Advanced Search Results

Gara Surppadu and ors. Vs. Pandranki Rami Naidu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 191; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 123

Reported in : AIR1984AP386

parties shall bear their own costs in this appeal.13. Appeal allowed. Property - gift - Section 191 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 123 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - appellants claimed possession of certain jewellery as being

N.P. Saseendran versus N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957

1959 - Art.31 - Registration Act, 1909 - s.17 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - s.2(b) - Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Part VI - ss.2(h), 59, 61, 62, 63, 70, 89 - Respondent No.1 was the plaintiff (daughter) … which should be made during the lifetime of the donor, implying imminent vesting of the right upon acceptance. Section 123 states, how a gift is to be made. It has two parts. The earlier part deals with immovable

A. Annapporani Vs. A. Mani and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

law in respect of a Will/Settlement. 14. It is an avowed fact that Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 deals with execution of unprivileged Wills and the same reads as follows: "Every testator, not being a soldier … of execution and further, no particular form of attestation is necessary. 16. It is an acknowledged fact that Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act,1882 deals with the procedure of making a gift of immovable property and

Haribai W/O Digambarrao Bhise Died Through L.Rs. and Ku. Jamunabai D/O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122 and 123

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR112; 2009(6)MhLj75

is a transfer of property that is voluntary, gratuitous and absolute-conferring immediate rights.8. Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 defines 'will' as follows:'will' means the legal declaration of the intention of the testator with respect to his … gift is of immoveable property worth more than Rs.100/-, in absence of registration gift is void as per Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act.22. So evidence of scribe Venkat and of the attesting witness Vitthal shows

Delphine Ann Mascarenhas Vs. MervyIn J.A. Menezes and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 88, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130 and 131; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 111

Reported in : ILR2001KAR4883; 2001(6)KarLJ81

on the basis of the material on record and interpretation of Sections 124 and 131 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') held Issue Nos. 1 and 2 and Additional Issue Nos. and 2 … not lead any evidence. The Trial Court, on the basis of the material on record and interpretation of Sections 124 and 131 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') held Issue Nos. … bequest is subject to the rules contained in Sections 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129 and 130'. 12. The undisputed facts disclose

Jagdish Chandra Trikha Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyFamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)753; AIR1998Delhi266; 4(1996)CLT513; [2000]100CompCas839(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT874

necessary to obtain letters of administration in terms of the provisions of Sections 211 and 212 of the Succession Act, 1925 and cases which are of relevance and as cited above may now be referred.(19) In Jogendra Chunder Dutt … basis thereof.The question of supplying a copy of the indemnity bond,therefore, does not arise.Sd/-MANAGER'Reference is also made to Section 16 of the Limitation Act which reads as follows:'16. Effect of death on or before the accrual of

Smt. Gangawa W/O. Gangangouda Sankangouar vs Smt. Premawa W/O Basangou ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Will? - 32 -(5) Whether the Will has been executed in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 68 of the Evidence Act?”39. The word “Will” is defined under Section 2(h) of The … High Court in Abinash Chandra Bidyanidhi Bhattacharya v. DasarathMalo [ILR (1929) 56 Cal 598 : AIR 1929 Cal 123] it was heldthat a person who had put his name under the word “scribe” was not an attesting

Premavva Prema W/O Basanagouda Harthi vs Dyamavva W/O Yallappagouda Ha ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Will? - 32 -(5) Whether the Will has been executed in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 68 of the Evidence Act?”39. The word “Will” is defined under Section 2(h) of The … High Court in Abinash Chandra Bidyanidhi Bhattacharya v. DasarathMalo [ILR (1929) 56 Cal 598 : AIR 1929 Cal 123] it was heldthat a person who had put his name under the word “scribe” was not an attesting

Gangawwa W/O. Gangangouda Sankangouda vs Sankamma W/O. Shekhargouda Ti ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Will? - 32 -(5) Whether the Will has been executed in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 68 of the Evidence Act?”39. The word “Will” is defined under Section 2(h) of The … High Court in Abinash Chandra Bidyanidhi Bhattacharya v. DasarathMalo [ILR (1929) 56 Cal 598 : AIR 1929 Cal 123] it was heldthat a person who had put his name under the word “scribe” was not an attesting

Prabir Kumar Das Vs. Smt. Jayanti Das and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : City Civil Court Act, 1953 - Sections 2(3), 5, 5(1) and 5(3); ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 270, 300 and 300(1); ;Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; ;Indian Lunacy Act, 1912; ;City Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 1980

Reported in : (2007)1CALLT227(HC)

of 1890)(ii) X X X X X X(iii) the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 (39 of 1925)(iv) the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925)7. Sub-section (1) of Section 300 of the said Act of 1925 empowers the High Court … necessary implication of a mandatory nature of a statute. In Craies on Statute Law (17th Edition) at page 123 it is observed that the general rule applicable to the construction of statutes is that there is not