Act - Section 24

Reported in : AIR1951Cal426

563 P. C.). That was a case of death simpliciter as in illustration (b) of Section 124, Indian Succession Act (formerly Section 111). That section and the illustration read as follows :'Where a legacy is given if a … two daughters, defts. Satya Dassi & Jasoda Dassi, his heirs. Nundolal Roy, the executor, died in or about 1925, leaving his sons, defts. Bankim Chandra, Kala Chand, Tara Chand, Shyam Chand, Ratan Chand & Nemai Chand, his

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2005

Sunkana Sivaram and anr. Vs. Thota Venkata Seshubai (Died) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 15, 75, 83, 84, 86, 87, 88, 93, 97, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 124 and 192 to 195; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18; Hindu Transfers and Bequests Acts, 1914; Hindu Disposition of Property Act, 1916; Hindu Transfers and Bequests (City of Madras) Act, 1921; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 13; Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : 2005(6)ALT264

by Sri Gadireddy Rama Rao and the validity thereof in the light of the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, hereinafter in short referred to as 'Act' for the purpose of convenience.2. Originally, the plaintiff Thota Venkata Seshu … Act in particular. In Arunkumar and Anr. v. Shriniwas and Ors., 2003 (3) Supreme 422 while dealing with Section 124, Illustration (f) of the Act aforesaid and the construction of the Will, a two Judge Bench of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial